UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of

the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.     )

Filed by the Registrant 
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant 
Check the appropriate box:
Preliminary Proxy Statement
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
Definitive Proxy Statement
Definitive Additional Materials
Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12

Hillenbrand, Inc.
Hillenbrand, Inc.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
No fee required.
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
(1)Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
(2)Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
(3)Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
(4)Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
(5)Total fee paid:
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
(1)Amount Previously Paid:
(2)Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
(3)Filing Party:
(4)Date Filed:







































HILLENBRAND, INC.

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

To Be Held February 10, 2022

20, 2024

The Annual Meeting of shareholders of Hillenbrand, Inc., an Indiana corporation (the “Company”), will be held at the Company’s headquarters at One Batesville Boulevard, Batesville, Indiana 47006, on Thursday,Tuesday, February 10, 2022,20, 2024, at 10:00 a.m. Eastern Standard Time, for the following purposes:


(1)to elect six members to the Board of Directors;


(2)to approve, by a non-binding advisory vote, the compensation paid by the Company to its Named Executive Officers;


(3)to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2022; and


(4)to transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting and any postponement or adjournment of the meeting.

(1)to elect three members to the Board of Directors;
(2)to approve, by a non-binding advisory vote, the compensation paid by the Company to its Named Executive Officers (“Say on Pay Vote”);
(3)to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2024; and
(4)to transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting and any postponement or adjournment of the meeting.
We intend to hold the Annual Meeting in person. But given public health concerns related to the COVID-19 pandemic,person, but we urge you to consider voting in advance of the meeting via one of the remote methods described in the proxy statement in lieu of attending the meeting in person. In addition, we continue to actively monitor developments in relation to the COVID-19 pandemic, including the spread of variant strains of the virus, and we regularly review and consider the related requirements, recommendations, and protocols that are issued and that may be issued by public health authorities and governments, including in relation to masking, testing, and vaccinations. The health and well-being of our employees and shareholders is a high priority, and we are sensitive to the public health and travel concerns our shareholders may have. Accordingly, ifstatement. If for any reason we determine that it is not possible or advisable to hold the Annual Meeting in person, we will announce alternative arrangements for the meeting, which may include a change in venue or holding the meeting solely by means of remote communication. We will announce any such change and the details on how to participate by press release, on our web site at https://ir.hillenbrand.com, and in a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. If you are planning to attend the Annual Meeting in person, please check our web site priorin advance for any updates to planned arrangements.
In preparing for the meeting date. In addition, for your safetyAnnual Meeting, we regularly review and ours, weconsider the requirements, recommendations, and protocols that are issued and that may be issued by public health authorities and governments. We require you to register your planned in-person attendance with us at least ten (10) business days prior to the meeting, by writing to the Investor Relations Department, Hillenbrand, Inc., One Batesville Boulevard, Batesville, Indiana 47006 or by email at investors@hillenbrand.com. Pre-registrationPreregistration and an admission ticket, as well as matching photo identification, are necessary to gain entrance to the secure area of our headquarters building where the meeting will be held, and we expect that enhanced health and safety protocols will be in place. Similar to last year and subject to public health circumstances at the time of the Annual Meeting, we may again limit food or beverage service and other opportunities for social interaction. Even if unable this year, we hope to resume the social elements of our Annual Meeting in the future, as we trulyheld. We value the opportunity to have more personal engagement with our shareholders.

shareholders and require you to follow these procedures and any protocols we may have in place on the meeting date.

By Order of the Board of Directors,
(GRAPHIC) 
Picture1.jpg
Nicholas R. Farrell
Secretary




Your vote is very important. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we encourage you to read the proxy statement and submit your proxy and voting instructions as soon as possible. Important notice regarding the availability of proxy materials for the Annual Meeting of shareholders to be held on February 10, 2022:20, 2024: This proxy statement, the accompanying proxy card, and our 20212023 Annual Report to Shareholders are available on the Internet at www.hillenbrand.com.

December 30, 2021

January 9, 2024



TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

Page
15
24
38
42
43
44
45
77
78
94
96
97
98
99
100
104
105
106
108
A-1
A-1





[This page intentionally left blank.]




HILLENBRAND, INC.

PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

To assist you in reviewing the proposals to be acted upon at the 20222024 Annual Meeting of shareholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of Hillenbrand, Inc., an Indiana corporation (“Hillenbrand” or the “Company”), we call your attention to the following information about the proposals and the Board’s voting recommendations, along with highlights of the Company’s corporate governance and executive compensation practices. The following description is only a summary. For more complete information about these topics, please review the proxy statement in its entirety.

Annual Meeting Information

Time and Date:February 10, 202220, 2024 @ 10:00 a.m. EST
Location:Hillenbrand headquarters
Record Date:December 13, 202115, 2023
Admission:
Pre-registration by emailwriting to the Investor Relations Department (email to investors@hillenbrand.comacceptable), together with ticket attached to the proxy card (available to beneficial owners upon request as described in the proxy statement) and photo identification

See “Questions and Answers about the Annual Meeting and Voting” in the proxy statement for additional information.

Proposals and Voting Recommendations

ProposalBoard’s Voting
Recommendation
Page References
ProposalBoard’s Voting
Recommendation
Page
References
No. 1Election of DirectorsFOR15
No. 2Non-Binding Advisory Vote to Approve Compensation of Named Executive Officers, or “Say on Pay”FOR99
No. 3Ratification of Appointment of the Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmFOR106

Incentive Compensation Plans and Results

Our compensation program is characterized by certain distinct features highlighted in the proxy statement that we believe strengthen its performance orientation and reflect our ongoing commitment to align executive pay with long term shareholder value.1
Short-term: The Compensation and Management Development Committee of our Board of Directors (the “Compensation Committee”) has determined for fiscal 2023 to use net revenue, order intake (used by our Coperion subsidiary in lieu of net revenue as further describeddetailed in the proxy statement), adjusted incomeearnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (“IBT”EBITDA”), and cash

1 See the “Executive Compensation” section of our proxy statement for additional detail on our compensation program and for additional background on our Say on Pay Vote.
1


conversion cycle as the metrics for the Company’s short-term incentive compensation (“STIC”) plan in evaluating the Company’s operational performance, efficiency, and sustainable improvements, as shown in the charts below. We believe that these metrics align the interests of our management with those of our shareholders. For fiscal 2021 STIC,2023, the Compensation Committee approved useconducted a comprehensive review of two six-month measurement periods rather than the traditional one twelve-month periodperformance and also modified the payout curves as described in the proxy statement, given the uncertainty associated with the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, formetrics within the second six-month measurement period,STIC plan and determined that the wider and flatter curves used in the past two performance cycles were no longer needed to address the economic and supply chain challenges brought about by COVID. Therefore, the Compensation Committee addedset performance and payout curves to levels more consistent with pre-pandemic levels, and which aligned with the creation of specific plans to increase workforce diversity as partgoing-forward needs of the Named Executive Officers’ collective performance goal relating to diverse talent pools. As described in the proxy statement, an individual officer’s Individual Performance Factor for STIC purposes is based upon his or her execution of collective performance goals, among other factors. In fiscal 2022, the Compensation Committee has resumed the historical practice of a single twelve-month performance period, as further described in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of the proxy statement.

1Company.

The following charts show actual performance for these metrics for the past three years, reflected as the achievement percentage of target:1

(GRAPHIC) 

2

23292330
2332
Long-term: For the Company’s long-term incentive compensation (“LTIC”) plan for our Named Executive Officers, the Compensation Committee determined for fiscal 20212023 that one-third of the grant value would be awarded in time-based restricted stock units and the remaining two-thirds would be awarded in performance-based restricted stock units. The performance-based awards are based on shareholder value creation and relative total shareholder return metrics over a three-year measurement period, which we believe closely aligns the interests of our management with those of our shareholders.2

1 2The charts present the achievement percentages for these metrics at the consolidated Company level for the Named Executive Officers. As part of the annual compensation setting process, the Compensation Committee establishes payout curves for these achievement percentages to determine payout levels. These charts do not reflect achievement of these metrics at an underlying business unit level, nor achievement of the order intake metric used by our Coperion subsidiary which applyapplies to certainone of our Named Executive Officers as further explained in the proxy statement. Fiscal 2021 information is presented as the sum of the two underlying six-month performance periods (or, in the case of cash conversion cycle, the average of the two periods). In addition, beginning withfor awards made in fiscal 2021 and fiscal 2022, the Company modified its historical “STIC IBT” measure by using anused a different externally reported financial metric as the starting point for calculation. This newmeasure, called “Adjusted IBT” measureIncome Before Taxes (IBT),” is further explained in the fiscal 2021 and 2022 proxy statements. The measure used in fiscal 2023, Adjusted EBITDA, is also further explained in this proxy statement. The chart shows STIC IBTAdjusted EBITDA achievement for fiscal years 2019 and 2020,year 2023, and Adjusted IBT achievement for fiscal 2021.

2021 and 2022.

2As further explained


the grant value would be awarded in time-based restricted stock units and the proxy statement, the Compensation Committee modified elements of the calculation ofremaining two-thirds would be awarded in performance-based restricted stock units. The performance-based awards are based on shareholder value delivered for performance-based LTIC awards made beginning in fiscal 2021 to morecreation and relative total shareholder return metrics over a three-year measurement period, which we believe closely alignaligns the interests of our management with measures used in the Company’s external financial reporting.

2those of our shareholders.

The following charts show actual performanceachievement relative to target for these metrics for the past three measurement periods, reflected as the achievement percentage of target:

(GRAPHIC) 

periods:

3063
1099511634666



3


Governance and Executive Compensation Highlights

The following highlightsgraphics highlight key components of our governance and executive compensation practices.

Here’s What We Do . . .
(GRAPHIC)
þPay for performance
(GRAPHIC)
þ
Benchmark Named Executive Officer target core compensation3 to the 50th percentile of peer group compensation3
(GRAPHIC)
þMaintain stock ownership guidelines based on shares of Company common stock and time-based restricted stock units beneficially owned: for directors, five times annual cash compensation; for the CEO, five times base salary; for Senior Vice Presidents, two times base salary; for certain other senior officers designated by the CEO, one times base salary
(GRAPHIC)
þ
Seek to ensure that at least 75 percent of the CEO’s target core compensation is at risk4
(GRAPHIC)
þRequire an independent Chairperson of the Board and that at least 80 percent of directors be independent
(GRAPHIC)
þRequire executives and directors to preclear all stock trades, including gifts, with the Company’s Legal Department
þRequire that directors receive at least a majority of the votes cast in an uncontested election to be elected
þRequire that the Compensation Committee, the Audit Committee, and the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee of our Board each be composed entirely of outside, independent directors
þEngage an independent compensation consultant, hired by and reporting directly to the Compensation Committee
þOperate with multiple performance metrics that drive our incentive compensation plans, including a relative metric that measures our performance against the Standard & Poor’s 400 Mid Cap Industrials index (a peer group reflecting companies of similar size and complexity)
þMaintain a clawback policy covering cash and equity incentive compensation plans that applies in the event of a restatement of our financial statements
þ
Impose a limit of $600,000 on total annual base compensation5 for non-employee directors

3We define our Named Executive Officers’ annual “core compensation” as annual base salary and the target values for STIC and LTIC.

4A portion of the CEO’s target core compensation consists of time-based restricted stock units, which the Compensation Committee considers to be “at risk” since the value fluctuates based on stock price performance and vesting of all tranches is contingent upon continued service. This portion does not exceed one-third of target annual LTIC awards made to the CEO and, together with the portion represented by performance-based LTIC awards and STIC, comprises the “at risk” compensation.

5 Director “annual base compensation” includes both the annual cash retainer and grant date fair value of annual stock award as detailed further in this proxy statement.
3
4



(GRAPHIC)Require that the Compensation Committee be composed entirely of outside, independent directors
(GRAPHIC)Engage an independent compensation consultant, hired by and reporting directly to the Compensation Committee
(GRAPHIC)þOperate with multiple performance metrics that drive our incentive compensation plans, including a relative metric that measures our performance against an appropriate peer group of companies, currently the Standard & Poor’s 400 Mid Cap Industrials index
(GRAPHIC)Maintain a clawback policy covering cash and equity incentive compensation plans that applies in the event of a restatement of our financial statements
(GRAPHIC)Impose a limit of $600,000 on total annual base compensation5 for non-employee directors
(GRAPHIC)Encourage Board refreshment in a variety of ways, including by requiring, without exemptions or conditions, our directors to retire no later than the first Annual Meeting of shareholders following the date on which that director turns 73 years of age
(GRAPHIC)
þMaintain a Board diversity policy that provides that Board members will be diverse in terms of gender and of race and ethnicity, and in terms of other characteristics, including background, perspective, knowledge, skills, and experience

Here’s What We Don’t Do . . .
xPermit re-pricing, exchanging, or cashing out of “underwater” stock options without shareholder approval
xPermit spring-loading, back-dating, or similar practices that “time” the grant of our equity awards
xPermit granting of stock options below fair market value
xPermit “recycling” (into the equity plan pool) of Company shares that are (i) used to pay an award exercise price or withholding taxes, or (ii) repurchased on the open market with the proceeds of a stock option exercise price
xPermit transferability of stock options for consideration

5 As defined in the proxy statement.

4

xPermit single-trigger change in control agreements for Named Executive Officers and certain other executives
xPermit change in control tax gross-ups for executives
xPermit a liberal change in control definition in our equity plan
xPermit pledging, short sales or hedging of Company securities by directors, officers, or other employees
xPermit directors, officers, or other employees to hold Company securities in margin accounts or otherwise to pledge Company securities as collateral for loans



5


Recent Developments

This past year, we have augmented our governance and executive compensation practices in the following ways:

(GRAPHIC)Added two new independent members of
þAppointed Helen W. Cornell as our third Board Chairperson, effective upon the Board:  Dennis W. Pullin, who is a memberretirement of our Compensation Committee and our Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee, and Inderpreet Sawhney, who is a member of our Audit Committee and our Nominating/Corporate Governance Committeeprior Board Chairperson on January 10, 2023
(GRAPHIC)Completed our CEO transition, with Joe A. Raver retiring and Kimberly K. Ryan being elected President and Chief Executive Officer and appointed a member of the Board
(GRAPHIC)þPublished our secondfourth annual sustainability report, or Communication on Progress, under the United Nations Global Compact, enhancing our energy and emissions data for major manufacturing sites, including core elements of the GRI Standards from the Global Reporting Initiativeinitial Scope 3 disclosures, and expanding health and safety and diversity disclosures
(GRAPHIC)
þUpdated our STIC program to replace the prior Adjusted IBT measure with one based on Adjusted EBITDA, which further aligns internal compensation with externally reported metrics while preserving the overall focuses of top- and bottom-line growth, healthy cash generation, and the appropriate balance of STIC components
þTightened our STIC performance and payout curves to encourage achievement and emphasize high performance
þRevised and updated our clawback policy (“Clawback Policy”) to align with final Securities & Exchange Commission rules and New York Stock Exchange listing standards, and to strengthen the Company’s ability to recover any erroneously awarded performance-based compensation
þAdopted the Company’s Third Amended and Restated Short-Term Incentive Compensation Planan amendment to among other things, expand the list of potential performance goals to include additional financial and operational metrics, as well as diversity, equity, and inclusion (DE&I) and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) metrics, and to make other changes in accordance with prevailing market practices
(GRAPHIC)Measured performance for STIC purposes based on two six-month performance periods and also modified the payout curves, given the uncertainty associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, and added the creation of specific plans to increase workforce diversity as part of the Named Executive Officers’ collective performance goal relating to diverse talent pools

5

(GRAPHIC)Engaged a new independent compensation committee consultant, Pay Governance LLC, following a robust proposal and interview process
(GRAPHIC)Adopted our Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan, approved byCode of By-Laws to prohibit indemnification to a Company director, officer, or employee that would be against public policy, in further support of the revised Clawback Policy
þAmended our shareholders,Insider Trading and Disclosure Policy to reflect new Exchange Act Rule 10b5-1 requirements, including mandatory “cooling-off” periods and limitations on the number and types of plans permitted to be adopted
þImplemented a new limitcompensation peer group following the divestiture of our historical Batesville business segment, which represented a strategic shift in the Company’s business and accelerated our transformation into a pure-play industrial company
þ
Revised our Code of Ethical Business Conduct (available on total annual base compensation for non-employee directorsour web site) in connection with our transformation into a pure-play industrial company, with a focus on, among other improvements, reflecting the Company’s recently adopted Purpose, Shape What Matters For TomorrowTM, and its updated mission, vision, and values

6


HILLENBRAND, INC.

PROXY STATEMENT

This proxy statement relates to the solicitation by the Board of Directors of Hillenbrand, Inc. (the “Company” or “Hillenbrand”) of proxies for use at the Annual Meeting of the Company’s shareholders to be held at the Company’s headquarters at One Batesville Boulevard, Batesville, Indiana 47006, telephone (812) 934-7500,931-5000, on Thursday,Tuesday, February 10, 2022,20, 2024, at 10:00 a.m. Eastern Standard Time, and at any postponements or adjournments of the meeting. This proxy statement was first mailed to shareholders on or about December 30, 2021.

January 9, 2024.

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING

The following questions and answers will explain the purpose of this proxy statement and what you need to know to vote your shares. Throughout these questions and answers and the proxy statement, we sometimes refer to Hillenbrand and the Company in terms of “we,” “us,” or “our.”


Q:
Q:What is the purpose of this proxy statement?


A:
The Board of Directors of Hillenbrand (the “Board”) is soliciting your proxy to vote at the 20222024 Annual Meeting of shareholders of Hillenbrand because you were a shareholder at the close of business on December 13, 2021,15, 2023, the record date for the 20222024 Annual Meeting, and are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. The record date for the 20222024 Annual Meeting was established by the Board in accordance with our Amended and Restated Code of By-laws (the “By-laws”) and Indiana law.
This proxy statement contains the matters that must be set out in a proxy statement according to the rules of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) and provides the information you need to know to vote at the Annual Meeting. You do not need to attend the Annual Meeting to vote your shares.

This proxy statement contains the matters that must be set out in a proxy statement according to the rules of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and the New York Stock Exchange and provides the information you need to know to vote at the Annual Meeting. You do not need to attend the Annual Meeting to vote your shares.


Q:
Q:What is the difference between holding shares as a “shareholder of record” and as a “beneficial owner”?


A:
If your shares are registered directly in your name with Hillenbrand’s transfer agent, Computershare Investor Services, LLC, you are the “shareholder of record” with respect to those shares, and you tell us directly how your shares are to be voted.
If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other nominee, then your nominee is the shareholder of record for your shares and you are considered the “beneficial owner” of shares held in street name. As the beneficial owner, you direct your broker, bank, or nominee how to vote your shares.

If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other nominee, then your nominee is the shareholder of record for your shares and you are considered the “beneficial owner” of shares held in street name. As the beneficial owner, you direct your broker, bank, or nominee how to vote your shares.

7


7

Q :
Q:What am I being asked to vote on?

A:
A:
Election of sixthree directors for the termsthree-year term set forth under Proposal No. 1 – Election of Directors: Gary L. Collar, F. Joseph Loughrey, Joy M. Greenway, DennisHelen W. Pullin, Kimberly K. Ryan,Cornell, Jennifer W. Rumsey, and Inderpreet Sawhney;


Stuart A. Taylor, II;
Approval, by a non-binding advisory vote, of the compensation paid to the Company’s Named Executive Officers, as disclosed pursuant to SEC compensation disclosure rules in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” and “Executive Compensation Tables” sections of this proxy statement and in any related material herein (the “Say on Pay Vote”); and


Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP (“EY’) as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2022.2024.

The Board recommends a vote FOR each of the director nominees; FOR approval of the compensation paid to the Named Executive Officers of the Company pursuant to the Say on Pay Vote; and FOR the ratification of the appointment of EY as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2022.

Our Named Executive Officers are those officers specified by Item 402(a)(3) of Regulation S-K. See the introductory discussion in Part I under “Executive Compensation” for more information regarding Named Executive Officers.

Q:
The Board recommends a vote FOR each of the director nominees; FOR approval of the compensation paid to the Named Executive Officers of the Company pursuant to the Say on Pay Vote; and FOR the ratification of the appointment of EY as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2024.
Our Named Executive Officers are those officers specified by Item 402(a)(3) of Regulation S-K. See the introductory discussion in Part I under “Executive Compensation” for more information regarding Named Executive Officers.
Q:What are the voting requirements to elect the directors and to approve the other proposals being voted on?

A:
A:
The Restated and Amended Articles of Incorporation of Hillenbrand (as amended to date, the “Articles of Incorporation”) provide that in an uncontested election, the directors are elected by a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting. This means that to be elected, the number of votes cast “for” a director nominee must exceed the number of votes “withheld” from that nominee.
The adoption of each of the proposals (a) to approve, by a non-binding advisory vote, the compensation paid to the Named Executive Officers, and (b) to ratify the appointment of EY as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2024 requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast for or against approval.
If you are present or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and you affirmatively elect to abstain, your abstention, as well as any broker non-votes, will not be counted as votes cast on any matter to which they relate. See “How will my shares be voted?” below for more information about broker non-votes.

The adoption of each of the proposals (a) to approve, by a non-binding advisory vote, the compensation paid to the Named Executive Officers, and (b) to ratify the appointment of EY as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2022 requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast for or against approval.

If you are present or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and you affirmatively elect to abstain, your abstention, as well as any broker non-votes, will not be counted as votes cast on any matter to which they relate. See “How will my shares be voted?” below for more information about broker non-votes.

Q:
Q:How many votes do I have?

A:
A:You are entitled to one vote for each share of Hillenbrand common stock that you held as of the record date.

8


8

Q:
Q:How do I vote?

A:
A:The different ways that you (if you are a shareholder of record) or your nominee (if you are a beneficial owner) can vote your shares depend on how you received your proxy statement this year.

For shareholders of record, many of you were not mailed a paper copy of proxy materials, including this proxy statement, a proxy card, and our 2021 Annual Report to Shareholders. Instead, commencing on or about December 30, 2021, we sent you a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (“Notice”) telling you that proxy materials are available at the web site indicated in that Notice, www.proxyvote.com, and giving you instructions for voting your shares at that web site. We also told you in that Notice (and on the web site) how you can request us to mail proxy materials to you. If you subsequently do receive proxy materials by mail, you can vote in any of the ways described below. If not, you must vote via the Internet (and we encourage you to do so) at www.proxyvote.com, by telephone, or in person at the Annual Meeting as explained below.

With respect to shareholders of record who received proxy materials by mail, we commenced mailing on or about December 30, 2021. You can vote using any of the following methods:


(GRAPHIC)
For shareholders of record, many of you were not mailed a paper copy of proxy materials, including this proxy statement, a proxy card, and our 2023 Annual Report to Shareholders. Instead, commencing on or about January 9, 2024, we sent you a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (“Notice”) telling you that proxy materials are available at the web site indicated in that Notice, www.proxyvote.com, and giving you instructions for voting your shares at that web site. We also told you in that Notice (and on the web site) how you can request us to mail proxy materials to you. If you subsequently do receive proxy materials by mail, you can vote in any of the ways described below. If not, you must vote via the Internet (and we encourage you to do so) at www.proxyvote.com, by telephone, or in person at the Annual Meeting as explained below.
With respect to shareholders of record who received proxy materials by mail, we commenced mailing on or about January 9, 2024. You can vote using any of the following methods:
Picture1.jpg
Proxy card or voting instruction card. Be sure to complete, sign, and date the card and return it in the prepaid envelope.
(GRAPHIC)
Picture2.jpg
By telephone or the Internet.The telephone and Internet voting procedures established by Hillenbrand for shareholders of record are explained in detail on your proxy card and in the Notice many shareholders receive. These procedures are designed to authenticate your identity, to allow you to give your voting instructions, and to confirm that these instructions have been properly recorded.
(GRAPHIC)
Picture1.jpg
In person at the Annual Meeting.You may vote in person at the Annual Meeting. You may also be represented by another person at the meeting by executing a proper proxy designating that person. If you are not the record holder of your shares and want to attend the meeting and vote in person, you must obtain a legal proxy from your broker, bank, or nominee and present it to the inspectors of election with your ballot when you vote at the meeting.
With respect to the beneficial owners of shares held by nominees, the methods by which you can access proxy materials and give voting instructions to your nominee may vary, depending on the nominee. Accordingly, if you are such a beneficial owner, you should follow the instructions provided by your nominee.

9



With respect to the beneficial owners of shares held by nominees, the methods by which you can access proxy materials and give voting instructions to your nominee may vary, depending on the nominee. Accordingly, if you are such a beneficial owner, you should follow the instructions provided by your nominee.

Q:
Q:I share an address with another shareholder and we received only one Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or one paper copy of the proxy materials, as applicable. How may I obtain an additional copy?

A:
A:
The Company has adopted a procedure approved by the SEC called “householding.” Under this procedure, the Company is delivering a single copy of either the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or a paper copy of the proxy materials, as applicable, to multiple shareholders who share the same addressaddress, unless the Company has received contrary instructions from one or more of the shareholders. This procedure reduces the Company’s printing costs, mailing costs,costs, and fees. Shareholders who participate in householding will continue to be able to access and receive separate proxy cards. Upon written or oral request, a separate copy of the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or a paper copy of the proxy materials or the annual report, as applicable, will be promptly delivered to any shareholder at a shared address to which the Company delivered a single copy. To receive a separate copy, or a separate copy of future materials, shareholders may write or call the Company’s Investor Relations Department at One Batesville Boulevard, Batesville, Indiana 47006, telephone (812) 931-6000,931‑6000, and facsimile (812) 931-5209. Shareholders who hold shares in street name may contact their broker, bank, or other nominee to request information about householding.

Q:
Q:How will my shares be voted?

A:
A:
For shareholders of record, all shares represented by the proxies mailed to shareholders will be voted at the Annual Meeting in accordance with instructions given by the shareholder. Where proxies are returned without instructions, the shares will be voted: (1) (1) FOR election of each of the sixthree nominees named above as directors of the Company; (2) (2) FOR approval, by a non-binding advisory vote, of the compensation paid to the Named Executive Officers pursuant to the Say on Pay Vote; (3) (3) FOR ratification of the appointment of EY as the independent registered public accounting firm of the Company for fiscal year 2022;2024; and (4) in the discretion of the proxy holders, upon such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting (we are not currently aware of any other matter that may come before the meeting). Where a proxy is not returned, your shares will not be voted unless you attend the Annual Meeting and vote in person (including by means of remote communication, if applicable).
For beneficial owners, the brokers, banks, or nominees holding shares for the beneficial owner must vote those shares as instructed. If the broker, bank, or nominee has not received instructions from the beneficial owner, the broker, bank, or nominee generally has discretionary voting power only with respect to matters that are considered routine matters. Under applicable New York Stock Exchange rules, Proposal No. 1 relating to election of directors, and Proposal No. 2 relating to a non-binding advisory vote to approve Named Executive Officer compensation are deemed to be non-routine matters with respect to which brokers and nominees may not exercise their voting discretion without receiving instructions from the beneficial owners of the shares (this is referred to as a “broker non-vote”). Proposal No. 3 relating to ratification of the appointment of EY as the independent registered public accounting firm of the Company for fiscal year 2024 is a matter on which brokers holding stock for the accounts of their clients who have not been given specific voting instructions are allowed to vote client shares.

For beneficial owners, the brokers, banks, or nominees holding shares for the beneficial owner must vote those shares as instructed. If the broker, bank, or nominee has not received instructions from the beneficial owner, the broker, bank, or nominee generally has discretionary voting power only with respect to matters that are considered routine matters. Under applicable New York Stock Exchange rules, Proposal No. 1 relating to election of directors and Proposal No. 2 relating to a non-binding advisory vote to approve Named Executive Officer compensation, are deemed to be non-routine matters with respect to which brokers and nominees may not exercise their voting discretion without receiving instructions from the beneficial owners of the shares (this is referred to as a “broker non-vote”). Proposal No. 3 relating to ratification of the appointment of EY as the independent registered public accounting firm of the Company for fiscal year 2022 is a matter on which brokers holding stock for the accounts of their clients who have not been given specific voting instructions are allowed to vote client shares. To avoid a broker non-vote of your shares on Proposals No. 1 and 2, you must send voting instructions to your bank, broker, or nominee or obtain a legal proxy and vote your shares in person at the Annual Meeting.

10



Q:
To avoid a broker non-vote of your shares on Proposals No. 1 and 2, you must send voting instructions to your bank, broker, or nominee or obtain a legal proxy and vote your shares in person at the Annual Meeting.
Q:What can I do if I change my mind after I vote my shares prior to the Annual Meeting?

A:
A:
If you are a shareholder of record, you may revoke your proxy at any time before it is voted at the Annual Meeting by:


sending written notice of revocation to the Secretary of Hillenbrand at One Batesville Boulevard, Batesville, Indiana 47006;


submitting a revised proxy by telephone, Internet, or paper ballot after the date of the revoked proxy; or


attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person.
If you are a beneficial owner of shares, you may submit new voting instructions by contacting your broker, bank, or nominee. You may also vote in person at the Annual Meeting if you obtain a legal proxy as described under “How do I vote?” above.

If you are a beneficial owner of shares, you may submit new voting instructions by contacting your broker, bank, or nominee. You may also vote in person at the Annual Meeting if you obtain a legal proxy as described under “How do I vote?” above.

Q:
Q:Who will count the votes?

A:
A:Representatives of Broadridge Investor Communication Solutions, Inc. (“Broadridge”) will tabulate the votes and act as inspectors of election.

Q:
Q:What constitutes a quorum at the Annual Meeting?

A:As of the record date, 72,484,25070,123,120 shares of Hillenbrand common stock were outstanding. A majority of the outstanding shares must be present or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting to constitute a quorum for the purpose of conducting business at the Annual Meeting. Your shares will be considered part of the quorum if you submit a properly executed proxy or attend the Annual Meeting.

11

Q:
Q:Who can attend the Annual Meeting in person?

A:
We intend to hold the Annual Meeting in person. But given public health concerns related to the COVID-19 pandemic,person, but, we urge you to consider voting in advance of the meeting via one of the remote methods described above in lieu of attending the meeting in person. Even so, all shareholders as of the record date may attend the Annual Meeting in person but must have an admission ticket, bring matching photo identification, and register their planned in-person attendance with the Company at least ten (10) business days prior to the Annual Meeting, by writing to the Investor Relations Department, Hillenbrand, Inc., One Batesville Boulevard, Batesville, Indiana 47006 or by email at investors@hillenbrand.com. In addition, we expect that enhanced healthrequire you to follow these procedures and safetyany protocols will bewe may have in place.place on the meeting date. If you are a shareholder of record, the ticket attached to the proxy card or a copy of your Notice (whichever you receive), together with matching photo identification and pre-registration, will admit you.
11



If you are a beneficial owner, you may request a ticket by writing to the Secretary of Hillenbrand at One Batesville Boulevard, Batesville, Indiana 47006, or by faxing your request to (812) 931-5185 or emailing it to investors@hillenbrand.com. You must provide evidence of your ownership of shares with your ticket request, which you can obtain from your broker, bank, or nominee. We encourage you or your broker to fax or email your ticket request and proof of ownership as soon as possible to avoid any mail delays. As described in the cover letter to this proxy statement, we continue to monitor developments in relation to the COVID-19 pandemic and ifIf for any reason we determine that it is not possible or advisable to hold the Annual Meetingmeeting in person, we will announce alternative arrangementsany such change and the details on how to participate by press release, on our website at https://ir.hillenbrand.com, and in a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. If you are planning to attend the Annual Meeting in person, please check our website in advance for the meeting.any updates to planned arrangements.

Q:
Q:When are shareholder proposals due for the 20232025 Annual Meeting?

A:
A:
For a shareholder proposal to be presented at the Company’s 20232025 Annual Meeting of shareholders and to be considered for possible inclusion in the Company’s proxy statement and form of proxy relating to that meeting, it must be submitted to and received by the Secretary of Hillenbrand at its principal offices at One Batesville Boulevard, Batesville, Indiana 47006, not later than September 1, 2022.11, 2024. Our By-laws describe certain information required to be submitted with such a proposal.
In addition, without regard to whether a proposal is or is not submitted in time for possible inclusion in our proxy statement for the 2025 Annual Meeting, our By-laws provide that for business to be brought before the Annual Meeting by a shareholder, or for director nominations to be made by a shareholder for consideration at the Annual Meeting, written notice thereof must be received by the Secretary of Hillenbrand at its principal offices not later than 100 days prior to the anniversary of the immediately preceding Annual Meeting, or not later than November 12, 2024, for the 2025 Annual Meeting of shareholders. This notice must also provide certain information as set forth in our By-laws. See the discussion below under “Committees of the Board of Directors” under “The Board of Directors and Committees” for additional details regarding shareholder nominees for director. In addition to the foregoing, any shareholder who intends to solicit proxies in support of director nominees other than the Company's nominees must comply with the additional requirements of Rule 14a-19 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

In addition, without regard to whether a proposal is or is not submitted in time for possible inclusion in our proxy statement for the 2023 Annual Meeting, our By-laws provide that for business to be brought before the Annual Meeting by a shareholder, or for director nominations to be made by a shareholder for consideration at the Annual Meeting, written notice thereof must be received by the Secretary of Hillenbrand at its principal offices not later than 100 days prior to the anniversary of the immediately preceding Annual Meeting, or not later than November 2, 2022, for the 2023 Annual Meeting of shareholders. This notice must also provide certain information as set forth in our By-laws. See the discussion below under “Committees of the Board of Directors” under “The Board of Directors and Committees” for additional details regarding shareholder nominees for director.

12


Q:
Q:What happens if a nominee for director is unable to serve as a director?


A:If any of the nominees becomes unavailable for election, which we do not expect to happen, votes will be cast for such substitute nominee or nominees as may be designated by the Board, unless the Board reduces the number of directors.


Q:
Q:Can I view the shareholder list? If so, how?


A:A complete list of the shareholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will be available to view during the Annual Meeting. The list will also be available to view at the Company’s principal offices during regular business hours during the five business days preceding the Annual Meeting.

12




Q:
Q:Who pays for the proxy solicitation related to the Annual Meeting?


A:
The Company pays for the proxy solicitation related to the Annual Meeting. In addition to sending you these materials, some of our directors and officers, as well as management and non-management employees, may contact you by telephone, mail, email, or in person. You may also be solicited by means of press releases issued by Hillenbrand and postings on our web sitewww.hillenbrand.com., www.hillenbrand.com. None of our officers or employees will receive any additional compensation for soliciting your proxy. We have retained Broadridge to assist us with proxy solicitation and related services for an estimated fee of $12,000, plus reasonable out of pocket expenses. Such fees will be incurred after the mailing of the proxy materials. Broadridge will ask brokers, banks, and other custodians and nominees whether they hold shares for which other persons are beneficial owners. If so, we will supply them with additional copies of the proxy materials for distribution to the beneficial owners. We will also reimburse banks, nominees, fiduciaries, brokers, and other custodians for their costs of sending proxy materials to the beneficial owners of Hillenbrand common stock.


Q:
Q:How can I obtain a copy of the Annual Report on Form 10-K?


A:
A copy of Hillenbrand’s 20212023 Annual Report on Form 10-K, as well as Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K, are available on the Internet at the Company’s web site, www.hillenbrand.com.The 20212023 Annual Report on Form 10-K may also be obtained free of charge by writing or calling the Investor Relations Department of Hillenbrand at its principal offices at One Batesville Boulevard, Batesville, Indiana 47006, telephone (812) 931-6000, and facsimile (812) 931-5209.

13


Q:How can I obtain the Company’s corporate governance information?


A:
The documents listed below are available on the Internet at the Company’s web site, www.hillenbrand.com. You may also go directly tohttps://ir.hillenbrand.com/corporate-governance/governance-documentsgovernance-documents for those documents. Printed copies are also available to any shareholder who requests them through our Investor Relations Department at One Batesville Boulevard, Batesville, Indiana 47006, telephone (812) 931-6000,931‑6000, and facsimile (812) 931-5209. The available documents are:


Hillenbrand, Inc. Corporate Governance Standards

Hillenbrand, Inc. Committee Charters – Audit Committee, Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee, Compensation and Management Development Committee, and Mergers and Acquisitions Committee

Position Descriptions for Chairperson of the Board, Vice Chairperson of the Board, Members of the Board, and Committee Chairpersons

Restated and Amended Articles of Incorporation of Hillenbrand, Inc.

Amended and Restated Code of By-laws of Hillenbrand, Inc.

Hillenbrand, Inc. Code of Ethical Business Conduct

Hillenbrand, Inc. Global Anti-Corruption Policy

Supply Chain Transparency Policy – Hillenbrand, Inc. and its subsidiaries

Human Rights Policy – Hillenbrand, Inc. and its subsidiaries

Global Environmental Policy – Hillenbrand, Inc. and its subsidiaries
Conflict Minerals Policy – Hillenbrand, Inc. and its subsidiaries
Supplier Diversity Policy – Hillenbrand, Inc. and its subsidiaries
Hillenbrand, Inc. Insider Trading and Disclosure Policy
Hillenbrand, Inc. Clawback Policy


14
13


PROPOSAL NO. 1 – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

This section of the proxy statement introduces the current directors, including the fourthree directors in Class III who have been nominated to serve additional three-year terms and the two directors in Class III who have been nominated to serve additional one-year terms, consistent with their Class.

terms.

The Articles of Incorporation and the By-laws of Hillenbrand provide that directors of the Board are classified with respect to the terms that they serve by dividing them into three equal (or near-equal) Classes. Each director is elected to serve a three-year term (or the term applicable to his or her Class) and until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified, or until his or her earlier death, resignation, lawful removal, or failure to be re-elected in accordance with the Company’s By-laws.

The Board of Directors currently consists of eleventen directors, with fourthree directors in each of Class I and Class II and Class III and threefour directors in Class I.

III.6The terms of the directors expire as follows:

Class
ClassTerm Expires at
Class I2024 Annual Meeting
Class II20222025 Annual Meeting
Class III20232026 Annual Meeting

The fourthree directors in Class III who are nominated for election to the Board at the 20222024 Annual Meeting, each of whom has agreed to serve as a director if elected, are Gary L. Collar, F. Joseph Loughrey, Joy M. Greenway,Helen W. Cornell, Jennifer W. Rumsey, and Dennis W. Pullin. Dennis W. Pullin was elected by the Board as a director effective May 7, 2021, to serve for an interim term ending at the 2022 Annual Meeting.Stuart A. Taylor, II . Each of these directors has been nominated to serve a three-year term as required by our By-laws, but pursuant to the Company’s Board retirement policy, Mr. Loughrey will retire as a member of the Board not later than the 2023 Annual Meeting of shareholders.

Additionally, two directors in Class III are nominated for election to the Board at the 2022 Annual Meeting, each of whom has agreed to serve as a director if elected: Kimberly K. Ryan and Inderpreet Sawhney. Kimberly K. Ryan, President and Chief Executive Officer, was elected by the Board as a director effective December 30, 2021, to serve for an interim term ending at the 2022 Annual Meeting and to fill the Class III vacancy created upon the retirement of Joe A. Raver from the Board. Inderpreet Sawhney was elected by the Board as a director effective June 23, 2021, to serve for an interim term ending at the 2022 Annual Meeting and to fill the vacancy created upon the expansion of the size of the Board from ten to eleven directors in June 2021.

15By-laws.

The Board of Directors recommends that the shareholders vote FOR Proposal No. 1 to elect each of the sixthree nominees to the Board of Directors.

The Articles of Incorporation of Hillenbrand provide that in an uncontested election, directors are elected by a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting. This means that to be elected, the number of votes cast “for” a director nominee must exceed the number of votes “withheld” from that nominee.If you own shares through a bank, broker, or other holder of record, you must instruct your bank, broker, or other holder of record how to vote your shares in order for your vote to be counted on this Proposal. At the Annual Meeting, the proxies being solicited will be voted for no more than fourthe three nominees as Class II directors and two nominees as Class IIII directors.

Set forth below is information about all of our current directors, including the sixthree nominees for election at the 20222024 Annual Meeting of shareholders. The biographical information provided for each person includes all directorships held by and other relevant business experience of such person at any time during at least the past five years and, in some cases, directorships held prior to such five-year lookback.









16

6 As previously disclosed, in conformity with the Company’s director retirement policy, F. Joseph Loughrey, a former Class II Nominees for Electiondirector, retired from service as Directorsa member of the Board during fiscal year 2023. In connection with Terms Expiring in 2025

Mr. Loughrey’s retirement, the Board reduced the size of the Board to ten directors.
14


(GRAPHIC)

Gary L. Collar
   Director since 2015
Cornell, Helen_BW.jpg

Class I Nominees for Election as Directors with Terms Expiring in 2027

Helen W. Cornell
Independent
Age 65

Mr. Collar has served

Chairperson of the Board
Chairperson of the NCG Committee
CAREER HIGHLIGHTSKEY QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCES
Owensboro Grain Company, grain and soybean products (privately-owned).
Industrial Experience. More than twenty-two years as a director ofleader in global industrial manufacturing; her strong manufacturing background and global industrial expertise continues to benefit the Board, the Company, since May 2015. From January 2012 until his retirementand the shareholders as Hillenbrand works to execute its profitable growth strategy.

Corporate Finance. A certified public accountant (CPA) and certified management accountant (CMA) with a long tenure in October 2021, he servedoperations and finance, and experience interfacing with investors, including as the Senior Vice PresidentCFO of a major public company and General Manager of the Asia Pacific and Africa (APA) region for AGCO Corporation (“AGCO”), a world leader in the development, manufacture, and marketing of agricultural machinery and solutions. In connection with this role, he also served on the Board of Directors of Tractors and Farm Equipment Limited, an Indian tractor manufacturer and an investment of AGCO (from 2012–2021), and on the Global Board of Directors of AGCO Finance, Incorporated, a joint venture between AGCO and De Lage Landen Financial Services, which provides retail and wholesale financing services to AGCO customers globally (from 2016–2021). Previously he servedmost recently as AGCO’s Senior Vice President and General Manager of Europe, Africa, Middle East, Australia and New Zealand from 2004 to December 2011. Prior to that appointment, Mr. Collar was Vice President of Market Development, Worldwide for the Challenger Division, after joining AGCO in 2002.

Mr. Collar previously held various senior management positions within several divisions at ZF Friedrichshaven A.G. between 1994 and 2002. These assignments included President and CEO of the company’s joint venture producing steering systems for the North American automotive market,Owensboro Grain Company, as well as board experience with both a public and private company.


Risk Management and Oversight. Long record of managing risk as former CEO and President of Owensboro Grain Company and former CFO and Executive Vice President Business Development for the automotive group. Prior to this, he was employed by Caterpillar Incorporated.

The Board of Directors concluded that Mr. Collar should continue to serve as a director based on his deep internationalGardner Denver, Inc.


Strategic Thinking. Extensive experience particularly in Asia,strategic transactions and operations as an executive of several multinational companies, and his significant experience in financial analysis and controls.


(GRAPHIC)

Joy M. Greenway Director since 2013

Age 61

Ms. Greenway has served as a director of the Company since February 2013. She is the former Executive Director of Global Business Solutions at General Motors (automobiles), a position she held from September 2018 until March 2020. Ms. Greenway joined General Motors in June 2014 as Chief Financial Officer of Global Purchasing and Supply Chain, and in May 2017, she was named the Executive Director, Transformation, Global Business Services of General Motors. Prior to that, she served as Senior Vice President for Visteon Corporation (a Tier 1 automotive systems supplier), where she held a variety of positions from 2000 until 2013. Prior to joining Visteon, Ms. Greenway was employed as the Director, Manufacturing for United Technologies Corporation, a diversified aerospace and building company. Before United Technologies Corporation, Ms. Greenway was employed by GE Industrial Power Systems as a Materials Manager and served in various management positions at GE Aerospace/Martin Marietta. In October 2020, Ms. Greenway joined the Board of Directors of Electricfil Corporation, a privately owned company with headquarters in France, specializing in the design and manufacture of sensors and actuators for powertrain and transmissions, and served as senior advisor to the CEO from October 2020 until October 2021.

The Company’s Board of Directors concluded that Ms. Greenway should serve as a director based on her deep operations and global leadership experience, particularly in the manufacturing industry, and her experience as a senior executive of a Fortune 500 public company.

17

IMAGE OMITTED

F. Joseph LoughreyDirector since 2009

Age 72

Mr. Loughrey has served as a director of the Company since February 2009, and has been Chairperson of the Board since February 2013. In April 2009, he retired from Cummins Inc. (enginesBoard.


Mergers and related technology) after serving in a varietyAcquisitions. Leader of roles for 35 years, most recently as Vice Chair of the Board of Directorsmany mergers, acquisitions, financings, and as the company’s President and Chief Operating Officer. Mr. Loughrey served on the Board of Directors of Cummins from July 2005 until May 2009. Mr. Loughrey currently serves on a number of boards, including: Vanguard Group (an investment management company), where he serves on the Audit Committee, the Nominating Committee, and the Compensation Committee; Saint Anselm College, where he serves as Chair of the Board of Trustees; and the V Foundation for Cancer Research. He is past Chair and a current member of the Advisory Council to the College of Arts & Letters at The University of Notre Dame, where he also served as Chair of the Advisory Board to the Kellogg Institute for International Studies for six years.

Pursuant to the Company’s Board retirement policy, Mr. Loughrey will retireinvestments, including during her tenure as a member of the Board as of a date not later than the 2023 Annual Meeting of shareholders.  For more information on the Company’s Board retirement policy, please see the Company’s Corporate Governance Standards available on the Company’s web site at www.hillenbrand.com.

The Company’s Board of Directors concluded that Mr. Loughrey should serve as a director based on his service as President and Chief Operating Officer of a major public corporation and his continuing service on several public company and educational and nonprofit boards of directors.


Hillenbrand’s M&A Committee.
 (GRAPHIC)Dennis W. Pullin
Director since 2021
2015 to 2023

                                                                                                                                    Age 62

Mr. Pullin has served as a director of the Company since May 2021. Mr. Pullin is currently the President and Chief Executive Officer of Virtua Health, a not-for-profit integrated health system in New Jersey. Prior to joining Virtua Health, Mr. Pullin served from 2009 to 2017 as President of MedStar Harbor Hospital and Senior Vice President of MedStar Health. Prior to leading MedStar Harbor, Mr. Pullin was Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer at MedStar Washington Hospital Center in Washington, D.C. from 2006 to 2009. Prior to this role, Mr. Pullin held other leadership positions in hospitals, academic medical centers, physician group practices, and private industry.

Mr. Pullin is a Fellow of the American College of Healthcare Executives and has served on the New Jersey Hospital Association Board of Trustees since 2019 and the Chamber of Commerce Southern New Jersey Board of Directors since 2018.

The Company’s Board of Directors concluded that Mr. Pullin should serve as a director based on his deep leadership experience, including in mergers and acquisitions and digital transformation; his long tenure as a senior executive and chief executive officer of complex organizations; and his insights into and commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts.

18

Class III Nominees for Election as Directors with Terms Expiring in 2023

(GRAPHIC)

Kimberly K. Ryan

Director since 2021

                                                                                                                                   Age 55

Ms. Ryan has served as a director and as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company since December 2021. Prior to becoming Chief Executive Officer, Ms. Ryan was the Company’s Executive Vice President, beginning in June 2021. Prior to that role, she served as President of the Company’s Coperion business beginning in September 2015, also overseeing Hillenbrand’s Rotex business during part of that period.  She previously served as President of Batesville beginning in April 2011, at which time she was also named a Senior Vice President of Hillenbrand.  Ms. Ryan began her career with Batesville in 1989, holding positions of increasing responsibility within Batesville and the Company’s former parent in finance, strategy, operations, logistics, and information technology.

Since 2014, Ms. Ryan has also served on the Board of Directors of Kimball International, Inc., a public manufacturing company, including as a member of the Audit Committee. She also served as Board Chair from November 2018 to October 2021. She served on the Board of Directors of Conexus Indiana from December 2018 to July 2021.  

The Company’s Board of Directors concluded that Ms. Ryan should serve as a director because of her position as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, in addition to her years of experience as an executive of the Company’s Coperion and Batesville operating companies and her in-depth knowledge of the death care and process solutions industries.


 (GRAPHIC)Inderpreet SawhneyDirector since 2021

Age 57

Ms. Sawhney has served as a director of the Company since June 2021. Ms. Sawhney has been Group General Counsel and the Chief Compliance Officer of Infosys Ltd., a global leader in next-generation digital services since July 2017. Prior to joining Infosys, she worked from October 2011 to June 2017 as General Counsel of Wipro Limited, a large IT service company, and at The Chugh Firm, a private law firm, beginning in 1997 until October 2011, with her last position being as Managing Partner of the Silicon Valley office.

Ms. Sawhney also sits on the National Advisory Council of SABANA (South Asian Bar Association of North America), an organization of which she was President from 2008-2009.

The Company’s Board of Directors concluded that Ms. Sawhney should serve as a director based on her experience as a senior executive at large information technology firms and her in-depth knowledge of and exposure to technology, legal, compliance, and cyber matters.

19

Class I Directors with Terms Expiring in 2024

(GRAPHIC)

Helen W. Cornell Director since 2011

Age 63

Ms. Cornell has served as a director of the Company since August 2011. She is currently President and CEO (since December 2015) of the privately-owned Owensboro Grain Company (grain and soybean products), where she also serves as Chair of the Board and Chair of the Executive Committee. She is also a director of the privately-owned Dot Family Holdings, LLC (formerly Dot Foods, Inc.) (a food distributor), where she is a member of the Compensation Committee and Chair of the Audit Committee. In October 2018, Ms. Cornell joined the Board of Trustees of Brescia University, where she is a member of the Finance Committee. In November 2010, Ms. Cornell retired as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of

Gardner Denver, Inc. (n/k/a Ingersoll Rand), a leading global manufacturer of compressors, blowers, pumps, loading arms, and fuel systems for various industrial, medical, environmental, transportation, and process applications. During her 22-year tenure with Gardner Denver, Inc., Ms. Cornell served in various operating
1998 to 2010 CFO and financial roles, includingExecutive Vice President and General Manager
HILLENBRAND BOARD SERVICE
Since 2023Chairperson of the Fluid Transfer DivisionBoard
Since 2022Chairperson of the NCG Committee
2022 to 2023Vice Chairperson of the Board
2018 to 2022Chairperson of Compensation Committee
Since 2013Compensation Committee Member
2011 to 2023M&A Committee Member
2011 to 2013Audit Committee Member
Since 2011Director and Vice PresidentNCG Committee Member
OTHER BOARD SERVICE
Dot Family Holdings, LLC, a privately-owned food redistributor.
Since 2012Director, Chair of Strategic Planning. Until December 2016, Ms. Cornell served onCompensation Commitee, Audit Committee Member; past Chair of the Audit Committee
Brescia University, a private Catholic liberal arts college in Owensboro, Kentucky.
2018 to 2023Board of Trustees and Finance Committee MemberEDUCATION
Owensboro Grain Company.
MBA (Finance), Vanderbilt University

BS (Accounting), University of Kentucky
1998 to 2023Director, Chair of the Board, and Chair of Directors ofthe Executive Committee
The Alamo Group Inc. (agriculture, a global leader in design and other equipment), where she wasmanufacture of agricultural equipment for farms and ranches and infrastructure maintenance equipment for governmental and industrial markets.
2011 to 2016Director, Chair of the Audit Committee and a member of the Compensation Committee.

The Company’s Board of Directors concluded that Ms. Cornell should serve as a director based on her long tenure in operations and finance and her experience interfacing with investors, including as Chief Financial Officer of a major public company and most recently as President and Chief Executive Officer of Owensboro Grain Company, and her experience as a member of the board of both a public and private company.

Committee Member

15


 (GRAPHIC)
JRumsey.jpg
Jennifer W. Rumsey
Independent
 Director since 2020Age 50
CAREER HIGHLIGHTS

Age 48

Ms. Rumsey has served as a director of the Company since August 2020. Ms. Rumsey is currently President and Chief Operating Officer of KEY QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCES

Cummins, Inc. (“Cummins”), which designs, manufactures,designer, manufacturer, and sells a portfolioseller of innovative products, including components, engines, power generation, and digital solutions. Prior to Ms. Rumsey’s election to this role in March 2021, she served as Vice President
Innovation/Technology. Deep technological background and President, Components Business Segment from October 2019 until March 2021. Prior to that, Ms. Rumsey served as Vice President, Chief Technical Officer of Cummins, from October 2015 until October 2019. Since November 2000, Ms. Rumsey has held various technical roles in research, technology, and product development and other positions of increasing responsibility at Cummins.

Ms. Rumsey currently serves as a member of the Purdue College of Engineering Advisory Council (since October 2016). She previously served as a member of the United States Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Advisory Council (November 2019 until January 2021). Ms. Rumsey holds a Bachelor of Science degree from Purdue University and a Master of Science in Mechanical Engineering from Massachusetts Institute of Technology. She is Six Sigma certified.

The Company’s Board of Directors concluded that Ms. Rumsey should serve as a director based on her deep operations and technological experience, particularly given her tenure as a senior technical executive of a Fortune 500 public industrial manufacturing company, including in product life cycle responsibility, from advanced research to current product support, in engineering and product quality, and in multiple business areas.


Sustainability/ESG. Current CEO and President of a global leader providing power solutions that both meet business needs and have large-scale environmental impact; previously as Cummins CTO, led strategic investments in key technologies and applications to transition to lower carbon emissions products.

Continuous Improvement (Lean, Six Sigma). Six Sigma certified, including extensive knowledge, professional skills, and experience in improving performance, increasing profits, and decreasing errors.

Operations (Manufacturing, Service). Experience overseeing strategic direction, growth initiatives, and global operations including as President and CEO of a Fortune 500 public industrial manufacturing company.


Industrial Experience. Decades of experience in highly technical fields at a Fortune 500 public industrial manufacturing company in a variety of technical and operational functions.

Since 2022
President and CEO

2021 to 2022
President and Chief Operating Officer

2019 to 2021
Vice President and President, Components Business Segment

2015 to 2019
Vice President, Chief Technical Officer

HILLENBRAND BOARD SERVICE
Since 2020

Director, NCG Committee Member, and Compensation Committee Member

OTHER BOARD SERVICE
College of Engineering at Purdue University, a public land-grant research university in West Lafayette, Indiana.
2016 to 2022Advisory Council Member
Cummins, Inc.
Since 2023Chair
Since 2022
Director

US Department of Energy (“DOE”) Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technical Advisory Committee, established under the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to advise the Secretary of Energy on hydrogen research, development, and demonstration efforts.
2019 to 2021Advisory Council MemberEDUCATION
MS (Mechanical Engineering), Massachusetts Institute of Technology

BS (Mechanical Engineering), Purdue University

20
16



(GRAPHIC)

Stewart AT.jpg
Stuart A. Taylor, IIII.
Independent
 Director since 2008
Age 63
Chairperson of the M&A Committee
CAREER HIGHLIGHTS

Age 61

Mr. Taylor has served as a director of the Company since September 2008. Since 2001, Mr. Taylor has been the Chief Executive Officer of KEY QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCES

The Taylor Group, LLC, a private equity firm focused on creating and acquiring businesses. He has previously held positions
Mergers and Acquisitions. Thirty years of investment banking experience as Senior Managing Directora leader in financings, mergers, acquisitions, investments, and strategic transactions, including a career at several large investment banking firms and running a private investment management company.

Strategic Thinking. More than two decades as CEO and owner of private equity firm, evaluating strategic investments and transactions and managing risk.

Corporate Finance. Extensive experience supervising business operations, including providing strategic and financial advisory and investment banking services to public and private companies, as well as supervisory authority over the Taylor Group’s principal financial and accounting officers on all financial matters.

Risk Management and Oversight. Decades of experience as CEO with ultimate responsibility for risk-adjusted decision making and oversight of risk management.

Human Resources. Extensive experience managing employees as CEO, and serving on Human Resources and Compensation Committees of multiple boards of directors for both public and private companies.

Since 2001CEO
Bear, Stearns, & Co. Inc., a global brokerage and investment banking firm (acquired by JPMorgan Chase & Co. in 2008).
1999 to 2001Senior Managing Director
CIBC World Markets, an investment banking firm based out of Canada.
1996 to 1999Managing Director of CIBC World Markets and head of its Global Automotive Group and Capital Goods Group. He also served as Group
Banker’s Trust, a privately-owned financial institution.
1993 to 1996Managing Director of the Automotive Industry Group at Bankers Trust following a ten-year position in corporate finance at Morgan Stanley & Co. Mr. Taylor has been a member
HILLENBRAND BOARD SERVICE
Since 2012Member and Chairperson of the Board of Directors of M&A Committee
2009 to 2018Audit Committee Member
2008 to 2009;
Since 2019
Compensation Committee Member
Since 2008Director, NCG Committee Member
OTHER BOARD SERVICEEDUCATION
Ball Corporation (a, a diversified manufacturer) sincemanufacturer.
MBA (Finance), Harvard

BA (History), Yale
Since 1999 where he currently serves as lead independent director (since April 2019)Director, current Lead Independent Director and Chair of the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee. He has also been a member of the Board of Directors of NCG Committee, Human Resources Committee Member
Wabash National Corporation, a provider of engineered solutions for the transportation, logistics and distribution industries, since Augustindustries.
Since 2019 and serves on theDirector, Member, Audit and Compensation Committees. In addition, in October 2020, Mr. Taylor was appointed to the board of directors of Committees
Solenis, LLC, a global producer of specialty chemicals for water-intensive industries, where he serves on theindustries.
Since 2020Director and Compensation Committee. Mr. Taylor was previously a member of the Board of Directors of Committee Member
Essendant, Inc. formerly known as, (f/k/a United Stationers, Inc.), a wholesale distributor of business products, from products.
2011 until its sale to Staples Inc.2019Director
17


GaryLC.jpg
Class II Directors with Terms Expiring in January 2019.

The2025



Gary L. Collar
Independent
Age 67
Chairperson of the Compensation Committee
CAREER HIGHLIGHTSKEY QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCES
AGCO Corporation, a world leader in the development, manufacture, and marketing of agricultural machinery and solutions.
International Business/Global Markets. International business leader at Fortune 500 company with proven expertise within the manufacturing industry and extensive experience leading, managing, and overseeing global operations.

Human Resources. Considerable experience managing and overseeing labor and human relations risks globally, as well as service as Chairperson of the Company’s BoardCompensation and Management Development Committee.

Strategic Thinking. Experience providing strategic direction while overseeing global development and manufacturing at AGCO.

Operations (Manufacturing, Service). Decades of Directors concluded that Mr. Taylor should servesenior executive experience in the industrial sector at global public companies.

Industrial Experience. Career devoted to serving as a directorsenior executive to global public and private manufacturing companies, as well as board service at Tractor and Farm Equipment Limited.

2012 to 2021Senior Vice President and General Manager of the Asia Pacific and Africa (APA) Region
2004 to 2011Senior Vice President and General Manager of Europe, Africa, Middle East, Australia, and New Zealand
2002 to 2003
Vice President of Worldwide Market Development, Challenger Division

ZF Friedrichshaven A.G., a leader in development and manufacture of advanced technology automotive chassis and power train systems.
2001 to 2002Vice President of Business Development, ZF Group NAO
1995 to 2001President and CEO, Zua Autoparts Joint Venture
HILLENBRAND BOARD SERVICE
Since 2022Chairperson of the Compensation Committee
Since 2015
Compensation Committee Member

Since 2015
Director and NCG Committee Member

OTHER BOARD SERVICEEDUCATION
Tractors and Farm Equipment Limited, a tractor manufacturer and an investment of AGCO, based in India.
BS (Business Administration and Marketing Management), California State University – East Bay
2012 to 2021Director
AGCO Finance, Inc., a joint venture between AGCO and De Lage Landen Financial Services, which provides retail and wholesale financing services to AGCO customers globally.
2016 to 2021Global Director
18


JoyMG.jpg
Joy M. Greenway
Independent
Age 63

CAREER HIGHLIGHTSKEY QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCES
General Motors, a global motor vehicle manufacturer headquartered in the USA.
Operations (Manufacturing, Service). Extensive profit and loss leadership experience in businesses requiring long-term financial planning, successfully impacting top- and bottom-line results.

Continuous Improvement (Lean, Six Sigma). Experience operating above industry market growth rates reinforcing existing strategic customer business, capitalizing on hisglobal footprint, investing in technology, and creating synergistic corporate infrastructures.

International Business/Global Markets. Global operational and multicultural experience, building relationships throughout Asia, Eastern and Western Europe, and the Americas, with several leading investment firms, his ongoingexpertise in Asia and growth markets.

Industrial Experience. Decades of leadership experience in global industrial manufacturing, including senior executive roles at Fortune 500 companies.

Innovation/Technology. Deep technological and innovation background and experience, particularly as an executive of a Fortune 500 public industrial company.

2018 to 2020Executive Director Global Business Solutions
2017 to 2018Executive Director Transformation, Global Business Services
2014 to 2017CFO, Global Purchasing and Supply Chain
Visteon Corporation, a tier one automotive supplier.
2005 to 2013Vice President and President of Climate
2000 to 2005
Director, Strategic Business Unit, Customer Business Unit, Powertrain

United Technologies Corporation, a diversified aerospace and building company.
1995 to 2000
Director, Operations

GE Industrial Power Systems, a world energy leader providing technology, solutions, and services across the entire energy value chain from the point of generation to consumption.
1994 to 1995Director, Materials
HILLENBRAND BOARD SERVICEEDUCATION
Since 2013


Director, Audit Committee Member, and NCG Committee Member
MBA, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
 MS (Mechanical Engineering), Syracuse University
BS (Industrial Education Engineering), University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign

OTHER BOARD SERVICE
Electricfil Corporation, a company headquartered in France specializing in the private design and manufacture of sensors and actuators for powertrain and transmissions.
2020 to 2021Director and Senior Advisor to Chairman and President
19


DennisWP.jpg
Dennis W. Pullin
Independent
Age 64

CAREER HIGHLIGHTSKEY QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCES
Virtua Health, a not-for-profit academic health system in New Jersey.
Sustainability/ESG. Insight and commitment to sustainability and to diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts demonstrated by leadership at Virtua Health, emphasizing core values, equity, and inclusion, and supporting sustainability initiatives; and promoting gender equality among Virtua Health’s leadership.

Strategic Thinking. Deep leadership and strategic experience, including customer service focus and digital transformation, and Virtua Health's “Hospital at Home” program, transforming the patient experience.

Cyber / Information Security. Years of information security oversight and knowledge gained as a memberhospital system senior executive responsible for protecting patients’ health information while complying with applicable privacy laws and policies.

Risk Management and Oversight. Extensive background in senior management as an executive at large, diverse organizations with elevated risk profiles.

Mergers and Acquisitions. Extensive leadership experience in mergers and acquisitions demonstrated at a variety of public companydynamic organizations.

Since 2017President and other boards,CEO
MedStar Harbor, a not-for-profit, community-based health care organization comprising ten major hospitals and his broad mergertwenty-five integrated businesses in U. S. Mid-Atlantic region.
2009 to 2017 President of MedStar Harbor Hospital
MedStar Washington Hospital Center, largest private teaching and acquisition experience.

researching hospital based in Washington, D.C.
2006 to 2009COO and Senior Vice President
CHI St. Luke’s Health, a tertiary community teaching hospital in the Texas Medical Center.
2002 to 2006Vice President of Operations and Business Development
HILLENBRAND BOARD SERVICE
Since 2021

Director, Compensation Committee Member, and NCG Committee Member

OTHER BOARD SERVICE
New Jersey Hospital Association, an organization serving healthcare groups to identify savings opportunities, reduce costs, and provide affordable and flexible education programs.
Since 2019DirectorEDUCATION
Chamber of Commerce Southern New Jersey, a member-driven organization that advocates for economic prosperity.
Certificate for Post-Graduate Studies in Cardiac Rehabilitation, Baylor College of Medicine
MS (Physiology), Texas A&M University
BA (Biology), Texas Lutheran University

Since 2018Director
Healthcare for the Homeless, a non-profit advocating for affordable housing and providing health care services to the homeless.
2013 to 2017Director

21
20



Class III Directors with Terms Expiring in 2023

(GRAPHIC)

DanielCH.jpg
Class III Directors with Terms Expiring in 2026
Daniel C. Hillenbrand
Independent
 Director since 2018Age 57
CAREER HIGHLIGHTS

Age 55

Mr. Hillenbrand has served as a director of the Company since May 2018. Mr. Hillenbrand is the Founder and Managing Partner of KEY QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCES

Clear Water Capital Partners, LLC, a private diversified venture capital firm.
Strategic Thinking. Decades of operational and investment experience with responsibility for evaluating and pursuing attractive strategic opportunities.

Operations (Manufacturing, Service). Long tenure and deep board and executive experience in private manufacturing companies.

Risk Management and Oversight. Managing partner of various investment firms, including founder of diversified investment firm a position he has held since 2010. leveraging expertise in crisis management, strategy, and business development in the context of risk mitigation.

Mergers and Acquisitions. Extensive experience, including at Clear Water Capital Partners, overseeing and assessing the performance of companies with respect to mergers and acquisitions.

Continuous Improvement (Lean, Six Sigma). Accomplished leader in Lean manufacturing principles, as well as business and brand development; experience creating and driving rapid value appreciation in sourcing, distribution, logistics, and e-commerce.

Since 2002, he has also been the2010Founder and Managing Partner of
Generations, L.P., an investment management company, as well as the company.
Since 2002Managing Partner of
Legacy Company, a real estate investment company. Mr. Hillenbrand previously served as Chair of the Board (2004-2019) and President and Chief Executive Officer (2005-2007) of Nambé, LLC, a leading international high-end consumer products company, as well as Vice Chair of the Board of Pri Pak, Inc., a provider of name-brand and private label contract beverage manufacturing services, from 2009-2017. He also previously held various leadership roles at
Since 2022Managing Partner
Able Manufacturing and Assembly, LLC, a manufacturing company with platforms in metal fabrication, fiberglass composites, and plastic thermoform manufacturing, including as manufacturing.
2013 to 2019,CEO
2002 to 2007
2013 to 2014President
Nambé, LLC, a leading international high-end consumer products company.
2005 to 2007President and CEO
HILLENBRAND BOARD SERVICE

Since 2018

Director, Audit Committee Member, and NCG Committee Member
OTHER BOARD SERVICEEDUCATION
Spring Grove Cemeteries, National Historic Landmark and cemetery serving the residents of Cincinnati and surrounding communities.
MBA, Northwestern University
 BA (Political Science), Boston College

Since 2023Director
Nambé, LLC
2004 to 2019Chair of the Board (2002-2021)
Pri Pak, Inc., President (2013-2014),a provider of name brand and Chief Executive Officer (2002-2007private label contract beverage manufacturing services.
2009 to 2017Vice Chair of the Board
Able Manufacturing and 2013-2019).

PriorAssembly, LLC

2002 to that, Mr. Hillenbrand served in various roles with increasing leadership responsibility at Wealthsense, Inc., Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. (the Company’s former parent), Abbott Laboratories, and Batesville Casket Company, Inc.

The Company’s2021

Chair of the Board of Directors concluded that Mr. Hillenbrand should serve as a director based on his long tenure as a managing partner of investment firms and his deep Board and executive experience in private manufacturing companies.


21


(GRAPHIC)

NeilSN.jpg
Neil S. Novich
Independent
 Director since 2010
Age 69
Chairperson of the Audit Committee
CAREER HIGHLIGHTS

Age 67

Mr. Novich has served as a director of the Company since February 2010. He is the former Chair and President and Chief Executive Officer of KEY QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCES

Ryerson, Inc., a global metals distributor and fabricator. Mr. Novich joined Ryerson in 1994
Risk Management and Oversight. Former Chair/CEO and board member of Fortune 500 public companies with an understanding of critical success factors for mitigation and executive management of risk.

Operations (Manufacturing Experience). Deep engagement, as Chief Operating Officer and was named President and CEO, in 1995. He servedRyerson’s distribution and fabrication operations, both domestic and international, striving for continuous operations improvement, while providing overall leadership, following more than a decade with a major management consulting firm focused on optimizing strategy development and execution for clients, including marketing, operations, sales, and technology.

Strategic Thinking. Orientation for high engagement in the Boardboard room; recognized for providing innovative strategic insights that support enhanced growth and well-functioning strategic systems.

Cyber/Information Security; Information Technology. Significant experience providing oversight to these functions as Chair of Audit Committee at Hillenbrand, with background knowledge derived from continuing education and certificates in highly analytical subjects.

Human Resources. Leadership experience at Bain and Ryerson from 1994 untilwith responsibility for large teams; significant boardroom experience in executive compensation and other human resources topics.
1999 to 2007 adding Chair to his title in 1999. He remained ChairChairperson, President and CEO until 2007, when the company was sold. Prior
1994 to his time at Ryerson, Mr. Novich spent 13 years with 1999President and CEO
1994 to 1996Chief Operating Officer
Bain &and Company, an international management consulting firm, where he spent several years as a partner. He currently serves onfirm.
1981 to 1994Partner
HILLENBRAND BOARD SERVICE
Since 2019Chairperson of the BoardsAudit Committee
Since 2018Audit Committee Member
Since 2013M&A Committee Member
2013 to 2018Chairperson of the Compensation Committee
2010 to 2018Compensation Committee Member
Since 2010Director and NCG Committee Member
OTHER BOARD SERVICE
Beacon Roofing Supply, (aa distributor of residential and non-residential roofing materials), where he chairs thematerials.
Since 2012Director; Chair, Compensation Committee; and W.W. Grainger, Inc. (an industrial supply company), where he is a member of theCommittee (since 2018); past Chair, Audit Committee and Board Affairs and Nominating Committee. He is also
Analog Devices, Inc., a member of the Cyber Security Ad Hoc Committee. Mr. Novich is also a trustee of the Field Museum of National History and life trustee of Children’s Home & Aid in Chicago and is a member of the Executive Council of global semiconductor leader.
2008 to 2020
Director; Member, Audit Committee; past Chair, Compensation Committee

American Securities, a private equity fund. Mr. Novich previously served on
EDUCATION
Since 2004
Member, Executive Council

MS (Management), Massachusetts Institute of Technology
MS (Nuclear Engineering), Massachusetts Institute of Technology
BS (Physics), Harvard University
WW. Grainger, Inc., an industrial supply company.
Since 1999Director; Member, Audit and Nominating and Governance Committees; past Chair and Member, Compensation Committee
Field Museum of Natural History, a Chicago museum.
Since 1999Trustee, Former Chair of Research and Technology Committees
Ryerson, Inc.
1994 to 2007
Director; Chairperson of the Board (since 1999)

22


KimberlyKR.jpg
Kimberly K. Ryan
Not Independent
Age 57
President and CEO
CAREER HIGHLIGHTSKEY QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCES
Hillenbrand, Inc.
Risk Management and Oversight. Decades of senior management experience addressing risks as an executive, as well as oversight of overall company risk management as Chairperson of the Board of Directors of Analog Devices,Kimball International, Inc.
Corporate Finance. A leader in finance, with extensive experience beginning early career at Hill-Rom, as well as CEO and Board Chair at Kimball, and continuing through tenure as President of Coperion, Hillenbrand's largest business.
Industrial Experience. Deep knowledge of process solutions industries as well as broad-based business, international manufacturing, operations, and procurement experience, including in business-to-business product sales and services for a variety of global industries; service since 1989 in positions of increasing responsibility in finance, strategy, operations, logistics, and information technology at the Company and Hill-Rom (the Company’s former parent company).
Information Technology. Experience leading information technology teams from 2008 until 2020, where he wasearly career to present, including leadership of enterprise resource planning system project at Hill-Rom and board and executive roles overseeing IT.
Cyber/Information Security. Cyber and information security fluency from decades of exposure to this topic, including as Senior Vice President of Information Technology and Office of Program Leadership at Hill-Rom.
Since 2021President and CEO
2021Executive Vice President
2015 to 2021President of Coperion and Senior Vice President of Hillenbrand
2011 to 2015
President of Batesville and Senior Vice President of Hillenbrand

Hill-Rom, Inc., a leading global provider of medical equipment and services.
2006 to 2011Senior Vice President, Post Acute Care Division
2005 to 2006Senior Vice President, Information Technology and Office of Program Leadership
2003 to 2005Vice President, Shared Services
HILLENBRAND BOARD SERVICE
Since 2021Director
OTHER BOARD SERVICE
Kimball International, Inc., a public manufacturing company in the Chairfurniture industry.
2014 to 2023Director and Member of Audit Committee
2018 to 2021
Chairperson of the Board, Member of Compensation Committee and Governance Committees

National Association of Manufacturers, a membermanufacturing industrial trade association.
Since 2022Director
Iowa State University, College of Business, a public land-grant institution.
Since 2022Deans Advisory Board CouncilEDUCATION
Conexus Indiana, an Indiana non-profit organization advancing manufacturing and logistics for business and educators.
BA (Accounting), Iowa State University
2018 to 2021Director
23


InderpreetS.jpg
Inderpreet Sawhney
Independent
Age 59
CAREER HIGHLIGHTSKEY QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCES
Infosys Ltd., a global leader in next-generation digital services.
Cyber/Information Security; Information Technology. Experienced general counsel and senior executive at large information technology firms with in-depth knowledge of and exposure to technology, legal, compliance, and cyber matters.

Risk Management and Oversight. Extensive experience overseeing risk associated with the development and growth of digital services including cyber security, technology, and compliance risks from a legal standpoint.

Strategic Thinking. Experience navigating organizations through various high-profile strategic issues, such as employee and customer safety, business continuity, and diversity and inclusion initiatives.

Sustainability/ESG. Track record of executing sustainability initiatives in the context of compliance, equity, and inclusion, in particular as Chief Compliance Officer of Infosys Ltd.

Mergers and Acquisitions. Wide experience in mergers, acquisitions, and strategic transactions as general counsel at large, diverse organizations.

International Business/Global Markets. Extensive international experience with a focus on India, including World Economic Forum, Co-Chair of Global Future Council on Good Governance.
Since 2017General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer
Wipro Limited, a leading technology services and consulting company with capabilities in consulting, design, engineering, and operations.
2011 to 2017Senior Vice President and General Counsel
The Chugh Firm, a private law firm.
1997 to 2011Managing Partner of the Silicon Valley Office
HILLENBRAND BOARD SERVICE
Since 2023

M&A Committee Member

Since 2021

Director, Audit Committee.

The Company’s BoardCommittee Member, and NCG Committee Member


OTHER BOARD SERVICE
SABANA (South Asian Bar Association of Directors concludedNorth America), organization encouraging professional growth and advocating for equal rights and access to justice for South Asian community.
Since 2019Advisory Council Member
Infosys Foundation USA, a nonprofit organization that Mr. Novich should serve as a director based on his service as Presidentaims to expand computer science education and CEO of a major public corporation and his several years of experience as a partner with a major consulting firm, together with his extensive and continuing service on the boards of several public companies and non-profit organizations.

training, particularly in underrepresented communities.
Since 2022ChairEDUCATION
Since 2021Trustee
LLM, Queens University
LLB, Delhi University
BS (Economics), Delhi University, Lady Shriram College

22
24





Skills and Experience Matrix. The graph below summarizes the Skills and Experience Matrix that our Board uses to align its composition with the Company’s strategic priorities and to identify key skills and experiences most relevant to decisions about Board composition. The graph presents the areas for which the Board relies on individual directors, given their relatively deep background in the area, and the number of directors with such background in each area. This presentation does not mean that some directors lack certain skills or experiences, but rather that other directors have relatively deeper expertise. EachThe director and director nominee biographybiographies above describesfurther showcase the diversity of our Board and each person’s qualifications and relevant experience in more detail.

(GRAPHIC)

3989
23
25


THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND COMMITTEES

The Company’s business is managed under the direction of its Board of Directors. In this section of the proxy statement, we describe the general and certain specific responsibilities of the Board of Directors and its committees, our governance practices, and how you can communicate with the Board or with individual directors.

Board’s Responsibilities

The Board of Directors is the ultimate decision-making body of the Company, except with respect to those matters reserved to the shareholders. The Board acts as an advisor and counselor to senior management and oversees and monitors management’s performance. The Board also oversees the Company’s management of risk involved or potentially involved in the Company’s business.

Board Leadership Structure and Role in Risk Oversight

The Corporate Governance Standards for our Board of Directors provide that the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) cannot also serve as the Chairperson of the Board. At all times since the Company’s formation, the positions of CEO and Chairperson of the Board have been held by separate individuals. Our Board believes that the separation of these two positions is the most appropriate leadership structure for the Company at this time because it enables us to benefit from the expertise, experience, and strengths of both of the individuals holding those key leadership positions in the Company.

Our CEO, Kimberly K. Ryan, began serving as a director beginning in December 2021, in connection with becoming the Company’s President and CEO. BeforeDuring the transition to becoming CEO, she served as the Company’s Executive Vice President beginning in June 2021. Prior to that role, she served as President of the Company’s Coperion business beginning in September 2015, also overseeing Hillenbrand’s Rotex business during part of that period. She served as President of the Company’s recently-divested Batesville business for four years before that, and was named a Senior Vice President of Hillenbrand in 2011. Before these executive roles, she also held a variety of leadership positions at the Company’s former parent company. The Chairperson of the Board, F. Joseph Loughrey,Helen W. Cornell, has extensive executive management and board of director experience, as further described in hisher biographical information set forth under the heading “Proposal No. 1 – Election of Directors” above.

Ms. Cornell also served as the Vice Chairperson of the Board during fiscal 2022 in preparation for the retirement of our previous Chairperson, F. Joseph Loughrey, in January 2023.

The Board of Directors has direct responsibility for overseeing the Company’s exposure to risk. As a part of its responsibility, the Board satisfies itself that the risk management processes implemented by management are aligned with the Company’s overall strategy and are functioning as directed, and that an appropriate culture of risk-adjusted decision-making exists throughout the organization. At each meeting of the Board of Directors, the Board evaluates any new material risks to the Company in discussions with management. The Board periodically consults with outside advisors and experts on risk management matters, and through the Audit Committee, receives regular reports from the Company’s Chief Compliance Officer, Chief Information Officer, and Chief Information Security Officer. No less than once each year, management makes a formal presentation to the entire Board of Directors that describes all significant risks of the Company, to apprise the Board of the overall risk profile of the Company and to help ensure that such risks are being properly
26


mitigated and managed. The Board also receives annual updates on the Company’s cybersecurity program.

24

In addition, the Compensation and Management Development Committee (the “Compensation Committee”) analyzes and manages risks related to our compensation policies and practices, and the Audit Committee performs the same role with respect to financial- and cyber-related risks facing the Company. The Compensation Committee’s risk management efforts are discussed under Part V of the “Executive Compensation” section of this proxy statement.

The

In particular, the Audit Committee, in accordance with its Charter, fulfills its risk management oversight responsibilities by discussing with senior management “the Company’s guidelines and policies that govern the process by which the Company assesses and manages the Company’s exposure to risks… and the steps management has taken to monitor and control such exposures.” Additional details on the Audit Committee’s risk management duties can be found in its Charter, available on the Company’s web site at www.hillenbrand.com or in print to any shareholder who requests copies through the Company’s Investor Relations Department.

Meetings of the Board and Committees

A proposed agenda for each regularly scheduled Board meeting is developed by the Chairperson of the Board, with assistance from the Vice Chairperson of the Board (when serving), and the Company’s CEO, together with the members of management that the Chairperson or CEO may select. The proposed agenda is circulated to each director for review and comment before it is finalized. Proposed agenda items that fall within the scope of responsibilities of a Board committee are initially developed by the chairperson of that committee with management assistance, as appropriate. Each committee’s chairperson also develops, with the assistance of management, a proposed agenda for each regularly scheduled meeting of that committee. Board and committee materials related to agenda items are provided to Board and committee members sufficiently in advance of meetings (typically one week) to allow the directors to prepare for discussion of the items at the meetings.

At the invitation of the Board and its committees, members of senior management and outside advisors attend Board and committee meetings or portions thereof for the purpose of reporting on specific agenda items and participating in discussions. Generally, discussions of matters to be considered by the Board and its committees are facilitated by the manager responsible for that function or area of the Company’s operations. In addition, directors have free access to all other members of management and employees of the Company. As necessary and appropriate in their discretion, the Board and its committees consult with independent legal, financial, human resource, compensation, accounting, and accountingother advisors to assist in their duties to the Company and its shareholders.

The chairpersons of the committees of the Board preside over the portions of Board meetings in which the principal items to be considered are within the scope of the authority of their respective committees.

Executive sessions, which are meetings of non-employee directors without management present, are held after each Board meeting, and after each committee meeting as scheduled by the chairpersons of the respective committees. The Chairperson of the Board generally presides at executive sessions of the Board and may be assisted by the Vice Chairperson (when serving), while the chairpersons of the committees preside at executive sessions of their committees or at Board
27


executive sessions in which the principal items to be considered are within the scope of the authority of their respective committees.

25

Governance Matters

Corporate Governance. Both the Board of Directors and management of the Company are firmly committed to good and accountable corporate governance and believe that an attentive, performing Board is a tangible competitive advantage. To that end, the Board of Directors has taken measures aimed at continued high standards for corporate governance. Specifically, the Board has adopted:


1.Position specifications, including performance criteria, for its members, the Chairperson of the Board, and the chairpersons of the standing Board committees. These position specifications are discussed in more detail under the heading “Board Composition, Experience, and Skills” below.


2.Corporate Governance Standards for the Board that, among other important directives, require that at least 80 percent of the directors be independent and describe the Board’s diversity policy, which is discussed in more detail under the heading “Board Composition, Experience, and Skills” below. The Corporate Governance Standards also require each non-employee director to hold shares of the Company’s common stock in an amount equal to five times the director’s annual cash compensation by the fifth anniversary of his or her election to the Board. The Board regularly discusses and reviews the Corporate Governance Standards and also general principles of corporate governance to evaluate whether it can improve upon the practices and procedures of the Company.


3.A Code of Ethical Business Conduct that is applicable to the Board and all employees of the Company and its subsidiaries, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Chief Accounting Officer. No waivers of the requirements of our Code of Ethical Business Conduct were granted during fiscal 2021. The Company plans to disclose amendments or waivers, if any, of the Code of Ethical Business Conduct on its web site at www.hillenbrand.com.


4.An Insider Trading and Disclosure Policy, which applies to all employees and directors. This policy promotes sound corporate citizenship and includes, among other provisions, anti-hedging and anti-pledging provisions with respect to the Company’s securities. Additional discussion of the Company’s anti-hedging and anti-pledging policies follows under the heading “Part VII – Anti-Hedging and Anti-Pledging” below.


5.A limit on the total annual base compensation for non-employee directors of $600,000, approved by the Company’s shareholders as part of the Amended and Restated Hillenbrand, Inc. Stock Incentive Plan (the “Stock Plan”). See the discussion under the heading “Compensation of Directors” below for additional details.

1.Position specifications, including performance criteria, for its members, the Chairperson of the Board, the Vice Chairperson of the Board, and the chairpersons of the standing Board committees. These position specifications are discussed in more detail under the heading “Board Composition, Experience, and Skills” below.
2.Corporate Governance Standards for the Board that, among other important directives, require that at least 80 percent of the directors be independent and describe the Board’s diversity policy, which is discussed in more detail under the heading “Board Composition, Experience, and Skills” below. The Corporate Governance Standards also require each non-employee director to hold shares of the Company’s common stock in an amount equal to five times the director’s annual cash compensation by the fifth anniversary of his or her election to the Board. The Board regularly discusses and reviews the Corporate Governance Standards and also general principles of corporate governance to evaluate whether it can improve upon the practices and procedures of the Company.
3.A Code of Ethical Business Conduct that is applicable to the Board and all employees of the Company and its subsidiaries, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Chief Accounting Officer. No waivers of the requirements of our Code of Ethical Business Conduct were granted during fiscal 2023. The Company plans to disclose on its web site amendments or waivers, if any, of the Code of Ethical Business Conduct.
4.An Insider Trading and Disclosure Policy, which applies to all employees and directors. This policy promotes sound corporate citizenship and includes, among other provisions, anti-hedging and anti-pledging provisions with respect to the Company’s securities. Additional discussion of the Company’s anti-hedging and anti-pledging policies follows under the heading “Part VII – Anti-Hedging and Anti-Pledging” below.
5.A limit on the total annual base compensation for non-employee directors of $600,000, approved by the Company’s shareholders as part of the Amended and Restated Hillenbrand, Inc. Stock Incentive Plan (the “Stock Plan”). See the discussion under the heading “Compensation of Directors” below for additional details.
6.A Related Person Transactions Policy that, consistent with New York Stock Exchange rules, authorizes the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee (the “NCG Committee”) and NCG Committee Chair to review potential related person transactions and requires pre-approval of transactions actually involving related persons, regardless of the size of the transaction.
28


The Company’s Corporate Governance Standards and Code of Ethical Business Conduct are available in print to any shareholder who requests copies through the Company’s Investor Relations Department and, along with the position specifications, are available on the Company’s web site at www.hillenbrand.com.

26

As part of our commitment to good corporate governance, we annually reach out to key shareholders to discuss a variety of sustainability, corporate governance, and executive compensation topics. This annual outreach program also provides an opportunity for our management to understand and examine the issues that matter most to our shareholders. In prior years, this outreach has covered topics such as Company strategy; the value of a shareholder right to amend the By-laws; executive compensation matters; andcorporate governance matters; the progress of our sustainability program.program; and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the Company’s business, policies, practices, and employees. Our management and directors consider the feedback from these meetings, along with market best practices, policies at peer companies, and our specific circumstances, in making decisions and recommendations regarding our overall governance profile.

Board Composition, Experience, and Skills. The members of our Board have been selected with an emphasis on independence and the mix of characteristics, experiences, and diverse perspectives and skills most appropriate for the Company, as illustrated by the Skills and Experience Matrix described under the heading “Skills and Experience Matrix” above. The Nominating/Corporate GovernanceNCG Committee (the “NCG Committee”) usesregularly refreshes this Skills and Experience Matrix. The NCG Committee uses the Matrix as a guide when evaluating the breadth and depth of the Board’s skills and experience relative to the Company’s business strategy and when considering director nominees. Understanding the importance of Board composition and refreshment for effective oversight, the NCG Committee strives to maintain an appropriate balance of diversity, skills, and experience on the Board.

Position Specifications. As mentioned above, the Board has adopted position specifications applicable to individual directors, and nominees to the Board recommended by the NCG Committee must meet the qualifications set forth in those position specifications. The specifications provide that a candidate for director should never have (i) been the subject of an SEC enforcement action in which he or she consented to the entry of injunctive relief, a cease and desist order, or a suspension or other limitation on the ability to serve as a corporate officer or supervisor; (ii) had any license suspended or revoked due to misconduct of any type; or (iii) violated any fiduciary duty to the Company or any provision of the Code of Ethical Business Conduct. Additionally, each director and nominee should exhibit the following characteristics:


Have a reputation for industry, integrity, honesty, candor, fairness, and discretion;


Be an acknowledged expert in his or her chosen field(s) of endeavor, which area of expertise should have some relevance to the Company’s businesses or operations;


Be knowledgeable, or be willing and able to quickly become knowledgeable, in the critical aspects of the Company’s businesses and operations;


Be experienced and skillful in serving as a competent overseer of, and trusted advisor to, senior management of a substantial publicly held corporation; and


For non-employee directors, meet the New York Stock Exchange independence standards then in effect.

Have a reputation for industry, integrity, honesty, candor, fairness, and discretion;
Be an acknowledged expert in his or her chosen field(s) of endeavor, which area of expertise should have some relevance to the Company’s businesses or operations;
Be knowledgeable, or be willing and able to quickly become knowledgeable, in the critical aspects of the Company’s businesses and operations;
Be experienced and skillful in serving as a competent overseer of, and trusted advisor to, senior management of a substantial publicly held corporation; and
For non-employee directors, meet the New York Stock Exchange independence standards then in effect.
29


As discussed further below under the heading “Board Refreshment and Diversity,” in identifying director nominees, the NCG Committee also seeks talented people with diverse backgrounds who can work together to lead the Company to long-term success.

27

Board Evaluations. The NCG Committee oversees the annual evaluation of the Board, which, depending on the focus of the evaluation in a particular year, can include a formal evaluation of the whole Board, its various committees, and/or individual directors. The evaluation is typically conducted as a self-assessment, with an opportunity to also provide feedback on Board performance and diversity, committee effectiveness, and individual director performance, and to raise any concerns that an individual director may have. In addition, the Board evaluation also incorporates peer feedback to individual directors, typically in alternating years. Recent Board evaluations have focused on the Board’s effectiveness in relation to topics such as Board composition and skills; Board meetings and materials; strategic direction and implementation, including Company culture; shareholder communications; Board skills and composition, including diversity; and Board and executive management leadership succession and evaluation processes; risk management; and regulatory and other compliance.processes. Based upon the assessment results, the Board agrees on improvement goals for the coming year and tracks its progress against those goals over the course of the year. The Board also may engage and pay fees to a third-party consultant to assist in performing the Board evaluation and also in identifying and evaluating potential director nominees. Generally, a third-party consultant assists with the Board evaluation at leastapproximately once every three years. The NCG Committee strives to embed honest feedback into the Board’s culture and to set a tone of open and transparent dialogue throughout the assessment process.

In addition, evaluation results are integrated into the Board succession planning processes described under the heading “Board Refreshment and Diversity” below. As an example, if the evaluation process were to suggest that the Board is underrepresented with respect to a particular background, skill, experience, or diverse characteristic, then selection of a nominee to fill a future vacancy would be informed by that suggestion. The Board’s Skills and Experience Matrix is one of the key tools used in this process, and the Board, with the assistance of the NCG Committee, continues to refine and update its Skills and Experience Matrix on a regular basis.

Board Refreshment and Diversity. The Board from time to time has added new, and replaced retiring, directors, consistently valuing diversity as well as skills and experience that align with the Company’s strategic priorities in selecting candidates. In identifying director nominees, the NCG Committee seeks talented people with diverse backgrounds who can work together to lead the Company to long-term success and recommends such candidates to the Board for election. In 2021, the Board added two new independent directors: Dennis Pullin, President and Chief Executive Officer of Virtua Health, who joined the NCG and Compensation Committees, and Inderpreet Sawhney, Group General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer of Infosys Ltd., who joined the NCG and Audit Committees. In addition, in connection with the CEO transition, upon Joe A. Raver’s retirement, Kimberly K. Ryan, the Corporation’s new President and CEO, was appointed to the Board. The Board believes that all three of these new directors’ backgrounds complement our Board’s skill set, expertise, and diversity in support of Hillenbrand’s strategy.

The Board believes that diversity is good for business. The Board has adopted a diversity policy as part of the Company’s Corporate Governance Standards, which provides that directors will be diverse in terms of gender and of race and ethnicity, and in terms of other characteristics, including background, perspective, knowledge, skills, and experience. The Board will take steps necessary to implement this policy and to help ensure an inclusive environment within the Board and at the
30


Company. The current diversity and independence profile of our Board appears below, and we are committed to continued progress in Board diversity as part of ongoing recruitment and refreshment:

28refreshment.

Diversity
Black.jpg
Black.jpg
Black.jpg
Black.jpg
Black.jpg
white.jpg
white.jpg
white.jpg
white.jpg
white.jpg
5 of 10 directors are female
Black.jpg
Black.jpg
Black.jpg
white.jpg
white.jpg
white.jpg
white.jpg
white.jpg
white.jpg
white.jpg
3 of 10 directors are ethnically diverse (two Black or African-American, one Asian)
Independence
Black.jpg
Black.jpg
Black.jpg
Black.jpg
Black.jpg
Black.jpg
Black.jpg
Black.jpg
Black.jpg
white.jpg
9 of 10 directors are independent

Diversity

(GRAPHIC) 

5 of 11 directors are female

(GRAPHIC) 

3 of 11 directors are ethnically diverse (two Black or African-American, one Asian)

Independence

(GRAPHIC) 

10 of 11 directors are independent

In order to encourage refreshment, the Board has implemented a retirement policy requiring that each director must retire at, or no later than, the first Annual Meeting of shareholders following his or her seventy-third birthday. This retirement policy has no exemptions or conditions. As a result, Company directors vary in age and tenure, with an average age of 61,62, with ages ranging from 4850 to 72,69, and average tenure of 58 years, with tenure ranging from less than one2 to 1315 years. The Board believes that the varying tenures of its members providesprovide a constructive blend of institutional knowledge and fresh external viewpoints.

The Board will continue to focus on refreshment by reviewing, among other things, its composition against the Skills and Experience Matrix described above; the diversity, age, and tenure of Company directors; the results of annual evaluations described above; and overall Board and Committee succession planning. These items remain key aspects of the Board’s refreshment strategy, and the Board will continue to look for ways to improve. Additional details on the Board’s refreshment strategy are contained in the NCG Committee Charter and our Corporate Governance Standards, both of which are available on the Company’s web site at www.hillenbrand.com.

Director Education. We maintain an orientation and continuing education process for directors that we view as a vital component of the Company’s policy requiring the Board as a whole to participate in significant decisions. This process includes furnishing of educational and industry-specific materials, meetings with key management, and attendance at Company and industry events. The Board attempts to hold at least one meeting per year at a Company facility outside of its headquarters in Batesville, Indiana; in 2021,2023, the Board observed this practice by arranging for meetings at onecertain of the Company’s primary CanadianAdvanced Process Solutions facilities andin Kansas City, Missouri, involving presentations from local management and their teams. These meetings, like all other Board and Committee meetings during the fiscal year, were held virtually in light of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. The directors’ education includes, among other things, regular dedicated sessions regarding the Company’s businesses and operations, Audit Committee-sponsored financial literacy and legal and regulatory compliance training and engagement on financial literacy, and regular management and corporate governance presentations at NCG and Compensation Committee meetings. Throughout their terms, directors are expected to continue to deepen their
31


experience in the industries and markets served by the Company and to remain generally apprised of trends and developments in corporate governance.

29

Purpose. Hillenbrand is a global industrial company operating in over 60 countries with more than 10,000 employees serving a wide variety of industries around the world. Our Purpose, Shape What Matters for Tomorrow™, reflects our unique position as industry leaders, creating innovative solutions and end products that impact how people live, work, play, travel, eat, and heal. Guided by our Purpose, we pursue excellence, collaboration, and innovation to consistently shape solutions that best serve our customers, employees, communities, and other stakeholders.We firmly believe that understanding our Purpose allows us to connect what we manufacture to a broader societal impact and enhances our ability to achieve what we stand for.

Sustainability and ESG. At Hillenbrand, we strive to provide superior return for our shareholders, exceptional value for our customers, great professional opportunities for our employees,Environmental, Social, and to be responsible to our communities through deployment of the Hillenbrand Operating ModelGovernance (“HOM”ESG”). With the support and oversight of our Board of Directors, we are committed to being a company where the positive impacts of our people, products, and partnerships help better the environments in which we operate. Our employees are encouragedIn this way, our sustainability and ESG efforts align well with our Purpose to volunteer their time and talentsShape What Matters For Tomorrow.
The Company has a dedicated sustainability department overseen by its Chief Sustainability Officer, a role established in multiple service and impact programs that we sponsor throughout2021. Supported by our sustainability department, the Company includingdeploys the Hillenbrand Operating Model (“HOM”), a consistent and repeatable framework of tools and key management practices, to help embed sustainability in the way we do business. We believe that strategic investment in sustainability will enhance our annual global community engagement initiative that we callability to engage, innovate, inspire, and drive quality experiences and success for the One Campaign.

Company through our people, products, and partnerships.

In addition, we require compliance with all applicable environmental, human rights, supply chain, and similar laws and regulations,regulations. We believe that everyone must do their part to maintain our high standards for ethics and ourintegrity. Our Code of Ethical Business Conduct (our “Code”) sets the expectation that our employees will make prompt and full disclosure regarding any concerns they have about a potential ethics or compliance-related issue. Our Code also encourages our employees to be proactive and look for ways we can reduce waste and use energy and natural resources more efficiently. We believe that strategic investmentFurther, we have used the HOM to augment our sustainability practices – for example, to better understand our energy use and emissions profile in our communities will enhance our ability to engage, innovate, inspire, and drive quality experiences and success for our communities, employees, and the Company.

operating companies.

Board Role. The NCG Committee oversees the Company’s objectives, progress, practices, and strategy relating to sustainability and environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) topics.ESG topics, including climate change. The leaders responsible for these efforts make regular presentations to the NCG Committee regarding the Company’s execution on strategy in these areas. In 2021,2023, the NCG Committee met four times, withaddressed sustainability topics addressed in each of these meetings.

its regular meetings, and during the year the NCG Committee added human rights oversight to its Charter. The full Board of Directors also addressed sustainability topics during its annual strategy meeting.

Sustainability Reporting. In 2019, the Company signed on as a participant to the United Nations Global Compact (“UNGC”), a voluntary pledge to develop and exercise corporate responsibility programs and to increase disclosure of the Company’s sustainable business practices. The UNGC requirements include annual publication of a Communication on Progress documenting steps taken to advance the principles of the UNGC in the areas of Human Rights, Labor, Environment, and Anti-Corruption. In fiscal 2021,2023, we published our secondfourth annual sustainability report as part of our commitment to the UNGC.report. This sustainability report included, information aligning withfor the first time, disclosures covering Scope 3 emissions data, water use, renewable energy use for our largest manufacturing sites, Purpose survey data, training hours, and the results of a double-materiality assessment highlighting ten key areas of focus as identified by our stakeholders. The report also included continued alignment to the
32


Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (“SASB”) standards, United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (“SDGs”), and core elements of the GRI Standards from the Global Reporting Initiative. Initiative (“GRI”) standards.
We continue to believe that the Company’s participation in the UNGCannual sustainability report is the appropriate frameworkformat for understandingdisclosing the Company’s commitment to and efforts in advancing its sustainability strategy and ESG efforts as we evaluate additional frameworks for disclosure.strategy. The Company continues to exploreconsider long-term goals that align with science-based targets, and to assess appropriate key performance indicators and to consider long-term goals that can makeadditional appropriate frameworks such as those promulgated by the most of the Company’s sustainability opportunities.Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (“TCFD”). Additional details about our sustainability efforts, including various sustainability-related policies and a copy of our latest sustainability report, are available at our web site at www.hillenbrand.com/sustainability.

In addition to our sustainability report, we also have Global Environmental and Human Rights Policies and Supply Chain Standards that are available at www.hillenbrand.com/sustainability.

30

Determinations with respect to Independence of Directors

The Corporate Governance Standards adopted by the Board of Directors, in accordance with New York Stock Exchange listing standards, require the Board to make an annual determination regarding the independence of each of the Company’s directors and provide criteria for making those determinations. The Board made those determinations for each director in December 20212023 based on an annual evaluation performed by, and recommendations made by, the NCG Committee.

To assist in the Board’s determinations, each director completed materials designed to identify any relationships that could affect the director’s independence under the applicable New York Stock Exchange and SEC rules and under the criteria set forth in the Corporate Governance Standards. This year, in making determinations regarding director independence, the NCG Committee evaluated, and the Board considered, certain transactions between the Company and the employers of twocompanies affiliated with three of its directors: Cummins, Inc. (“Cummins”), a leading industrial company at which Jennifer W. Rumsey is an executive officer, andofficer; Infosys Ltd. (“Infosys”), a global leader in next-generation digital services at which Inderpreet Sawhney is an executive officer.

officer; and W.W. Grainger, Inc., an industrial supply company at which Neil S. Novich is a member of the Board of Directors and its Audit Committee.

In regard to Cummins, the applicable transactions took place between the Company’s Mold-Masters and Milacron Injection Molding and Extrusion business,businesses, which are part of the Company’s Molding Technology Solutions reportable operating segment (“MTS”), and various business units of Cummins. In these transactions during fiscal 2021,2023, Cummins purchased capital equipment and aftermarket parts and service from MTS in the total amount of approximately $975,000.$450,000. In regard to Infosys, the applicable transactions took place between Infosys, the Company, and various of their respective subsidiaries in support of a variety of information technology and other technical matters. In these transactions during fiscal 2021,2023, the Company purchased business process outsourcing services, tech support, and other IT and technical services from Infosys in the total amount of approximately $4,610,000.$6,360,000. None of the current services provided by Infosys to the Company constitutes consulting services nor does any relate to legal, financial, or accounting matters.

In regard to Grainger, the applicable transactions took place between Grainger and various of the Company’s subsidiaries. In these transactions during fiscal 2023, the Company and its subsidiaries purchased equipment and services from Grainger in the total amount of approximately $244,000.

The NCG Committee recommended, and the Board ultimately determined, that Ms. Rumsey, and Ms. Sawhney, and Mr. Novich respectively, did not have a material interest in the applicable transactions and, therefore, notwithstanding these transactions, neither director hadthe directors did not have any material
33


relationship with the Company that would preclude hertheir ability to be independent, and, therefore, that each is independent under the applicable New York Stock Exchange and SEC rules and under the criteria set forth in the Corporate Governance Standards.

In reaching these determinations with regard to Ms. Rumsey, the following factors were considered, among others:


the customer relationship with Cummins had already been in place with the MTS businesses for years prior to Ms. Rumsey’s election to the Board;


Ms. Rumsey’s employment at a customer of the Company was not a consideration in her election as a director;


Ms. Rumsey’s compensation at Cummins is not directly impacted by the Company having made these purchases from the MTS businesses; and

31

the customer relationship with Cummins had already been in place with the MTS businesses for years prior to Ms. Rumsey’s election to the Board;
Ms. Rumsey’s employment at a customer of the Company was not a consideration in her election as a director, and she is not involved in vendor selection for Cummins;


the amounts involved in these transactions, particularly in comparison to the fiscal 2021 net revenue of the Company and Cummins, are immaterial.

Ms. Rumsey’s compensation at Cummins is not directly impacted by the Company having made these purchases from the MTS businesses; and
the amounts involved in these transactions, particularly in comparison to the fiscal 2023 net revenue of the Company and Cummins, are not material, and have decreased relative to prior years.
In reaching these determinations with regard to Ms. Sawhney, the following factors were considered, among others:


the vendor relationship with Infosys had already been in place with the Company for more than two years prior to Ms. Sawhney’s election to the Board;


Ms. Sawhney is not specifically involved in sales, marketing, or other customer acquisition efforts of Infosys and does not have any part of the sales or service delivery organizations reporting to her;


The services provided by Infosys for the Company are not consulting services and are supplied by a variety of employees and service providers who are supervised generally in their work by the Company’s employees;


Ms. Sawhney’s employment at a supplier of the Company was not a consideration in her election as a director;


Ms. Sawhney’s compensation at Infosys is not directly impacted by the purchases by the Company; and


the amounts involved in these transactions, particularly in comparison to the fiscal 2021 net revenue of the Company and Infosys, are immaterial.

the vendor relationship with Infosys had already been in place with the Company for more than two years prior to Ms. Sawhney’s election to the Board;
Ms. Sawhney is not specifically involved in sales, marketing, or other customer acquisition efforts of Infosys and does not have any part of the sales or service delivery organizations reporting to her;
The services provided by Infosys for the Company are not consulting services and are supplied by a variety of employees and service providers who are supervised generally in their work by the Company’s employees;
Ms. Sawhney’s employment at a supplier of the Company was not a consideration in her election as a director;
Ms. Sawhney’s compensation at Infosys is not directly impacted by the purchases by the Company; and
the amounts involved in these transactions, particularly in comparison to the fiscal 2023 net revenue of the Company and Infosys, are not material.
In reaching these determinations with regard to Mr. Novich, the following factors were considered, among others:
Mr. Novich is a member of the Board and not an employee of Grainger and does not have a material interest in the transactions;
Mr. Novich’s role and compensation with Grainger is not directly impacted by the Company having made these purchases from Grainger; and
34


the amounts involved in these transactions, particularly in comparison to the fiscal 2023 net revenue of the Company and Grainger, are not material.

On the basis of these considerations and the materials and the standards described above, the Board determined that each of Gary L. Collar, Helen W. Cornell, Joy M. Greenway, Daniel C. Hillenbrand, F. Joseph Loughrey, Neil S. Novich, Dennis W. Pullin, Jennifer W. Rumsey, Inderpreet Sawhney, and Stuart A. Taylor, II is independent, including for all purposes with respect to their Committee memberships. The Board determined that Kimberly K. Ryan does not meet the director independence standards because of her current service as President and CEO of the Company. Accordingly, Ms. Ryan does not serve on the Audit, Compensation, or NCG Committees of the Board of Directors.

32

Committees of the Board of Directors

It is the general policy of the Company that significant decisions be considered by the Board as a whole. As a consequence, the standing committee structure of the Board is limited to those committees considered to be basic to, or required for, the operation of a publicly held company. Currently those committees are the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, NCG Committee, and Mergers and Acquisitions Committee, each of which has a written charterCharter adopted by the Board of Directors. The NCG Committee recommends the members and chairpersons of those committees to the Board. The Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, and NCG Committee areEach of these Committees is made up only of independent directors. Membership on these committees as of December 30, 2021,January 9, 2024, is shown in the following chart:

AuditCompensation and Management DevelopmentMergers and AcquisitionsNominating/Corporate Governance
AuditCompensation and
Management
Development
Mergers and
Acquisitions
Nominating/Corporate
Governance

Joy M. Greenway

Daniel C. Hillenbrand

Neil S. Novich ♦

Inderpreet Sawhney


♦  Committee Chairperson

Gary L. Collar

Helen W. Cornell

F. Joseph Loughrey

Dennis W. Pullin

Jennifer W. Rumsey

Stuart A. Taylor, II

Helen W. Cornell

Neil S. Novich

Inderpreet Sawhney

Stuart A. Taylor, II ♦

Gary L. Collar

Helen W. Cornell

Joy M. Greenway

Daniel C. Hillenbrand

F. Joseph Loughrey ♦

Neil S. Novich

Dennis W. Pullin

Jennifer W. Rumsey

Inderpreet Sawhney

Stuart A. Taylor, II

The current charterCharter for each of the Board’s standing committees is available on the Company’s web site at www.hillenbrand.com and is available in print to any shareholder who requests it through the Company’s Investor Relations Department.

Audit Committee. The Audit Committee has general oversight responsibilities with respect to the Company’s financial reporting and financial controls, as well asincluding all financial- and cyber-related risks facing the Company, the ethics and compliance function, and information technology and cybersecurity matters.matters, including the extent to which internal and external auditors review IT systems, applications, and security. The Audit Committee annually reviews the Company’s financial reporting process, its system of internal controls regarding accounting, legal, and regulatory compliance that management or the Board has established, the organizational structure of the Company’s ethics and compliance function, information technology and cybersecurity practices, and the internal and external audit processes of the Company. Each current member of the Audit Committee is independent under SEC Rule 10A-3 and New York Stock Exchange listing standards.

35


Each member of the Audit Committee meets the financial literacy guidelines established by the Board in the Audit Committee Charter. The Board interprets “financial literacy” to mean the ability to read and understand audited and unaudited consolidated financial statements (including the related notes) and monthly operating statements of the sort released or prepared by the Company, as the case may be, in the normal course of its business. In addition, the Board of Directors has determined that Messrs. Novich and Hillenbrand and Ms. Greenway are each an “audit committee financial expert” as that term is defined in Item 407(d) of SEC Regulation S-K.

Compensation and Management Development Committee. The Compensation Committee assists the Board in ensuring that the officers and key management of the Company are effectively compensated in terms of salaries, incentive compensation, and other benefits that are internally equitable and externally competitive. As described in more detail in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section, the Compensation Committee is guided by its compensation philosophy – that executives should be fairly compensated for creating appropriate long-term returns for shareholders. As noted above, the Compensation Committee also analyzes and determines the risks, if any, created by our compensation policies and practices. In addition, the Compensation Committee is responsible for reviewing and assessing the talent development and succession strategies concerning the non-CEO officers and key employees of the Company. Each current member of the Compensation Committee is independent as defined by New York Stock Exchange listing standards and SEC rules.

33

Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee. The Charter for the NCG Committee provides that the primary functions of this Committee are to assist the Board of Directors in (i) ensuring that the Company is operated in accordance with prudent and practical corporate governance standards; (ii) ensuring that the Board consists of an appropriate number of independent directors, sufficient to satisfy the threshold requirements established by the Company’s Corporate Governance Standards, New York Stock Exchange listing standards, and other regulations; and (iii) identifying potential candidates for the Board. Each current member of the NCG Committee is independent as defined by New York Stock Exchange listing standards and SEC rules. The NCG Committee’s functions relating to CEO succession planning and director nominations and compensation are described in more detail below. Many of the NCG Committee’s other responsibilities and activities are described above under the headings “Sustainability and ESG – Board Role,” “Board Composition,” and “Determinations with respect to Independence of Directors.”

CEO Succession Planning. The Board considers CEO succession planning to be at the core of its ability to reach sound decisions that drive shareholder value. Consequently, the NCG Committee, on which all of our independent directors serve, is responsible for ensuring there is an effective succession plan for the Company’s CEO. Our succession plan addresses both a short-term or unexpected loss of our CEO, as well as long-term succession. The recent appointment of Kimberly K. Ryan as Chief Executive Officer in 2021 was the culmination of a multi-year leadership development and succession planning process. The NCG Committee led this process with the help of an independent external management consultant and the Board elected Ms. Ryan as Executive Vice President of Hillenbrand in June 2021. In this role, Ms. Ryan had responsibility for the Company’s businesses, including Mold-Masters, Milacron Injection Molding & Extrusion, Coperion, and Batesville, with their leaders and then other executives reporting directlycontinues to her during her transition to therefine its CEO role, which she assumed on December 30, 2021. Given this recent development, the NCG Committee is updating its long-term succession plan, as well as applicable short-term plans.

planning process.

Director Nominations. The NCG Committee’s policy is to consider director candidates recommended by shareholders. Any such recommendations should be communicated to the Chairperson of the NCG Committee in the manner described below under the heading “How You Can Communicate with Directors” and should be accompanied by the information required under the Company’s By-laws for shareholder nominees.

36


The Company’s By-laws provide that nominations of persons for election to the Board of Directors may be made for any meeting of shareholders at which directors are to be elected by or at the direction of the Board or by any shareholder entitled to vote for the election of directors at the meeting.meeting who complies with the required notice procedures. For nominations to be made by a shareholder, the shareholder must have given timely notice thereof in writing“proper written form” to the Secretary of the Company, and any nominee must satisfy the qualifications established by the Board from time to time as contained in the Company’s By-laws and Corporate Governance Standards or posted on the Company’s web site at www.hillenbrand.com, all of which may also be summarized in the proxy statement for the immediately preceding Annual Meeting of shareholders or posted on the Company’s web site at www.hillenbrand.com.

34shareholders.

To be timely, a shareholder’s notice of nomination must be delivered to or mailed and received by the Secretary at the Company’s principal offices not later thanoffice (i) in the case of the Annual Meeting,an annual meeting, not later than 100 days prior to the anniversary of the date of the immediately preceding Annual Meeting thatannual meeting which was specified in the initial formal notice of such meeting (but(except that, if the date of the forthcoming Annual Meetingannual meeting is more than 30 days after such anniversary date, such written notice will also be timely if received by the Secretary by the later of (a) 100 days prior to the forthcoming meeting date and (b)the close of business 10 days following the date on which the Company first makes public disclosure of the meeting date), and (ii) in the case of a special meeting, by the close of business on the tenth day following the date on which the Company first makes public disclosure of the meeting date ) ; and (ii)date.

To be in “proper written form,” a shareholder’s notice to the case of a special meeting, the close of business on the tenth day following the date on which the Company first makes public disclosure of the meeting date. The notice given by the shareholderSecretary must set forth: (A)forth the certain information, including:
(i)the name, age, principal occupation or employment, and address of the shareholder who intends to make the nomination and of the person or the persons to be nominated; (B) a representation that the shareholder is a holder of record, setting forth the shares so held, and intends to appear in person or by proxy as a holder of record at the meeting to nominate the person or persons specified in the notice; (C) proposed nominee;
(ii)a description of any transaction, agreement, arrangement, or understanding (including without limitation, any derivativeshort position or short positions, profit interests, options, hedging transactions, and borrowedany borrowing or loaned shares)lending of shares of the Company) that has been entered into as of the date of the shareholder’s noticemade by or on behalf of the shareholder orsuch person;
(iii)a description of any of its affiliates or associates, the effect or intent ofderivative positions in which is to mitigate loss to, manage risk or benefit of share price changes for, or increase or decrease the voting power of the shareholder or any of its affiliates or associatessuch person has an interest with respect to common stockCompany securities;
(iv)descriptions of other agreements, such as voting or other related party agreements with the respect to the Company; (D)
(v)a description of all arrangements or understandings betweenwritten representation and agreement by the nominee covering various topics, including independence; and
(vi)as to such shareholder, and each nominee proposed by the shareholder andbeneficial owner, if any, other person or persons (identifyingon whose behalf such person or persons) pursuant to which the nomination or nominations areis to be made, by the shareholders; (E)name and record address or principal place of business of such otherperson.
In addition to the information regarding each nominee proposed by such shareholder as would be required to be included in a proxy statement filedor requested pursuant to the proxyimmediately preceding paragraph or any other provision of its By-laws, the Company may require any nominee or proposed nominee for election to the Board of Directors to furnish any other information (i) that may reasonably be requested by the Company to determine whether such nominee or proposed nominee would be independent under the rules and listing standards of the securities exchanges upon which shares of the Company are listed or traded, any applicable rules of the SEC; (F)SEC or any publicly disclosed standards used by the consentBoard of Directors in writingdetermining and disclosing the independence of eachthe directors; (ii) that
37


could be material to a reasonable shareholder’s understanding of the independence, or lack thereof, of such nominee or proposed nominee; or (iii) that may reasonably be requested by the Company to determine the eligibility of such nominee or proposed nominee to serve as a director. Shareholders who intend to solicit proxies in support of director nominees other than the Company’s nominees must also comply with the requirements of SEC Rule 14a-19(b). The foregoing description is qualified in all respects by reference to Section 3.11 of the Company if so elected; (G) a description of the qualifications of such nominee to serve as a director of the Company; and (H) an undertaking by the shareholder to notify the Company in writing of any change in the information called for by clauses (B), (C), and (D) as of the record date for such meeting, by notice received by the Secretary not later than the 10th day following such record date, and thereafter by notice so given and received within two business days of any change in such information, and, in any event, as of the close of business of the day preceding the meeting date.

Company’s By-Laws.

Director Compensation. The NCG Committee also oversees director compensation. The NCG Committee assesses the Company’s director compensation package periodically, but no less frequently than once every three years, to ensure that it reflects competitive market conditions and sound corporate governance practices. In addition, the NCG Committee annually considers and approves non-employee director compensation for that fiscal year, and any changes in director compensation must be approved by the Board. The NCG Committee last engaged a compensation consultant to conduct a director compensation study in 2019,2022, resulting in a recommended increasechanges in director compensation. But as part of the Company’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Board voluntarily waived any changes for 2020, including its scheduled cash compensation increase, until 2021. These changes were then implemented andthat are described under the heading “Compensation of Directors” below.

Mergers and Acquisitions Committee. Given the importance of mergers and acquisitions in the Company’s overall strategy, a designated committee of the Board has been formed to focus solely on this area. The Mergers and Acquisitions Committee (the “M&A Committee”) (a)(i) reviews with management and the Board the role of mergers and acquisitions within the Company’s overall growth strategy, (b)(ii) provides advice and counsel to management regarding the Company’s various strategic alternatives, with a primary focus on the composition and growth of the Company’s portfolio of businesses, and (c)(iii) reviews material mergers, acquisitions, dispositions, or other potential transactions, and provides guidance to management as it prepares to present its conclusions and recommendations to the Board as appropriate. While the M&A Committee reviews significant transactions with management, the authority to approve such transactions rests with the Board as a whole.

35

Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions

The Corporate Governance Standards for the Board require that all transactions between the Company or its subsidiaries and any “related person” (as such term is defined in applicable securities regulation) must be reviewed and pre-approved pursuant to the terms of the Company’s Related Person Transaction Policy. The Related Person Transaction Policy requires approval of such transactions by the NCG Committee, in the case of material or disclosable transactions, or by the Chairperson of thatthe NCG Committee, in the case of immaterial and non-disclosable transactions. The Related Person Transaction Policy requires that the NCG Committee or its Chairperson, as applicable, consider all relevant facts and circumstances of the transaction, including the commercial reasonableness of the terms, the benefit and perceived benefit to the Company, the availability of alternative transactions, the materiality and character of the related person’s interest, and the actual or apparent conflict of interest of the related person. If the related person is an independent director (or an immediate family member of an independent director), then the impact on the director’s independence must also be considered.

The NCG Committee reviews potential related person transactions in connection with independence determinations for individual directors.each director. In fiscal 2021,2023, the NCG Committee identified no transactions in which any related person had a material interest that would require disclosure.

38


How You Can Communicate with Directors

Shareholders of the Company and other interested persons may communicate with the Chairperson of the Board, the chairpersons of the Board’s committees, or the non-management directors of the Company as a group, by sending an email to our Investor Relations Department at investors@hillenbrand.com. The email should specify which of the foregoing is the intended recipient so that it can be forwarded accordingly.

Attendance at Meetings

The upcoming Annual Meeting will be the fourteenth Annual Meeting of the Company’s shareholders.

Directors are expected to attend each Annual Meeting.Meeting of shareholders. The Chairperson of the Board generally presides at theeach Annual MeetingsMeeting of shareholders, and the Board holds one of its regular meetings in conjunction with each Annual Meeting. All of the then-serving directors attended the Company’s 20212023 Annual Meeting.

The Board held a total of eight meetings during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2021.2023. During the same fiscal year, the Compensation Committee held eightnine meetings, the NCG Committee held fourfive meetings, the Audit Committee met seven times, and the M&A Committee met fiveten times. Each director attended at least 75 percent of the aggregate number of meetings of the full Board of Directors and the number of meetings of the committees on which he or she served during his or her tenure in fiscal year 2021.

362023.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

The Compensation Committee had no interlocks or insider participation during fiscal 2021.2023. Specifically, during fiscal 2021,2023, directors Collar, Cornell, Loughrey, Pullin, Rumsey, and Taylor served on the Compensation Committee of the Company, and none of them:


Is or has at any time been an officer or employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries; or


Has or has had at any time any direct or indirect material interest in an existing or proposed transaction involving more than $120,000 in which the Company is, was, or was proposed to be a participant, or that is otherwise required to be disclosed by us under the proxy disclosure rules.

Is or has at any time been an officer or employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries; or
Has or has had at any time any direct or indirect material interest in an existing or proposed transaction involving more than $120,000 in which the Company is, was, or was proposed to be a participant, or that is otherwise required to be disclosed by us under the proxy disclosure rules.
Also in that regard, during fiscal 2021,2023, none of our executive officers served as a member of the board of directors or on the compensation committee of any other company that had an executive officer who served on our Board of Directors or our Compensation Committee.

37
39


SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS AND MANAGEMENT

In furtherance of our stated goal of creating shareholder value over the long term, we believe it is important for our directors and executive officers to own stock in the Company. In that regard, each non-employee director is required, within five years after becoming a director, to own and maintain ownership of a minimum number of shares of our common stock equal in value to five times his or her annual cash compensation. In addition, non-employee directors are required to hold any vested shares of stock awarded as part of their annual equity compensation until after the director ceases to serve on the Board,67 a change in control of the Company, or the director’s death or permanent and total disability. Similar ownership requirements for our Named Executive Officers and other executive officers are further described in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this proxy statement. In all cases, such ownership may, for purposes of the holding requirements, include shares of restricted stock and time-based restricted stock units but notneither shares that underlie unexercised stock options, nor beginning in 2021, performance-based restricted stock units.

The table below shows shares beneficially owned by allour directors and executive officers as of December 13, 2021.

15, 2023.

Security Ownership of Directors:

Name
Shares (1)
Beneficially Owned As Of
December 15, 2023
Percent Of
Total Shares
Outstanding
Helen W. Cornell – Chairperson59,247(2)*
Gary L. Collar27,348(3)*
Joy M. Greenway36,012(4)*
Daniel C. Hillenbrand266,918(5)*
Neil S. Novich56,894(6)*
Dennis W. Pullin6,588(7)*
Jennifer W. Rumsey8,971(8)*
Kimberly K. Ryan279,853(9)*
Inderpreet Sawhney6,276(10)*
Stuart A. Taylor, II75,507(11)*








Name

Shares (1)

Beneficially Owned As Of

December 13, 2021

Percent Of

Total Shares

Outstanding

F. Joseph Loughrey – Chairperson103,256 (2)*
Gary L. Collar21,073 (3)*
Helen W. Cornell39,283 (4)*
Joy M. Greenway29,418 (5)*
Daniel C. Hillenbrand258,608 (6)*
Neil S. Novich49,540 (7)*
Dennis W. Pullin1,096 (8)*
Joe A. Raver641,785 (9)*
Jennifer W. Rumsey3,389 (10)*
Inderpreet Sawhney795 (11)*
Stuart A. Taylor, II67,510 (12)*

6 7For awards granted prior to May 2014, directors must hold the underlying shares of common stock of the Company through the end of six months after they cease serving as a director; for awards granted in May 2014 or later, directors must hold the underlying shares of common stock of the Company through one day after the director ceases serving.

38
40



Security Ownership of Named Executive Officers:

Name

Shares (1)

Beneficially Owned As Of

December 13, 2021

Percent Of

Total Shares

Outstanding

Kristina A. Cerniglia215,958 (13)*
Kimberly K. Ryan262,682 (14)*
Christopher H. Trainor145,223 (15)*
J. Michael Whitted161,013 (16)*
All directors and executive officers of the Company as a group, consisting of 24 persons2,229,527 (17)3.08%

Name
Shares (1)
Beneficially Owned As Of
December 15, 2023
Percent Of
Total Shares
Outstanding
Robert M. VanHimbergen23,240(12)*
Ulrich Bartel41,919(13)*
Nicholas R. Farrell103,562(14)*
J. Michael Whitted210,462(15)*
All directors and executive officers of the Company as a group, consisting of 20 persons1,243,287(16)1.8%
*Ownership is less than one percent of the total shares outstanding.
(1)The Company’s only class of equity securities outstanding is common stock without par value. Except as otherwise indicated in these footnotes, the persons named have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares shown as beneficially owned by them. None of the shares beneficially owned by directors or executive officers is pledged as security. Information regarding shares beneficially owned by Ms. Ryan, our President and CEO, is included in the “Security Ownership of Directors” table above.
(2)Includes 13,191 shares held by trusts of which Ms. Cornell is trustee, and 46,056 restricted stock units held on the books and records of the Company.
(3)Includes 27,348 restricted stock units held on the books and records of the Company.
(4)Includes 36,012 restricted stock units held on the books and records of the Company.
(5)Includes (i) 3,448 shares directly owned by Mr. Hillenbrand; (ii) 16,363 restricted stock units held on the books and records of the Company; and (iii) 247,107 shares indirectly beneficially owned by Mr. Hillenbrand, consisting of (a) 135,863 shares owned by Clear Water Capital Partners, LP, (b) 8,631 shares owned by John and Joan GC TR FBO (John, Rose and Olivia), with respect to which Mr. Hillenbrand is a co-trustee, (c) 5,754 shares owned by John and Joan GC TR FBO (Eleanor and Sarah), with respect to which Mr. Hillenbrand is a co-trustee, with respect to which Mr. Hillenbrand disclaims beneficial ownership, (d) 48,611 shares owned by Hillenbrand II TR FBO (John, Rose and Olivia), with respect to which Mr. Hillenbrand is a co-trustee, (e) 28,248 shares owned by John and Joan CRT IMA, with respect to which Mr. Hillenbrand is a co-trustee, and (f) 20,000 shares owned by Anne Hillenbrand Singleton Trust, with respect to which Mr. Hillenbrand disclaims beneficial ownership.
(6)Includes 53,545 restricted stock units held on the books and records of the Company and 3,349 shares acquired with deferred director fees and held on the books and records of the Company under the Board’s deferred compensation plan.
(7)Includes 6,588 restricted stock units held on the books and records of the Company.
41

*Ownership is less than one percent of the total shares outstanding.


(1)The Company’s only class of equity securities outstanding is common stock without par value. Except as otherwise indicated in these footnotes, the persons named have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares shown as beneficially owned by them. None of the shares beneficially owned by directors or executive officers is pledged as security. Information regarding shares beneficially owned by Mr. Raver, our President and CEO at the end of the 2021 fiscal year, is included in the “Security Ownership of Directors” table above.


(2)Includes 30,000 shares directly owned by Mr. Loughrey and 73,256 restricted stock units held on the books and records of the Company.


(3)Includes 21,073 restricted stock units held on the books and records of the Company.


(4)Includes 1,500 shares held by a trust of which Ms. Cornell is trustee, and 37,783 restricted stock units held on the books and records of the Company.


(5)Includes 29,418 restricted stock units held on the books and records of the Company.


(6)Includes (i) 1,000 shares directly owned by Mr. Hillenbrand; (ii) 10,501 restricted stock units held on the books and records of the Company; and (iii) 247,107 shares indirectly beneficially owned by Mr. Hillenbrand, consisting of (a) 135,863 shares owned by Clear Water Capital Partners, LP, (b) 8,631 shares owned by John and Joan GC TR FBO (John, Rose and Olivia), with respect to which Mr. Hillenbrand is a co-trustee, (c) 5,754 shares owned by John and Joan GC TR FBO (Eleanor and Sarah), with respect to which Mr. Hillenbrand is a co-trustee, with respect to which Mr. Hillenbrand disclaims beneficial ownership, (d) 48,611 shares owned by Hillenbrand II TR FBO (John, Rose and Olivia), with respect to which Mr. Hillenbrand is a co-trustee, (e) 28,248 shares owned by John and Joan CRT IMA, with respect to which Mr. Hillenbrand is a co-trustee, and (f) 20,000 shares owned by Anne Hillenbrand Singleton Trust, with respect to which Mr. Hillenbrand disclaims beneficial ownership.


39

(8)Includes 8,971 restricted stock units held on the books and records of the Company.
(9)Includes 128,003 shares directly owned by Ms. Ryan, as well as (a) 136,220 shares that may be purchased pursuant to stock options that are exercisable within 60 days of December 15, 2023, and (b) 15,630 restricted stock units that could vest within 60 days of December 15, 2023. Does not include 51,709 restricted stock units that vest in future years pursuant to terms described under the table “Grants of Plan-Based Awards for Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2023” in Part III under “Executive Compensation.”
(10)Includes 6,276 restricted stock units held on the books and records of the Company.
(11)Includes 63,274 restricted stock units held on the books and records of the Company and 12,233 shares acquired with deferred director fees and held on the books and records of the Company under the Board’s deferred compensation plan.
(12)Includes 23,240 shares directly owned by Mr. VanHimbergen. Does not include 63,908 restricted stock units that vest in future years pursuant to terms described under the table “Grants of Plan-Based Awards for Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2023” in Part III under “Executive Compensation.”

(13)Includes 18,933 shares directly owned by Mr. Bartel, as well as 20,086 shares that may be purchased pursuant to stock options that are exercisable within 60 day of December 15, 2023, and (b) 2,900 restricted stock units that could vest within 60 days of December 15, 2023. Does not include 9,965 restricted stock units that vest in future years pursuant to terms described under the table “Grants of Plan-Based Awards for Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2023” in Part III under “Executive Compensation.”
(14)Includes 41,951 shares directly owned by Mr. Farrell, as well as 61,611 shares that may be purchased pursuant to stock options that are exercisable within 60 days of December 15, 2023. Does not include 40,981 restricted stock units that vest in future years pursuant to terms described under the table “Grants of Plan-Based Awards for Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2023” in Part III under “Executive Compensation.”

(15)Includes 48,522 shares directly owned by Mr. Whitted, as well as 161,940 shares that may be purchased pursuant to stock options that are exercisable within 60 days of December 15, 2023. Does not include 29,446 restricted stock units that vest in future years pursuant to terms described under the table “Grants of Plan-Based Awards for Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2023” in Part III under “Executive Compensation.”
(16)Includes 289,255 shares directly owned by the applicable director or executive officer, 395,189 shares that may be purchased pursuant to stock options that are exercisable within 60 days of December 15, 2023, 282,963 restricted stock units held on the books and records of the Company (including any restricted stock units that could vest within 60 days of December 15, 2023), 98,681 shares held by trusts, 135,863 shares owned by limited partnerships, 25,754 shares with respect to which the director disclaims beneficial ownership, and 15,582 shares acquired with deferred director fees and held on the books and records of the Company under the Board’s deferred compensation plan. Does not include 245,222 restricted stock units awarded to executive officers that vest in future years pursuant to their terms including, if
42


(7)Includes 46,291 restricted stock units held on the books and records of the Company and 3,249 shares acquired with deferred director fees and held on the books and records of the Company under the Board’s deferred compensation plan.


(8)Includes 1,096 restricted stock units held on the books and records of the Company.


(9)Includes 212,606 shares directly owned by Mr. Raver, as well as 420,716 shares that may be purchased pursuant to stock options that are exercisable within 60 days of December 13, 2021, considering his retirement on December 30, 2021, and 8,463 restricted stock units that vest upon his retirement on December 30, 2021. Does not include 15,176 restricted stock units that would otherwise vest in future years pursuant to terms described under the table “Grants of Plan-Based Awards for Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2021” in Part III under “Executive Compensation.”


(10)Includes 3,389 restricted stock units held on the books and records of the Company.


(11)Includes 795 restricted stock units held on the books and records of the Company.


(12)Includes 55,652 restricted stock units held on the books and records of the Company and 11,858 shares acquired with deferred director fees and held on the books and records of the Company under the Board’s deferred compensation plan.


(13)Includes 62,105 shares directly owned by Ms. Cerniglia, as well as (a) 150,848 shares that may be purchased pursuant to stock options that are exercisable within, and (b) 3,005 restricted stock units that could vest within, 60 days of December 13, 2021. Does not include 45,275 restricted stock units that vest in future years pursuant to terms described under the table “Grants of Plan-Based Awards for Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2021” in Part III under “Executive Compensation.”


(14)Includes 82,193 shares directly owned by Ms. Ryan, as well as (a) 176,850 shares that may be purchased pursuant to stock options that are exercisable within, and (b) 3,639 restricted stock units that could vest within, 60 days of December 13, 2021. Does not include 23,630 restricted stock units that vest in future years pursuant to terms described under the table “Grants of Plan-Based Awards for Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2021” in Part III under “Executive Compensation.”


(15)Includes 46,237 shares directly owned by Mr. Trainor, as well as 98,986 shares that may be purchased pursuant to stock options that are exercisable within 60 days of December 13, 2021. Does not include 70,498 restricted stock units that vest in future years pursuant to terms described under the table “Grants of Plan-Based Awards for Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2021” in Part III under “Executive Compensation.”


(16)Includes 10,802 shares directly owned by Mr. Whitted, as well as 150,211 shares that may be purchased pursuant to stock options that are exercisable within 60 days of December 13, 2021. Does not include 60,303 restricted stock units that vest in future years pursuant to terms described under the table “Grants of Plan-Based Awards for Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2021” in Part III under “Executive Compensation.”


40

applicable, as described under the table “Grants of Plan-Based Awards for Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2023” in Part III under “Executive Compensation.”
43


(17)Includes 505,069 shares directly owned by the applicable director or executive officer, 1,147,542 shares that may be purchased pursuant to stock options that are exercisable within 60 days of December 13, 2021, 313,292 restricted stock units held on the books and records of the Company (including any restricted stock units that could vest within 60 days of December 13, 2021), 86,990 shares held by trusts, 135,863 shares owned by limited partnerships, 25,754 shares with respect to which the director disclaims beneficial ownership, and 15,107 shares acquired with deferred director fees and held on the books and records of the Company under the Board’s deferred compensation plan. Does not include 278,763 restricted stock units awarded to executive officers that vest in future years pursuant to their terms including, if applicable, as described under the table “Grants of Plan-Based Awards for Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2021” in Part III under “Executive Compensation.”


41

DELINQUENT SECTION 16(a) REPORTS

Under Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Section 16(a)”), the Company’s directors, certain of its officers, and any person holding more than 10 percent of the Company’s common stock are required to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of common stock of the Company. The Company is required to report in this proxy statement any failure to file on a timely basis any reports required by Section 16(a) during the fiscal year ended September 30, 20212023 or prior fiscal years. Based solely on a review of filings made electronically with the SEC, the Company believes that these filing requirements were satisfied by its directors, officers, and 10 percent beneficial owners, except that, as a result of administrative errors, Ling An-Heid, Senior Vice President and President of the Company’s Mold-Masters business, filed one late report in fiscal 2021 with respect to the sale of 21,248 shares.

42
44


SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF BENEFICIAL OWNERS OF MORE THAN 5 PERCENT OF THE COMPANY’S COMMON STOCK

The following table provides information regarding all persons or entities known to us that, as of the date indicated, were beneficial owners of more than 5 percent of the Company’s common stock.

Name

Shares

Beneficially Owned As Of

December 13, 2021

Percent Of

Total Shares

Outstanding

BlackRock Inc.

55 East 52nd Street

New York, NY 10055

11,887,568 (1)16.40%

The Vanguard Group

P.O. Box 2600, V26

Valley Forge, PA 19482

7,605,607 (2)10.49%

Clarkston Capital Partners, LLC

91 West Long Lake Road

Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304

5,703,462 (3)7.87%

Name
Shares
Beneficially Owned As Of
December 15, 2023
Percent Of
Total Shares
Outstanding
BlackRock Inc.
55 East 52nd Street
New York, NY 10055
11,458,385(1)16.3%
The Vanguard Group
P.O. Box 2600, V26
Valley Forge, PA 19482
7,616,852(2)10.9%
Clarkston Capital Partners, LLC
91 West Long Lake Road
Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304
5,116,720(3)7.3%
(1)This information is based on a Schedule 13G/A filed by BlackRock Inc. with the SEC on January 26, 2023; and reflects sole dispositive power with respect to all shares and sole voting power with respect to 11,337,602 shares, thus indicating no voting power with respect to 120,783 shares.
(2)This information is based on a Schedule 13G/A filed by The Vanguard Group with the SEC on February 9, 2023; reflects sole dispositive power with respect to 7,463,879 shares, and shared dispositive power with respect to 152,973 shares; and reflects shared voting power with respect to 83,411 shares, thus indicating no voting power with respect to 7,533,441 shares.
(3)This information is based on a Schedule 13G/A filed by Clarkston Capital Partners, LLC with the SEC on February 14, 2023. Clarkston Capital Partners, LLC, an investment advisor, reports (i) sole dispositive power and sole voting power with respect to 500 shares and (ii) shared dispositive power with respect to 5,116,220 shares and shared voting power with respect to 5,008,120 shares with Clarkston Companies, Inc., Modell Capital LLC, Jeffrey A. Hakala, Gerald W. Hakala, and Jeremy J. Modell, thus indicating (iii) no voting power with respect to 108,100 shares.
45

(1)This information is based on a Form 13G filed by BlackRock Inc. with the SEC on January 25, 2021; reflects sole dispositive power with respect to all shares and sole voting power with respect to 11,746,746 shares, thus indicating no voting power with respect to 140,822 shares.


(2)This information is based on a Form 13G/A filed by The Vanguard Group with the SEC on March 10, 2021; reflects sole dispositive voting power with respect to 7,469,336 shares, and shared dispositive power with respect to 136,271 shares; and shared voting power with respect to 75,257 shares, thus indicating no voting power with respect to 7,530,350 shares.


(3)This information is based on a Form 13G filed by Clarkston Capital Partners, LLC with the SEC on February 16, 2021. Clarkston Capital Partners, LLC, an investment advisor, reports shared dispositive power and shared voting power with Clarkston Companies, Inc., Modell Capital LLC, Jeffrey A. Hakala, Gerald W. Hakala, and Jeremy J. Modell with respect to all shares.


43

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Introduction

This “Executive Compensation” section encompasses several parts. Part I, our Compensation Discussion and Analysis, provides detailed information about our executive compensation philosophy, policies, actions, decisions (and the bases for such decisions), and procedures as they relate to our executive officers who are included in the compensation disclosures in this proxy statement pursuant to SEC rules – persons who are identified as our Named Executive Officers. This part is organized as follows:


Our Executive Compensation Philosophy and Focus on Performance-Based Compensation

Unique Circumstances in Fiscal Year 2021

Factors Considered in Setting Compensation

Compensation of Our Named Executive Officers for Fiscal 2021

Retirement and Savings Plans

Employment Agreements and Termination Benefits

Other Personal Benefits

Compensation-Related Policies

Our Executive Compensation Philosophy and Focus on Performance-Based Compensation
Factors Considered in Setting Compensation
Compensation of Our Named Executive Officers for Fiscal 2023
Retirement and Savings Plans
Employment Agreements and Termination Benefits
Other Personal Benefits
Compensation-Related Policies
The remaining parts of this “Executive Compensation” section are as follows:


Part II is a report from the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors.

Part III presents numerous tables that report in detail the compensation of, and the potential amounts payable by the Company under certain contractual agreements with, the Named Executive Officers.

Part IV provides information regarding the engagement of Deloitte Consulting, LLP (“Deloitte Consulting”), the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant through June 2021, as well as Pay Governance LLC (“Pay Governance”), the replacement independent compensation consultant for the balance of fiscal 2021.

Part V provides information relating to the compensation-related risk assessment and management strategies employed by the Company.

Part VI discloses our CEO pay ratio information pursuant to Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K.

Part VII describes our anti-hedging and anti-pledging policies.

Part II is a report from the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors.
Part III presents numerous tables that report in detail the compensation of, and the potential amounts payable by the Company under certain contractual agreements with, the Named Executive Officers.
Part IV provides information regarding the engagement of Pay Governance LLC (“Pay Governance”), the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant.
Part V provides information relating to the compensation-related risk assessment and management strategies employed by the Company.
Part VI discloses our CEO pay ratio information pursuant to Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K.
Part VII describes our anti-hedging and anti-pledging policies.
Part VIII covers our pay versus performance disclosure.
We encourage you to keep two basic thoughts in mind as you read the Executive Compensation section of the proxy:


First, the compensation of our Named Executive Officers is set by our Compensation Committee, which is a committee of independent directors.


Second, a significant portion of each Named Executive Officer’s compensation is variable based on the performance of the Company or its applicable business unit(s), as well as individual performance. This structure is designed to align compensation with the interests of the shareholders of the Company.

First, the compensation of our Named Executive Officers is set by our Compensation Committee, which is a committee of independent directors.
Second, a significant portion of each Named Executive Officer’s compensation is variable based on the performance of the Company or its applicable business unit(s), as well as individual performance. This structure is designed to align compensation with the interests of the shareholders of the Company.
44
46


PART I: COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis describes our compensation program and how it operates for our Named Executive Officers. It also discusses the principles underlying our compensation policies and decisions along withand the impactsstrategic developments that our Compensation Committee considered, such as our transformation into a pure-play industrial company, including the divestiture of our historical Batesville business segment, in making these decisions for fiscal 2023.
SEC rules identify our “Named Executive Officers” as those persons who served as (i) our principal executive officer during the second year ofended September 30, 2023, (ii) our principal financial officer during the continuing integration of Milacron Holdings Corp. (“Milacron”),year ended September 30, 2023, and (iii) our other three most highly compensated executive officers for the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, and our CEO transition to executive compensation in fiscal 2021.year ended September 30, 2023.   Our Named Executive Officers for 2021,2023, with titles held at the end of the fiscal year,their principal positions, are:

Joe A. Raver
Kimberly K. RyanPresident and Chief Executive Officer
Kristina A. CernigliaRobert M. VanHimbergenSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Kimberly K. RyanUlrich BartelExecutive Vice President
Christopher H. TrainorSenior Vice President and President, of BatesvilleCoperion and Advanced Process Solutions
Nicholas R. FarrellSenior Vice President, General Counsel, and Secretary
J. Michael WhittedSenior Vice President, Strategy and& Corporate Development

Mr. Raver retired after the end of the fiscal year, on December 30, 2021, at which time Ms. Ryan became President and Chief Executive Officer.

Our Executive Compensation Philosophy and Focus on Performance-Based Compensation

We believe that Hillenbrand’s executives should be fairly compensated for creating appropriate long-term returns for shareholders. Our Compensation Committee has adopted the following Executive Compensation Philosophy, which describes the principles of our executive compensation program.

47


The executive compensation program is designed to effectively compensate officers and key management personnel with base salary and appropriately balanced short-term and long-term incentive compensation, and other benefits that attract, motivate, and retain superior leadership talent while advancing the long-term interests of Hillenbrand’s shareholders.

The compensation program is based on the following principles:

●      Reinforcing

Maintaining high standards of governance and reinforcing the absolute requirement for ethical behavior consistent with the Company’s values in all practices;

●      

Structuring short-termincentive targets that lead to long-term growth and value creation for shareholders;

●      

Motivating management to achieve superior results by linking compensation and performance (actualperformance;
Differentiating compensation will vary above or below targeted values depending on company and individual performance);

●      Implementing payout differentiation among executives based on both business unit and individual performance during the year;

●      

Offering and maintaining compensation programs which are competitive against relevant industry peer group median and market practice benchmarks obtained through proxy materials andas well as published survey information, with actual positioning for individual executives varying based on factors such as sustained performance, experience, and that serve as the framework to inform the competitive landscape;

●      strategic impact;

Having a significantan appropriate portion of at-risk compensation based on market practice, that, in combination with appropriate stock ownership requirements for our top executives, focuses the attention of our executives on driving and increasing shareholder value;

●      Maintaining high standards

In the case of governanceunforeseen events, allowing the Compensation Committee to exercise its discretion in the administration of the compensation program to motivate executives to act in the best interest of shareholders and discouragingthe Company;
Discouraging unnecessary and excessive risk taking that may have a material adverse impact on the Company or that lead to behaviors inconsistent with the Company’s values;Company; and

●      

Reflecting the Company’s commitment to initiatives in environmental, social, and governance initiatives, includingand diversity, equity and inclusion.

inclusion areas, as well as internal pay equity.

45


Compensation Program Features and Best Practices. Our compensation philosophy and the principles described above serve as the foundation for our executive compensation program. Building on this foundation, our Compensation Committee and the full Board continually seek improvement and alignment with best practices – both in our compensation program itself and in our corporate governance practices that support it – by soliciting feedback from shareholders and consultingadvice from the Company’s independent compensation consultant and other advisors. The result is a compensation program characterized by certain distinct features highlighted below that strengthen the performance orientation of our executive compensation program and reflect our ongoing commitment to align executive pay with long-term shareholder value.

48


Our Focus on Performance-Based Compensation. The central theme of the compensation philosophy of Hillenbrand and our Compensation Committee is that a significant portion of each Named Executive Officer’s compensation will be “performance-based” and, therefore, at risk. This theme is highlighted in the table below. We use a thorough process for determining Named Executive Officer compensation, including a review of peer group compensation data and pay practices.

Key Components Of 2021of 2023 Compensation ProgramDescription Andand Purpose

“Core Compensation”
Base SalaryFixed compensation intended to provide a base level of income regardless of performance and aid in the attraction and retention of talent in a competitive market.
Short-Term Incentive Compensation (“STIC”)Performance-based annual cash bonus designed to motivate and reward executives based on achieving individual performance goals and the executive’s individual contributions to the Company’sCompany (Hillenbrand or its business units, where applicable) collective performance goals for a given fiscal year. Also aids in the attraction and retention of talent in a competitive market.

46

Key Components Of 2021 Compensation ProgramDescription And Purpose
Long-Term Incentive Compensation (“LTIC”)

Two-thirds consist of performance-based annual equity awards with a three-year vesting period and one-third consists of restricted stock units that vest ratably over three years, and share some of the same characteristics of performance-based awards, together designed to reward executives for creating long-term shareholder value, as well as to motivate future contributions and decisions aimed at increasing shareholder value. Also aids in the attraction and retention of talent in a competitive market.

The Compensation Committee considers time-based restricted stock units to be “at risk,” even though not performance based, since the value fluctuates based on stock price performance and vesting of the full award is contingent upon continued service.

Retirement and Other BenefitsFixed component of compensation intended to protect against catastrophic expenses (healthcare, disability, and life insurance) and provide opportunity to save for retirement (401(k)).
Post-Termination Compensation (Severance and Change in Control)Severance program designed to allow executives to focus on acting in the best interests of shareholders regardless of the impact on their own employment.

Target Core Compensation Mix. The Company’s approach to core compensation described above has generally produced a core compensation mix of approximately 2015 percent base salary, 20 percent STIC, and 6065 percent LTIC for our President and CEO. As shown in the chart below, in fiscal 2021,2023, approximately 85 percent of theMs. Ryan’s target core compensation of the Company’s President and CEO for the year was considered at risk78 by our Compensation Committee, while 15 percent was fixed. In addition,Furthermore, the majority of the CEO’sMs. Ryan’s compensation was explicitly performance-based. Given the role of the CEO in ultimately driving results throughout the organization, the Compensation Committee believes the resulting emphasis on performance-based, at-risk compensation – and in particular, long-term incentives – is appropriate and in the best interests of shareholders. The Company has generally maintained this approach with our new President and CEO.


7 8This includes time-based restricted stock units, which the Compensation Committee considers to be “at risk” since the value fluctuates based on stock price performance and vesting of all tranches is contingent upon continued service.

47
49



driving results throughout the organization, the Compensation Committee believes the resulting emphasis on performance-based, at-risk compensation – and in particular, long-term incentives – is appropriate and in the best interests of shareholders. Ms. Ryan’s target core compensation mix is shown in further detail in the chart below.

 

image (17).jpg

The approach used for compensation of our other Named Executive Officers is similar to that of our President and CEO, although the other executives generally have a higher percentage of base salary, and a correspondingly lower percentage of STIC and LTIC.

Unique Circumstances in Fiscal 2021

Against the backdrop of the Company’s compensation philosophy and focus on performance-based compensation, fiscal 2021 brought unique circumstances that provided additional context for many of the Compensation Committee’s decisions. Throughout the year, the second year of the continuing Milacron integration and impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the Company’s results remained near the forefront of discussions about executive compensation, along with our CEO transition.

The Milacron Integration. The acquisition of Milacron, completed in fiscal 2020, provides the Company with increased scale and meaningful product diversification, enhancing its ability to serve customers with expanded capabilities across the plastics value chain. The Company has since been engaged in a comprehensive integration project, which proceeded largely as planned during its second year, including the achievement of approximately $30 million in incremental synergies, despite limitations on some integration activities due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic. The challenges brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 continued into fiscal 2021. Most states and municipalities within the U.S. that enacted temporary closures of businesses began to roll those back during 2021, but quarantine orders and other restrictive measures taken in response to the COVID-19 pandemic continued to have an impact from time to time in various locations. We also experienced disruptions from similar measures taken by other countries, and we continued taking proactive measures based on local impacts of the pandemic, including in China and India. These disruptions were at times severe and impactful, but in light of the signs of improvement in the market and public health environment generally, management recommended, and the Compensation Committee agreed, to end the compensation-related actions taken as part of the Company’s broader strategy in response to the COVID-19 pandemic during 2020. Those actions included a voluntary salary reduction for our CEO and voluntary waiver of a scheduled Board cash compensation increase, as well as suspension of merit-based salary increases for our salaried U.S. and Canada-based employees.

48


The Company achieved record levels for order intake, revenue, and cash flow in fiscal 2021, despite a challenging macroeconomic environment due to cost inflation and pandemic-related disruptions across the supply chain. The Advanced Process Solutions and Molding Technology Solutions reportable operating segments saw a solid recovery in demand across all core end markets, resulting in a strong backlog heading into fiscal 2022. Batesville delivered strong top- and bottom-line results, primarily driven by higher burial casket sales resulting from an estimated increase in deaths associated with the COVID-19 pandemic. On the relative strength of this performance, the Company expects to continue cautiously resuming many pre-pandemic pay levels and activities. The Company continues to monitor the global situation to be prepared for any further proactive measures that may be prudent.

The CEO Transition. As previously announced, Joe A. Raver, the Company’s prior President and Chief Executive Officer, retired at the end of calendar year 2021 and was succeeded by Kimberly K. Ryan, formerly President of the Company’s Coperion business, who at the time of the announcement in June 2021 was named the Company’s Executive Vice President. Effective upon her election, Ms. Ryan gained responsibility for the Company’s businesses, including Mold-Masters, Milacron Injection Molding & Extrusion, Coperion, and Batesville. The leaders of these businesses reported directly to Ms. Ryan during her service as Executive Vice President, and now that she is President and Chief Executive Officer, they continue to report directly to her. In connection with the CEO transition, Ms. Ryan led the development and execution of their strategies and business plans. In addition, the Senior Vice President, Operations Center of Excellence and HOM and the Vice President, Global Supply Management and Chief Procurement Officer began reporting to Ms. Ryan in fiscal 2022, and the remaining members of the Company’s Executive Management Team began to report to Ms. Ryan upon Mr. Raver’s retirement.

The Compensation Committee made some adjustments to Ms. Ryan’s compensation in connection with her election as Executive Vice President, including a nine percent increase to her base salary (approximately 28 percent annualized) and to increase the multiplier for her STIC award to 90 percent (up from 75 percent) for the period of her broader responsibilities following her election as Executive Vice President. No changes were made to her LTIC awards in connection with her election as Executive Vice President.

After the end of the fiscal year, the Board of Directors approved a new employment agreement and change in control agreement with Ms. Ryan, on substantially similar terms as the Company’s prior such agreement with Mr. Raver. Ms. Ryan’s compensation as President and CEO includes an annual base salary of $825,000 and an annual bonus target at 110 percent of base salary. Ms. Ryan also remains eligible to participate in the Company’s annual equity-based awards under our LTIC program.

Factors Considered in Setting Compensation

As fiscal 2021 began to show signs of recovery, the

The Compensation Committee continued to diligently and flexibly apply the principles of our Executive Compensation Philosophy in setting compensation for our Named Executive Officers.Officers in fiscal 2023. Indeed, the Compensation Committee considers and analyzes a number of factors when establishing and adjusting the elements of our executive compensation program and the compensation packages for the Named Executive Officers. The Compensation Committee strives to establish compensation packages that enable the Company to attract, retain, and motivate the executive talent needed to operate the Company in a manner that is in the best interests of the shareholders.

49

The primary factors that the Compensation Committee considers are discussed below. They are not discussed in any order of priority, and no one factor standing alone determines the outcome or is necessarily more important than the others.

Peer Group Data.The Compensation Committee compares the components and levels of our compensation program to those of a selected peer group of companies. Our Compensation Committee believes that we have to remain competitive in comparison to our industry peers in order to attract, retain, and motivate our executive talent.

Our Compensation Committee benchmarks the target compensation of our Named Executive Officers to the 50th50th percentile of the compensation paid by our peer group, although actual
50


compensation paid in any given year may be above or below the benchmark, as a result of the performance-based nature of our executive compensation program and a variety of other factors that the Compensation Committee considers in setting compensation, including: level and breadth of experience and responsibility of the officer; the complexity of the position; individual performance and growth potential; the difficulty of replacement; the individual’s tenure in his/her role; and internal equity.

The Compensation Committee reviews the composition of the Company’s peer group at least annually and, as appropriate, updates the group to reflect changes among peer companies, industry consolidation, and the Company’s own evolution as a global diversifiedpure-play industrial company. In considering our peer group, our Compensation Committee, aided by its independent compensation consultant, reviews various business attributes and financial metrics to assess whether additions or deletions to the current peer group are appropriate. Qualitative factors considered in developing the peer group include the complexity of a company’s product line, extent of its global operations, and number of business units. Quantitative factors include revenues, EBITDA, market capitalization, enterprise value, and number of employees, among others. In addition, various members of management provide input to the Compensation Committee relative to understanding the Company’s key financial metrics, key competitors for talent, key competitors in the end markets we serve, the Company’s business plan, and other factors. Notwithstanding the above, decisions regarding the composition of the peer group ultimately rest with the Compensation Committee.

50


In

At the start of fiscal 2021,2023, the peer group in place, which was utilized to benchmark target compensation for our Named Executive Officers, consisted of the following 20 companies, as disclosed in the Company’s 2022 proxy statement:

Acuity Brands, Inc.
Crane Co.
Donaldson Company, Inc.
Dover Corporation
ESAB Corporation
Flowserve Corporation
Fortive Corporation
HNI Corporation
IDEX Corporation
Itron, Inc.
MillerKnoll, Inc.
Nordson Corporation
Regal Rexnord Corporation
Steelcase Inc.
Tempur Sealy International, Inc.
The Middleby Corporation
The Timken Company
Waters Corporation
Woodward, Inc.
Xylem Inc.

During fiscal 2023, the Compensation Committee conducted a detailed review of but made no changesthe peer group and determined to remove certain of those peer companies, and to add other new peer companies, in order to better reflect the Company’s divestiture of its Batesville business and transformation into a pure-play industrial company. As a result, Flowserve Corporation, HNI Corporation, MillerKnoll, Inc., Steelcase, Inc., Tempur Sealy International, Inc., Waters Corporation, and Xylem Inc. were removed from the Company’s peer group. Meanwhile, the Compensation Committee added Barnes Group Inc., Chart Industries, Inc., ITT Inc., John Bean Technology Corp., and Kennametal Inc. to the peer group, which was last changed in 2020.group. Therefore, the peer group (excluding the Company) forat the end of fiscal 20212023 consisted of the following 2018 companies:


51



Acuity Brands, Inc.

Colfax Corporation

Barnes Group Inc.
Chart Industries, Inc.
Crane Co.

Donaldson Company, Inc.

Dover Corporation

Flowserve

ESAB Corporation

Fortive Corporation

Herman Miller, Inc.

HNI Corporation

IDEX Corporation

Itron, Inc.

ITT Inc.
John Bean Technology Corp.
Kennametal Inc.
Nordson Corporation

Regal Rexnord Corporation

Steelcase Inc.

Tempur Sealy International, Inc.

The Middleby Corporation

The Timken Company

Waters Corporation

Woodward, Inc.

Xylem Inc.

Independent Compensation Consultant Expertise. The Compensation Committee engages an independent compensation consultant to provide various items of relevant information and to perform various services in connection with the establishment of the elements of our executive compensation program. The Compensation Committee seeks and considers the expert advice and recommendations of the independent compensation consultant in connection with the design of our compensation program and the establishment of appropriate compensation components and levels with respect to our Named Executive Officers. Deloitte Consulting was the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant from May 2018 through June 2021. Beginning in July 2021, theThe Compensation Committee retained Pay Governance as its independent compensation consultant.

consultant for fiscal 2023.

The independent compensation consultant advises the Compensation Committee on an ongoing basis with regard to the general competitive landscape and trends in compensation matters, including (i) incentive plan design, (ii) peer group selection and competitive market analyses, (iii) compensation risk management, and (iv) developments in emerging trends and practices. The consultant attends meetings of the Compensation Committee and at the request of the Chairperson participates in its executive sessions.

See “Compensation Consultant Matters” in Part IV of “Executive Compensation” below for additional information regarding the Compensation Committee’s engagement of Deloitte Consulting and Pay Governance as its compensation consultants in fiscal 2021, as well as amounts paid to Deloitte Consulting and its affiliates during fiscal 2021 for executive compensation consulting and other services.

2023.

Survey Data. In addition to peer group data, the Compensation Committee considers published compensation survey data provided by its independent compensation consultant, focusing on compensation data for companies in the manufacturing industry with revenues within a comparable range ofto the Company’s revenue. The survey data provides additionalsupplements other factors considered in setting executive compensation dataas a reference for market compensation levels and is targeted to the specific job responsibilities of our senior executives.

External Market Conditions. When establishing the total compensation of each Named Executive Officer, the Compensation Committee also considers external market conditions, which include competitive pressures for the executive’s particular position within the industry, economic developments, and the condition of the labor markets.

51

PerformanceIndividual performance of our Named Executive Officers is evaluated in large part based upon the achievement of collective and personal goals that are evaluated and established by

52


management and approved by the Compensation Committee each year. TheseThe goals for fiscal 20212023 are described below.

2021

2023 Collective Performance Goals. Management identified and the Compensation Committee approved six common objectives for all of our Named Executive Officers for fiscal 2021.2023. They were as follows:


Ensure successful operating company performance – provide oversight and resources needed to generate profitable organic and acquisition growth, strong cash flows, and improved return on invested capital. This will be accomplished through the establishment of clear goals and objectives, appropriate oversight to ensure goal achievement, a transparent resource allocation process, and a commitment to the HOM.


Actively manage the Company’s portfolio to align with its strategy to build scalable platforms – identify prudent acquisition opportunities that meet our strategic criteria, provide attractive long-term returns for shareholders, generate profitable revenue and earnings per share growth, and leverage the HOM. Ensure acquisition success by planning, preparing for, and executing due diligence and integration with excellence, focusing on the critical few key areas of greatest value generation. Identify, plan, prepare for, and execute divestitures and other strategic alternatives as appropriate.


Implement and expand the HOM – drive the foundation of the HOM across the enterprise, leveraging the framework to produce sustainable and predictable results. Enhance and teach the organization the fundamentals and management practices at the core of the HOM. Expand the HOM to include additional practices and tools aimed at expanding enterprise value. Implement the HOM in newly acquired companies.


Develop world class corporate capabilities to support the Company’s strategy and projected growth – make certain that resources, processes, procedures, technology, and controls are aligned with the Company’s transformation strategy.


Maintain a strong, deep, and diverse talent pool – ensure the experiences and skill sets necessary to achieve the corporate strategy are present in the organization. This will be accomplished by creating an environment so compelling that we can attract, further develop, and retain top talent individuals.8


Execute on year 2 of the Milacron integration with excellence – drive the execution of the integration plan across all work streams with a focus on synergy achievement and long-term shareholder value.

Ensure successful operating company performance – provide oversight and resources needed to generate profitable organic and acquisition growth, strong cash flows, and improved return on invested capital. This will be accomplished through the establishment of clear goals and objectives, appropriate oversight to ensure goal achievement, a transparent resource allocation process, a continued increase in the education, adoption, and results expectations of the HOM for both manufacturing and commercial elements of the Company, and by driving innovative new product offerings.
Actively manage the Company’s portfolio to align with its strategy to build scalable platforms – identify prudent acquisition opportunities that meet our strategic criteria, provide attractive long-term returns for shareholders, generate profitable revenue and earnings per share growth, and leverage the HOM. Ensure acquisition success by planning, preparing for, and executing due diligence and integration with excellence, focusing on the critical few key areas of greatest value generation. Identify, plan, and execute divestitures and other strategic alternatives as appropriate.
Accelerate our progress on developing a strong, deep, and diverse talent pool and building an inclusive culture – ensure the experiences and skill sets necessary to achieve the corporate strategy are present in the organization, especially in creating a more representative workforce. This will be accomplished by creating an inclusive environment so that we can attract, further develop, and retain top talent individuals from within the Company and from the talent market. Play a leading role in embedding our Purpose and Core Values throughout the organization.
Progress and execute on our efforts on ESG activities – drive substantial improvement in our defined key metrics enterprise-wide on sustainability related initiatives to help drive sustainable growth, value for our customers, developmental opportunities for our employees, and contributions to the communities in which we operate.
Continue to drive the implementation of the HOM – drive the foundation of the HOM across the enterprise, leveraging the framework to produce sustainable and predictable results. Enhance and teach the organization the fundamentals and management practices at the core of the HOM. Expand the HOM to include additional practices and tools aimed at expanding enterprise value and growth, and driving productivity improvement programs. Implement the HOM in newly acquired companies.
Develop world class corporate capabilities to support the Company’s strategy and projected growth; make certain that resources, processes, procedures, technology, and controls are aligned with the Company’s transformation strategy.
53

8 For the second six-month measurement period of fiscal 2021, the Compensation Committee added the creation of specific plans to increase workforce diversity as part of this collective performance goal. As described below, an individual officer’s



2023 Individual Performance Factor for STIC purposes is based upon his or her execution of collective performance goals, among other factors.

52

2021 Individual Performance Goals. The following uniqueUnique personal objectives were identified for each of the Named Executive Officers for fiscal 2021:

2023, as described below:

For Mr. Raver –
Name/TitleGoals
Kimberly K. RyanDevelop and execute the Company’s strategy and business plan and achieve the Company’s financial and operational objectives; allocate capital to create shareholder value; lead the Company’s growth initiatives; oversee the Company’s acquisition and divestiture activities; overseechampion the efforts focused on DEI and ESG initiatives designed to drive sustainable growth, value for our customers, developmental opportunities for our employees, and contributions to the communities in which we operate; strengthen the talent pool, capabilities, and competencies of the Company; and ensure that the Company engages in appropriate, meaningful, and transparent conversations with key stakeholders.stakeholders; and champion our culture shaping initiative from concept to implementation, driving understanding and adoption across the enterprise.


Robert M. VanHimbergen
For Ms. Cerniglia –
Provide financial and information technology leadership with excellence to the Company and where necessary, its subsidiaries; ensure thatestablish appropriate processes and procedures for the corporate financial and enterprise information systems (EIS) functions are in place;function; ensure that appropriate internal controls to safeguard financial assets and proprietary information are developed and maintained and there is adherence to accounting rules, including those recently adopted; employ Leana continuous improvement mindset and activities throughout the finance and EIS functionsfunction to increase efficiency, effectiveness, productivity, and effectiveness;quality; manage financial and information technology due diligence and integration efforts in the Companys acquisition activities; ensure there is a high performing corporate finance and EIS team with the appropriate experiences and skill sets; and lead all aspects of the Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) process in alignment with the strategy management process with focuses on cybersecurity and early identification and mitigating action for significant risks to the business. Leadbusiness; and ensure there is a high performing corporate finance team with the overall Milacron integration effort, including oversight of the Integration Management Office, developingappropriate experiences and approving synergy targets and related action plansskill sets to achieve, and ensuring a clear link to the Company’s financial statements. Develop and execute the strategic and operating plans of the Company’s DME business; grow revenue, income before taxes (“IBT”) and cash flow organically by penetrating growing end markets, accelerating geographic expansion and driving improved operational performance; use HOM to realize the full value of the DME organization and to deliver sustainable and predictable results.drive business continuity.


Ulrich Bartel
For Ms. Ryan – Develop and execute the strategy and operating plans of the Coperion and Rotex;Rotex Operating Companies constituting the Advanced Process Solutions segment (APS); grow revenue, IBT,EBITDA, and cash flow organically by penetrating growing end markets, accelerating geographic expansion and driving improved operational performance; use HOM to realize the full value of the Coperion and Rotex organizations and to deliver sustainable and predictable results; and identify, execute, and integrate future strategic acquisitions in line with the CoperionAPS segment strategies; and Rotex strategies. Workensure there is a high performing team with Strategyappropriate experiences and Corporate Development on identifying, planning, preparing for, and executing the divestiture of the ABEL business.9, 10skill sets to drive business continuity.

9 The Company completed the divestiture of its ABEL business in March 2021. In addition, in connection with her election as Executive Vice President, Ms. Ryan took over supervisory responsibility for the Company’s businesses, including Mold-Masters, Milacron Injection Molding & Extrusion, Coperion, and Batesville, after the Company’s annual process for identifying individual performance goals. Thus, Ms. Ryan was also given the following goal with respect to the Company’s businesses in connection with her election: development and execution of their strategies and business plans to drive profitable growth.

53


Nicholas R. Farrell
For Mr. Trainor – Develop and execute the strategic and operating plan of Batesville; use HOM to realize the full value of the Batesville organization and to deliver sustainable and predictable results; maintain the strong cash flow generation capabilities of Batesville; ensure the organization is sized appropriately to demand; continue to gain efficiencies and maintain margin through Lean; and provide talentProvide legal counsel with excellence to the rest ofCompany and its subsidiaries; ensure appropriate processes and procedures for the organization.10 Worklegal function are in place; oversee all securities and public company governance matters; ensure appropriate compliance programs are in place and followed; co-lead the Company’s ESG efforts; employ the HOM throughout the legal function to increase efficiency, effectiveness, productivity, and quality; manage legal due diligence efforts, transaction documentation, and integration in the Company’s acquisition activities; manage all litigation involving the Company; and ensure there is a high performing legal team with Strategyappropriate experiences and Corporate Development on identifying, planning, preparing for, and executing the divestiture of the TerraSource Global business.skill sets to drive business continuity.


J. Michael Whitted
For Mr. Whitted – Lead the execution of Hillenbrand’s inorganic growth strategy; oversee the work of multi-disciplinary teams involved in the Company’s acquisition and divestiture efforts, particularly in opportunity identification and analysis, due diligence, and integration; foster global M&A relationships; and assist with integration of acquired companies in coordination with the CEO/CFO,CFO/GC, the M&A Committee, and OpCoOperating Company leadership teams. Successfully lead the planning, preparation, and execution of the divestitures of the ABEL, TerraSource Global, and Red Valve business units.

Aggregate Compensation. The Compensation Committee considers the aggregate value of the Named Executive Officers’ core compensation components of base salary and STIC and LTIC at target levels. The Compensation Committee compares the aggregate amount of these elements for our Named Executive Officers to the aggregate amount of the same elements of executive officer compensation at other companies using peer group and survey data. The Compensation Committee generally targets total direct compensation levels at the median, including for new hires or promotions, but total pay opportunity levels may vary above or below depending on experience level and other
54


factors. For example, a newly hired executive with substantial experience may be provided with above median compensation, whereas a newly promoted executive from within the Company may be targeted below the median due to their newness to the position.

Additionally, the Compensation Committee periodically reviews “tally sheets” reflecting all compensation paid to our Named Executive Officers, including retirement and other benefits and perquisites, and amounts potentially payable to them upon a “change in control” of the Company. The Compensation Committee also considers projections as to the potential future value of long-term equity awards made to the Named Executive Officers.

Shareholder Say on Pay Vote. At each Annual Meeting of the Company’s shareholders since 2011, the Company has held a “Say on Pay Vote,” which is a non-binding advisory resolution stating that shareholders approve the compensation paid to the Company’s Named Executive Officers. The Compensation Committee carefully considers the results of this vote each year. Company shareholders have approved the Say on Pay Vote with over 94 percent support each year for the past eightten years. The Compensation Committee believes that the historical level of support for these votes reflects favorably on the Company’s executive compensation program and the actions taken by our Compensation Committee.



55

10 In connection with Ms. Ryan’s election as Executive Vice President, Mr. Trainor took over secondary supervisory responsibilities of the Company’s Rotex business, after the Company’s annual process for identifying individual performance goals. Thus, in addition to the personal objectives identified above, in connection with Ms. Ryan’s election as Executive Vice President, Mr. Trainor was also given the following goals for Rotex for the latter part of 2021: develop and execute the strategic and operating plan of Rotex; grow revenue, IBT, and cash flow organically by penetrating growing end markets, accelerating geographic expansion, and driving improved operational performance; use HOM to realize the full value of the Rotex organization and to deliver sustainable and predictable results; and identify, execute, and integrate future strategic acquisitions in line with the Rotex strategy.


54

Compensation of Our Named Executive Officers for Fiscal 2021

2023

Compensation-Setting Process.Prior to or shortly after the start of each fiscal year, our Compensation Committee and its consultant, as well as our President and CEO, take steps to establish that year’s compensation program and performance for the preceding fiscal year as detailedshown in the table below. This process was generally followed in fiscal 2021 with some modifications to the historical program determined to be advisable in light of the ongoing uncertainty in global markets relating to the COVID-19 pandemic. Most significant in this regard, the Compensation Committee approved use of two consecutive six-month measurement periods for STIC rather than the traditional one twelve-month period and modified the payout curves, as described below. In addition, for the second six-month STIC measurement period, the Compensation Committee added the creation of specific plans to increase workforce diversity as part of the Named Executive Officers’ collective performance goal relating to diverse talent pools. The Compensation Committee approved this approach for STIC after discussing and considering various factors, including the uncertainty in global markets relating to the COVID-19 pandemic. Although measured in two periods, STIC was only paid once, after the end of the fiscal year, consistent with past practice.

Compensation ConsultantCompensation Committee
Develop
Compensation ConsultantCompensation Committee
Develops Executive Compensation Market Analysis (“ECMA”) that reports competitive compensation data using disclosures from the Company’s compensation peer group, and supplemented with data from variousindustry-relevant, published compensation surveyssurveys.
Discusses the recommendations, reviews individual performance, and considers Company performance data and competitive benchmark information
for all Named Executive Officers.
Solicits feedback from each director regarding the CEO’s performance during the prior year, with feedback based on CEO’s self-review and each director’s own independent evaluation
evaluation.
Meets in executive session with the full Board present without the CEO present to determine the CEO’s performance-based compensation11 for the current fiscal year and core compensation for the following fiscal year.9
President and CEOApproves base salaries and target STIC and LTIC awards for all Named Executive Officers for the new fiscal yearyear.
Develops recommendationrecommendations for Named Executive Officer compensation (other than hisher own) based on ECMAECMA.
Develops self-review for her individual performance in the prior year.
Determines the performance objectives of and the formula to calculate the STIC and LTIC awards for the new fiscal year, along with the LTIC award mix12
Develops self-review for his individual performance in the prior yearall Named Executive Officers.
With support from the Company’s internal audit team, certifies performance for STIC and LTIC and confirms the computation of the actual STIC awards to be paid to the Named Executive Officers with respect to the prior fiscal year13year.
The individual components of our Named Executive Officers’ 2023 compensation packages are described in further detail below.













11 9A summary of these discussions is provided to the CEO and is also used to set the CEO’s compensation and leadership goals for the following year.

12 As described above, in fiscal 2021, target-setting was conducted twice for STIC, once in each consecutive six-month performance period although no change was made to the formula.

13 The Compensation Committee reviewed results of the first six-month performance period in connection with setting targets for the second six-month performance period, but as described above, this certification and confirmation process and the ensuing payouts took place only once, after the end of the fiscal year.

55
56



The individual components of our Named Executive Officers’ 2021 compensation packages are described in further detail below.

Base Salaries. Base salary for our Named Executive Officers other than Mr. Raver remained flat for the first fiscal quarter, as their regularly scheduled merit-based salary increases were cancelled in connection with the COVID-19 pandemic. Merit increases resumed in January 2021. Our Named Executive Officers were paid the following base salaries1410 during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2021:

2023:
NameBase Salary
Joe A. RaverName$865,327Base Salary
Kristina A. Cerniglia$561,609
Kimberly K. Ryan$565,545916,346
Christopher H. Trainor
Robert M. VanHimbergen$474,370525,577
Ulrich Bartel$455,157
Nicholas R. Farrell$533,854
J. Michael Whitted$435,870472,977


The Compensation Committee believes these salaries are not only appropriate in light of available comparative data and the total mix of compensation for each of these officers but alsoand necessary in order to provide a guaranteed level of income to aid in the attraction and retention of talent in a competitive market.

Annual Cash Incentive Awards.
The payment of annual cash STIC to our Named Executive Officers for fiscal 20212023 was formula-based and governed by our SecondThird Amended and Restated Short-Term Incentive Compensation Plan for Key Executives (“STIC Plan”). The STIC Plan is designed to motivate our Named Executive Officers to perform and to meet both collective and individual objectives. Itobjectives, including to contribute to Company and, where applicable, business unit performance goals, by providing for performance-based incentive compensation. To support this design, the STIC Plan contains provisions that specifically contemplate awards based on performance periods that may differ from our fiscal year; permits the use of various award types, including discretionary bonuses; and provides authority to adjust performance goals or related achievement levels to reflect changes in business operations, corporate transactions, or similar events. Our STIC Plan is consistent with our philosophy that employees should share in the Company’s success when our short-term financial objectives are achieved, as we believe such achievement ultimately results in creating value for our shareholders. The potential to be paid short-term cash incentive awards plays an important role in the attraction and retention of our Named Executive Officers.

Effective in

At the beginning of each fiscal 2022,year, the Company adopted the Third Amended and Restated Short-Term Incentive Compensation PlanCommittee approves each Named Executive Officer’s target STIC award. The target STIC award opportunities for Key Executives (the “Restated STIC Plan”) to replace the STIC Plan,our Named Executive Officers for 2023, expressed as previously reported. While generally following the STIC Plan’s historical approaches to incentive compensation, the Restated STIC Plan expands the lista percentage of potential performance goals to include additional financial and operational metrics, as well as diversity, equity, and inclusion (DE&I) and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) metrics. It also contains provisions that specifically contemplate awards based on performance periods that may differ from our fiscal year; permits the use of discretionary bonuses; and continues to provide authority to adjust performance goals or related achievement levels to reflect changes in business operations, corporate transactions, or similar events.

annual base salary, remained unchanged

14 10The salary amounts shown in this table vary slightly from those shown in the “Summary Compensation Table” in Part III below because this table reflects salary actually paid during the fiscal year, while the “Summary Compensation Table” is presented based on salary earned during the fiscal year. The salary paid shown in this table is the basis used for the annual cash incentiveSTIC calculation described below.

56in this proxy statement.

At the beginning of each fiscal year, the Compensation Committee approves each Named Executive Officer’s target STIC award. As explained above,Mr. Bartel is based in fiscal 2021, this approval was predicated on the use of two six-month performance periods, with targets for the second performance period approved after completion of the first. The target STIC award opportunities, expressed as a percentage of annual base salary, remained unchanged from 2020 levels for those Named Executive OfficersGermany and employed by usHillenbrand Germany Holding GmbH. The amounts reported in this table, and throughout this proxy statement, that were paid in Euros have been converted to U.S. dollars at an average exchange rate for fiscal 2020,2023 of .9369 EUR per $1.00 USD based on Bloomberg data.

57


from 2022 levels, other than an increase in Mr. Raver’s target STIC award opportunity to incentivize continued high performance and in Ms. Ryan’s target STIC award opportunity to reflectcontinue her promotiontransition to Executive Vice President.

market median and to incentivize continued high performance.
11 These appear below.

Name

2021
Name2023 Target STIC Opportunity

(as a % of base salary)
Joe A. Raver120%
Kristina A. Cerniglia 75%
Kimberly K. Ryan      80% 15115%
Christopher H. Trainor75%
Robert M. VanHimbergen75%
Ulrich Bartel75%
Nicholas R. Farrell70%
J. Michael Whitted75%


Our formula for calculating the STIC awards payable to our Named Executive Officers for fiscal 20212023 was as follows, with the first three steps repeated for each performance period:


follows:

Target.jpg

For 2021,2023, the Company Performance Factor was based on our achievement of designated levels of “Adjusted IBT,EBITDA,” “Net Revenue” (or, solely for the Company’s Coperion business,or “Order Intake”)Intake12, and “Cash Conversion Cycle” (or CCC), each of which is further described in Appendix A. The Company Performance Factor calculation was performed with respect to each of the fiscal 2021 six-month performance periods, which are referred to as “H1” and “H2” in certain instances in the following discussion,16 and applied to the base salary in the relevant performance period. These performance metrics translate to operational and financial performance, efficiency, and sustainable improvement. The metrics generally track the performance of Hillenbrand, Inc. on a consolidated basis, but for a Named Executive Officer who has direct responsibility to a business unit other than Hillenbrand, Inc., 75 percent of the Company Performance Factor is allocated to the performance of the relevant business unit(s), as set forth in the following chart:








15 11 In fiscal 2022, Ms. Ryan’s Target STIC Opportunity was disclosed as 105%. This percentage reflectsreflected a blended rate of 7590 percent for eightthree months of the fiscal year until her election as Chief Executive Vice PresidentOfficer and 90110 percent for the fournine months of the fiscal year thereafter.

16 The H1 and H2 Company Performance Factors are used

12 Order Intake replaces Net Revenue for our Coperion subsidiary as further detailed in completing the STIC calculation for each performance period in fiscal 2021, which are then multiplied against a single Individual Performance Factor with the two resulting payouts added together to determine each Named Executive Officer’s overall payout.

this section.
57
58





 Percentage Of Company Performance Factor Allocated To….

Name

Hillenbrand

Batesville

Coperion
Joe A. Raver100%
Kristina A. Cerniglia100%
Kimberly K. Ryan17  25%75%
 100%
Christopher H. Trainor  25%75%
J. Michael Whitted100%

Percentage Of Company Performance Factor Allocated To….
NameHillenbrandCoperion
Kimberly K. Ryan100%
Robert M. VanHimbergen100%
Ulrich Bartel25%75%
Nicholas R. Farrell100%
J. Michael Whitted100%
The 2021 financial performance targets under the STIC Plan for each of Hillenbrand and theits applicable operating divisions, along with the actual results and payout levels,1813 were as follows:

HillenbrandWeightThresholdTargetMaximumActual Results
Payout
Level
Adjusted EBITDA 14
50%$503$552$591$51879%
Net Revenue 15
25%$2,922$3,211$3,436$2,866–%
CCC25%68.5 Days57.1 Days45.7 Days77.3 Days–%
Company Performance Factor for Hillenbrand (Consolidated)39.5%
CoperionWeightThresholdTargetMaximumActual ResultsPayout
Level
Adjusted EBITDA50%$284$315$341$30488.4%
Order Intake25%$1,595$1,772$1,914$1,493–%
CCC25%49.9 Days41.6 Days33.3 Days53.8 Days–%
Company Performance Factor for Coperion44.2%


Hillenbrand


Weight


Threshold

Target

Maximum
Actual Results

Payout

Level

H1 Adjusted IBT1950%$64.5$129.0$193.4$201.7200.0%
H2 Adjusted IBT19$94.2$188.3$282.5$206.8119.7%
H1 Net Revenue25%$637.2$1,274.5$1,911.7$1,561.8145.1%
H2 Net Revenue$760.4$1,520.9$2,281.3$1,663.6118.8%
H1 CCC25%93.4 days77.8 days62.3 days68.0 days163.5%
H2 CCC69.8 days58.2 days46.6 days47.5 days192.4%
Company Performance Factor for Hillenbrand (Consolidated)

H1 177.2%

H2 137.6%

17 The percentages in the first row reflect Ms. Ryan’s Company Performance Factor allocation of 25 percent Hillenbrand, 75 percent Coperion for the first eight months of the fiscal year until her election as Executive Vice President, from which point the allocation changed to 100 percent Hillenbrand, as shown in the second row.

18 13As part of the annual compensation setting process, the Compensation Committee translates percentage achievement of each STIC component into the payout levels used to arrive at the overall Company Performance Factor. Adjusted IBT,EBITDA, Net Revenue, and Order Intake are shown in millions.

19

14Adjusted IBTEBITDA at the Hillenbrand level reflects the impact of the full amount of corporate overhead costs for the enterprise.

58


Batesville


Weight


Threshold

Target

Maximum20
Actual ResultsPayout Level
H1 Adjusted IBT50%$28.3$56.5$84.8$92.8200.0%
H2 Adjusted IBT$23.2$46.4$69.6$59.1155.0%
H1 Net Revenue25%$135.7$271.4$407.2$330.0143.1%
H2 Net Revenue$131.8$263.5$395.3$292.4122.0%
H1 CCC25%45.1 days37.6 days30.1 days31.4 days183.0%
H2 CCC40.8 days34.0 days27.2 days26.6 days200.0%
Company Performance Factor for Batesville

H1 181.5%

H2 158.0%


Coperion


Weight


Threshold

Target

Maximum
Actual ResultsPayout Level
H1 Adjusted IBT50%$37.8$75.6$113.4$78.8108.5%
H2 Adjusted IBT$54.9$109.9$164.8$111.0102.0%
H1 Order Intake25%$242.1$484.3$726.4$650.6168.7%
H2 Order Intake$333.3$666.5$999.8$770.8131.3%
H1 CCC25%44.3 days36.9 days29.5 days32.6 days157.9%
H2 CCC34.8 days29.0 days23.2 days7.1 days200.0%
Company Performance Factor for Coperion

H1 135.9%

H2 133.8%

15The Compensation Committee set the payout curvetargets for Net Revenue and CCC for fiscal 20212023 were influenced by the timing of the divestiture of our historical Batesville business as the targets were modified per the STIC Plan upon the divestiture in order to account for the significant uncertaintyfinancial impacts of the divestiture. Historically, Batesville’s CCC was significantly lower than the rest of Hillenbrand and as Batesville was divested four months into the fiscal year, the fiscal 2023 Net Revenue target was lower and the CCC target was higher compared to fiscal 2022 results.

59



Coperion’s Order Intake is the value of firm orders received from customers (net of all cancellations), as further defined in Appendix A, and is used in lieu of Net Revenue for STIC calculations as a measure that more accurately reflects our Coperion subsidiary’s business cycles.

For fiscal 2023, the Compensation Committee conducted a comprehensive review of the performance and payout curves associated with the metrics within the STIC plan and determined that the wider and flatter curves used in the global markets atprior two fiscal years in order to address the time relatedeconomic and supply chain uncertainty brought about by COVID were no longer necessary or appropriate. Therefore, the Compensation Committee set performance and payout curves to levels more consistent with pre-pandemic levels, and which aligned with the COVID-19 pandemic, by wideninggoing-forward needs of the Company.16

The following table shows the fiscal 2023 performance and flatteningpayout curves:
ThresholdTargetMaximum
Adjusted EBITDA50%100%200%
Revenue/Order Intake50%100%200%
CCC50%100%200%
The Compensation Committee periodically evaluates the curveappropriateness of individual STIC components and potential payout percentages relating to Adjusted STIC, Revenue, and Order Intake:

20 In light of Batesville’s anticipated performance during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic,makes changes as warranted. For fiscal 2023, the Compensation Committee determined, among other STIC program updates, to align the maximum payout for Batesville with that of other operating companies for fiscal 2021. In recent years, the maximum has been 175 percent.

59

 ThresholdTargetMaximum
Adjusted IBT0%100%200%
Revenue0%100%200%
Order Intake0%100%200%
CCC50%100%200%

The Compensation Committee determined to keep the curve for fiscal 2021 CCC consistent with the Company’s recent historical practice. The Compensation Committee believes that the changes toreplace the Adjusted IBT Revenue,measure with an Adjusted EBITDA measure. The updated measure further aligns internal compensation with externally reported metrics while preserving the overall focuses of top- and Order Intake curves for fiscal 2021, alongbottom-line growth, together with use of two six-month performance periods, decreased the likelihood of not only an inappropriately low payout, which could have created retention risk for our workforce, but also an inappropriately high payout, which could have underminedhealthy cash generation, and the Company’s compensation philosophy. In lightbalance of continued uncertainty in the global markets, the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, and global supply chain disruptions, among other factors,STIC components. For fiscal 2024, the Compensation Committee has determined to maintainlower the fiscal 2021threshold for Adjusted EBITDA to a 33 1/3% payout curves for fiscal 2022.

80% of the target (from a 50% payout for 85% of the target) to mitigate against artificial “cliffs” and to meet the going forward needs of the Company.

The definitions for each of the STIC performance metrics are set forth in Appendix A. Each of these performance metrics is also adjusted for the effects of certain unusual or infrequent items, which are generally determined in advance by the Compensation Committee, during or as close as possible to the first quarter of each performance period, and may include, among other things:


acquisitions made during the fiscal year (plan targets are adjusted accordingly);


divestitures made during the fiscal year (plan targets are adjusted accordingly); and


the foreign exchange translation of income statements at exchange rates that differ from those assumed in the STIC Plan.

acquisitions made during the fiscal year (plan targets are adjusted accordingly);
divestitures made during the fiscal year (plan targets are adjusted accordingly); and
the foreign exchange translation of income statements at exchange rates that differ from those assumed in the STIC Plan.
The final results for these performance metrics are used to calculate the Company Performance Factor at the end of the applicable performance period. After the end of the fiscal year, the Board or Compensation Committee assigns an Individual Performance Factor to each Named Executive Officer

16 The CCC curve did not change during COVID because the Compensation Committee determined that the pandemic and associated supply chain disruptions were not likely to have the same kind of potentially distortive impacts on CCC as on the other components.
60


based on its review of the CEO’s assessment of the officer’s performance during the performance period, including performance relative to his or her individual and collective objectives described above under the heading “Factors Considered in Setting Compensation.” For fiscal 2021,2023, this review was conducted once, at the end of the fiscal year. The Individual Performance Factor can range from 1.0x at target performance, to 1.2x for superior performance, and to below 1.0x if target levels have not been achieved.

60

For fiscal 2021,2023, STIC awards for our Named Executive Officers were calculated as described above, and the Compensation Committee certified performance and confirmed the following calculation:


Name
Target STIC Award21x

Applicable Company

Performance

Factor

xIndividual Performance Factor=

Total STIC

Award

Paid22

Joe A. RaverH1 $513,392 H1 177.2% 105% $1,713,700
 H2 $525,000 H2 137.6%  
        
Kristina A. CernigliaH1 $207,396 H1 177.2% 105% $694,800
 H2 $213,810 H2 137.6%  
        
Kimberly K. RyanH1 $192,140 H1 146.2% 105% $672,400
 H2 $262,954 H2 136.7%  
        
Christopher H. TrainorH1 $173,222 H1 180.4% 105% $621,200
 H2 $182,555 H2 152.9%  
        
J. Michael WhittedH1 $161,950 H1 177.2% 105% $539,600
 H2 $164,953 H2 137.6%  

Cash-Based Retention Award in Fiscal 2021

Name
Target STIC Award 17
x
 Applicable
Company
Performance
Factor
xIndividual Performance Factor =
Total
STIC
Award
Paid
Kimberly K. Ryan$1,053,79839.5%100%$416,250
Robert M. VanHimbergen$394,18339.5%105%$163,487
Ulrich Bartel$349,09943%95%$142,607
Nicholas R. Farrell$373,69839.5%
120% 18
$177,133
J. Michael Whitted$354,73339.5%
120% 19
$168,143

Long-Term Incentive Compensation
Overview. As described above, the Company’s annual STIC program is designedWe provide LTIC to motivate our Named Executive Officers and other employees by awarding them a combination of time-based restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and performance-based RSUs. In setting the amount of each annual LTIC award granted to perform and is the primary vehicle for performance-based cash compensation. But when advisable under the circumstances,our Named Executive Officers, the Compensation Committee may consider additional compensation for certain key executives. In a time of CEO transition and broader market uncertainty related to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, the Compensation Committee determined in fiscal 2021 that senior executive departures could have a significant negative impactbases its decision on business results and concluded that consideration of additional retention awards was warranted.

Thus, given the essential role of the finance function in connection with the CEO transition and in order to support her retention and business continuity during this period, in fiscal 2021 the Compensation Committee approved a one-time cash retention award for Kristina A. Cerniglia,comparative data from the Company’s Senior Vice Presidentcompensation peer group and Chief Financial Officer. The Compensation Committee also considered Ms. Cerniglia’s skills and experience, sustainedapplicable survey data, benchmarked at the 50th percentile, while aiming to encourage high performance, and long tenure atresulting in the Company in making this award. The cash award, which is in addition to an equity award described below, has a total grant date value of $1,000,000, to be paid in three installments within 10 days after the applicable vesting date: $650,000 on December 31, 2021; $250,000 on March 31, 2022; and $100,000 on July 1, 2022, subject in each case to Ms. Cerniglia’s continued employment on each such date. Each cash award will vest in full if Ms. Cerniglia’s employment is terminated by the Company without cause prior to the applicable vesting date and each award will be forfeited if Ms. Cerniglia’s employment is terminated for any other reason prior to such vesting date.

LTIC awards set forth below.







21 17The target STIC award is calculated as base salary earnings times the individual’s target bonus percentage; the calculation uses salary amounts that vary slightly from those shown in the “Summary Compensation Table” in Part III below because that table is presented based on salary earned during the fiscal year, while fiscal 20212023 STIC awards are calculated based on salary actually paid.

18 Mr. Farrell’s Individual Performance Factor reflects his leadership and execution of the Company’s successful portfolio changes during the applicable six-month performance period.

22 fiscal year which transformed the Company into a pure-play industrial.

19 Mr. Whitted’s Individual Performance Factor reflects his leadership and execution of the Company’s successful portfolio changes during the fiscal year which transformed the Company into a pure-play industrial.
61


Name2022 LTIC
Opportunity
2023 LTIC
Opportunity
Kimberly K. Ryan$3,000,000$4,350,000
Robert M. VanHimbergen$1,100,000$1,240,000
Ulrich Bartel20
N/A$800,000
Nicholas R. Farrell$600,000$650,000
J. Michael Whitted$700,000$750,000
The Compensation Committee approved STIC award payments rounded to the nearest hundred dollars.

61

Long-Term Incentive Compensation

Overview. We provide LTIC to our Named Executive Officers and other employees by awarding them a combination of time-based restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and performance-based RSUs. Historically, our Named Executive Officers received their annual LTIC award as one-third stock options and two-thirds performance-based RSUs. Beginning with fiscal 2021, the Compensation Committee determined that the proportion of LTIC awards that historically consisted of stock options would,opportunity for Ms. Ryan was increased for fiscal 2021 and future awards, consistyear 2023 as part of time-based RSUs. The Compensation Committee made this change in an effortMs. Ryan’s continued transition to enhance the effectiveness of equity compensation in attracting and retaining talent in a competitive market. In particular, the Compensation Committee believes that this step brings the Company’s compensation practices more in line with the general market.23

In setting the amount of each annual LTIC award granted to our Named Executive Officers, the Compensation Committee bases its decision on comparative data from the Company’s compensation peer group, benchmarked at the 50th percentile, as well as aiming to encourage high performance. This process resulted in increased LTIC opportunities for most of our Named Executive Officers in fiscal 2021, as shown below.

Name

2020 LTIC Opportunity2021 LTIC Opportunity
Joe A. Raver$3,600,000$4,000,000
Kristina A. Cerniglia$950,000$1,050,000
Kimberly K. Ryan$850,000$950,000
Christopher H. Trainor$600,000$700,000
J. Michael Whitted$700,000$700,000

23 Also during fiscal 2021, as previously reported, our Stock Plan was amended and restated and approved by our shareholders in order to reflect market practice and make certain other updates, including to increase the number of shares of Company common stock reserved for issuance thereunder.

62median.


The Compensation Committee then allocated the 20212023 LTIC award opportunity to performance-based and time-based RSUs as follows:

Award Type

Allocation Of
LTIC Award
Value

Brief Description
Of Award Type

Performance-Based RSUs2/3

Performance measured over a three-year period commencing October 1, 2020

2022

Split equally between:

●      

awards that vest based on our shareholder value formula (“Shareholder Value RSUs”), and

●      

awards that vest based on our relative total shareholder return (“TSR”) formula (“Relative TSR RSUs”)

Time-Based RSUs1/3Number of RSUs set based on fair market value on date of award; vest over a three-year period









20 Mr. Bartel was not a Named Executive Officer in fiscal 2022.
62


We believe that by linking a significant portion of the pay of our Named Executive Officers to the achievement of targets over three years, our LTIC program shapes investment strategies that improve the Company’s value over the long term. Historically,At times over the course of the Company’s history, actual achievement levels have resulted in actual payouts of our various performance-based equity awards that cover almostnearly the full range of performance, between no payout (zero percent) to close to the maximum payout (175 percent). Looking atof 175 percent for historical awards. Beginning with awards granted during fiscal 2023, the maximum payout for Shareholder Value RSUs and Relative TSR RSUs was changed from 175 to 200 percent. The Compensation Committee made this change after assessing our twoexecutive compensation program in comparison to peers, survey data, and other factors. The change aligned with recommendations made by the Committee’s independent compensation consultant, as part of an effort to continue to incentivize executives to exceed target levels of performance, and for the Company to remain in general alignment with the market for executive talent.

In general, the Company’s annual performance-based RSU award types over the past several years, however, payouts have generally ranged from approximately 40 percent to approximately 120 percent of the targeted amount, with only few years exceedingfalling above or below that level.range. As a result, we believe the currentCompany’s LTIC award mix demonstrates the Company’s establishment ofstructure and overall program reflect appropriate stretch goals for each business cycle.

63

Compared to the average of our compensation peer group’s mix of long-term incentive compensation awards, our annual LTIC grants to Named Executive Officers in fiscal 2021 reflect general alignment2023 were generally aligned, but included a heavier emphasis on performance-based awards, as shown in the charts below.

Peer Group Average in Fiscal 2021*

Hillenbrand, Inc. in Fiscal 2021
  


2473924748

*Source: Proxy filings









63


The allocation of the annual LTIC award opportunity (excluding retention awards) in fiscal 20212023 among time-based RSUs, Shareholder Value RSUs, and Relative TSR RSUs resulted in the following targeted award levels (excluding accrued dividends):

  Performance-Based RSUs At Target
Name24Time-Based RSUsShareholder ValueRelative TSR
Joe A. Raver34,76734,76734,767
Kristina A. Cerniglia9,1269,1269,126
Kimberly K. Ryan8,2578,2578,257
Christopher H. Trainor6,0846,0846,084
J. Michael Whitted6,0846,0846,084

Time-Based RSUs. The time-based RSUs awarded in fiscal 2021 vest ratably on the first, second, and third anniversaries(as of the grant date (1/3 on each grant date anniversary). The Compensation Committee has determined that dividend equivalent amounts are accrued on unvested time-based RSUs during the vesting period as dividends are declared on the Company’s common stock. Dividends paid on the Company common stock are accrued with regard to these RSUs, deemed to be reinvested in Company common stock at the market value on the date of such dividend, and paid in additional shares on the vesting date of the underlying award in proportion to the number of shares that vest.

date):



Performance-Based RSUs At Target
Name 21
Time-Based RSUsShareholder ValueRelative TSR
Kimberly K. Ryan28,09828,09828,098




Robert M. VanHimbergen8,0098,0098,009




Ulrich Bartel5,1675,1675,167
Nicholas R. Farrell4,1984,1984,198
J. Michael Whitted4,8444,8444,844
Shareholder Value RSUs. The Shareholder Value RSUs granted in fiscal 2023 are earned based on the actual shareholder value created during the three-year period commencing October 1, 20202022 (referred to as “Shareholder Value Delivered”) above or below what was expected during that same period (referred to as “Shareholder Value Expected”), as further described in Appendix A. For the award granted in fiscal 2021, theThe amount of Shareholder Value Expected as of the end of the three-year measurement period is $4,169.5$4,819.9 million, reflecting the targeted amount of economic value at the end of the three years ending on September 30, 2023,2025, subject to certain adjustments as described below and in Appendix A.

24 The LTIC award value allocated to the time-based RSUs, Shareholder Value RSUs, and Relative TSR RSUs was converted to a number of shares at target based on the average of high and low stock price on the date of grant.

64

At the end of the three-year measurement period the Shareholder Value RSUs will vest in an amount equal to the product of (i) the target number of shares, times (ii) a multiplier based on the ratio, expressed as a percentage, of Shareholder Value Delivered to Shareholder Value Expected as follows:

follows (achievement between the points is interpolated linearly to calculate the corresponding multiplier):

Shareholder Value Delivered

As Percentage Of

Shareholder Value Expected

Multiplier
Less than 70%zero (no units earned)
At least 70% but less than 130%0.25 plus an additional 0.025 for each full percentage point achieved above minimum for range(minimum number of units earned)
100%1.00 (target number of units earned)
At least 130%1.752.00 (maximum number of units earned)




21 The LTIC award value allocated to the time-based RSUs, Shareholder Value RSUs, and Relative TSR RSUs was converted to a number of shares at target based on the average of high and low stock price on the date of grant.
64


The achievement levels and corresponding multipliers set forth above are expressed in further detail in the payout curve set forth below:

 

below.


image (18).jpg

The Compensation Committee has determined that dividend equivalent amounts are accrued on Shareholder Value RSUs during the measurement period as dividends are declared on the Company’s common stock. These equivalent amounts are deemed to be reinvested in additional shares of Company common stock and then ultimately paid in the form of additional shares when the underlying award vests, using the same multiplier as the underlying award.

Our formula for calculating the shareholder value components of these awards is a discounted cash flow model that is designed to reflect the true economic return to investors. The key inputs into the model are:


the Company’s net operating profit after tax, which is calculated by taking net income and adding back certain unusual and/or infrequent non-cash items (“NOPAT”);


free cash flow; and

65

the Company’s net operating profit after tax, which is calculated by taking net income and adding back certain unusual and/or infrequent non-cash items (“NOPAT”);
free cash flow; and


the established “hurdle rate,” which is a reflection of the Company’s enterprise-wide weighted average cost of capital and targeted capital structure (the “Hurdle Rate”).

the established “hurdle rate,” which is a reflection of the Company’s enterprise-wide weighted average cost of capital and targeted capital structure (the “Hurdle Rate”).
It is contemplated that the Hurdle Rate will typically equal or exceed the Company’s weighted average cost of capital. In general, the Shareholder Value RSUs are designed to pay on the basis of the growth in economic value to an investor over three years, and the Company must earn a return that meets the applicable Hurdle Rate in order for a Named Executive Officer to earn the targeted award. The return must exceed the Hurdle Rate to exceed the targeted award. We believe that linking the pay of our Named Executive Officers with the growth in the economic value of the Company in this way aligns the interests of the executive management team with those of the Company’s shareholders.

Calculation of Shareholder Value Expected. The amount of Shareholder Value Expected (defined in Appendix A) as of the end of a measurement period is generally calculated as (i) the Company’s Adjusted NOPAT (defined
65


(defined in Appendix A) for the prior fiscal year, (ii) divided by the Hurdle Rate, and (iii) multiplied by the cube of (1 + Hurdle Rate), with certain limited exceptions set forth in Appendix A:



Compensate.jpg
The Compensation Committee makes adjustments for divestitures during the course of the performance period of these awards. During the performance period ending with fiscal 2021,2023, the Company divested threefour businesses (Cimcool, Red(Red Valve, ABEL, TerraSource Global, and ABEL)Batesville). For these divestitures, the Compensation Committee adjusted the applicable targets to align with the respective partial ownership periods. The Company divested its TerraSource Global business in early fiscal 2022, and the Compensation Committee is similarly adjusting any awards with a performance period that would have included TerraSource Global in the Shareholder Value Expected calculation. Similarly, the Compensation Committee has also historicallyin the past adjusted award calculations to include newly-acquired businesses. But inIn order to simplify calculations of such targets and reduce the likelihood of dilutivedistortive effects on compensation, whether positive or negative, the Compensation Committee determined, beginning with awards made in fiscal 2021, not to adjust such awards for the impact of any acquisitions.

acquisitions made during the performance period.

The foregoing adjustments, along with any described in the definitions set forth in Appendix A, are not intended to be comprehensive, and the Compensation Committee retains discretion to make additional adjustments consistent with the terms of the Stock Plan and awards thereunder.

Calculation of Shareholder Value Delivered. The amount of Shareholder Value Delivered as of the end of a measurement period is calculated by adding two components: the Ending NOPAT Component and the Ending Cash Flow Component. See Appendix A for applicable definitions.

66

Relative TSR RSUs. The Relative TSR RSUs granted in fiscal 20212023 are earned based on the change in the market price of the Company’s common stock during the three-year period commencing October 1, 2020,2022, compared to the change in market price of the stock of the members of the Standard & Poor’s 400 Mid Cap Industrials index (referred to herein as the “Index Companies”) during that same period, taking dividends into account as further described below. Although consistent with last year, this is a change from earlier years, when we used our then-applicable compensation peer group to measure relative TSR. As described below, the Relative TSR RSUs that were granted in fiscal 2019 and vested in fiscal 2021 were measured in comparison to the compensation peer group, rather than the Index Companies. In either case, byBy linking the pay of our Named Executive Officers with the relative return earned by our shareholders compared to our peers, the Relative TSR RSUs create an incentive for our executive management team to produce above market returns for our shareholders.

In general for awards granted in fiscal 2019, the target award was earned if the Company’s relative TSR during the measurement period ranked between the 45th and 55th percentiles of the compensation peer group, and the award paid out proportionately higher or lower if relative TSR was above or below that range, as illustrated in more detail below. At the end of the three-year measurement period in fiscal 2021 the Relative TSR RSUs granted in fiscal 2019 vested in an amount equal to the product of (i) the target number of shares times (ii) a multiplier based on the ranking, expressed as a percentile, of the Company’s TSR within the companies in its compensation peer group as follows:

Relative Percentile Rank Of

Company TSR

Multiplier
Equal to or less than 24.99%25zero (no RSUs earned)
At least 25% up to 29.99%0.40
At least 30% up to 34.99%0.55
At least 35% up to 39.99%0.70
At least 40% up to 44.99%0.85
At least 45% up to 54.99%1.00
At least 55% up to 59.99%1.15
At least 60% up to 64.99%1.30
At least 65% up to 69.99%1.45
At least 70% up to 74.99%1.60
At least 75%1.75

Whereas dividends accrue during the measurement period with respect to shares underlying the Shareholder Value RSUs as described above, the Compensation Committee has determined that dividends do not accrue during the measurement period with respect to shares underlying Relative TSR RSUs, and as a result the determination of the grant date value of the Relative TSR RSUs assumes no dividends are paid on these shares.

Beginning with

For the awards made in fiscal 20202023 and vesting inat the end of fiscal 2022,2025, the Compensation Committee modified theused a payout formula described above for Relative TSR RSUs to providethat provides a 25 percent of target minimum payout for achievement at 25 percent achievement,the 25th percentile, 100 percent of target payout at 50 percent50th percentile achievement, and 175200 percent of target payout at 75 percent75th percentile achievement and above. Performance below the 25th percentile earns a zero payout. The formula uses linear interpolation for payouts between these markers, rather than the “banded” approach we have historically used. Thus,25th and 75th percentiles, and the Company’s relative TSR must be achieved at median to receive the target payout going forward.

payout.
66

25 Actual vesting level for Relative TSR RSUs awarded in fiscal 2019.


67

The key inputs and award calculation formula for these Relative TSR RSU awards are the Beginning Average Price and Ending Average Price of the stock of the Company and the Company’s compensation peer group companies or Index Companies, as applicable; the Dividend Reinvestment Multiplier applicable to each such company; and the TSR of each such company during the measurement period. Definitions of these terms are set forth in Appendix A. The TSR of the Company and each of its compensation peer group companies or the Index Companies during the measurement period is calculated by subtracting one from the quotient of (i) the Ending Average Price for that company, divided by (ii) the Beginning Average Price for that company, as shown below:


below.

Compensate 2.jpg
Vesting of Fiscal 20192021 LTIC Awards. On September 30, 2021,2023, the three-year measurement period for the Company’s LTIC awards that were granted in fiscal 20192021 closed. Those awards vested in accordance with our two performance-based LTIC award formulas described above. During the three-year measurement period (fiscal years 2019-2021)2021-2023), the Company achieved an actual shareholder value increase equal to 129130 percent of the target for that measurement period, resulting in a vested award amount equal to 173175 percent of the targeted number of shares (i.e., the number of shares that would be earned upon achievement in full of the target shareholder value increase).

Under the relative TSR formula, at the end of the three-year measurement period, the Company ranked 15 outat the 46th percentile of the 18 companies in the Company’s compensation peer groupIndex Companies constituted as of the date of the award, (as described above, the percentile calculation includes the 17 peer group companies plus the Company), resulting in a percentile figurepayout at 89 percent of 17.6 percent, and, therefore, no payout.

target.

Additional details regarding the LTIC awards granted in fiscal 20192021 are set forth under the heading “Long-Term Incentive Compensation” in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of our proxy statement for our 20202022 Annual Meeting of shareholders that was filed with the SEC on January 2, 2020.December 30, 2021. See the “Option Exercises and Stock Vested for Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2021”2023” table in Part III below for additional detail regarding the vesting of the LTIC awards granted in fiscal 2019.

Non-recurring 2021.

Time-Based RSU AwardsRSUs. The grants of annual time-based RSUs awarded in Fiscal 2021. In fiscal 2021, consistent with its historical use of time-based RSU awards as a retention tool for certain key executives,2023 vest ratably on the Compensation Committee approved the granting of certain non-recurring time-based RSU retention awards. The first, of these was made to J. Michael Whitted, Senior Vice President, Strategysecond, and Corporate Developmentthird anniversaries of the Company, who was instrumental in the Company’s acquisition of Milacron and recent strategic divestitures and whose organization supports one of our key strategic pillars, that is, growth through acquisitions. In making this award, the Compensation Committee determined that in a time of broader market uncertainty related to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic in fiscal 2021, senior executive departures could have a significantly negative impactgrant date (one-third on business results.each grant date anniversary). The Compensation Committee also considered Mr. Whitted’s skills and experience, sustained high performance, and long tenure athas determined that dividend equivalent amounts are accrued on unvested time-based RSUs during the Company in making this award,vesting period as well as his overall compensation package relative to the extremely competitive market.

68

The Compensation Committee considered similar factors in connection with the CEO transition and potential impactdividends are declared on the Company’s operations, where senior executive departures could have a similarly negative impact. As a result,common stock. Dividends paid on the Compensation Committee also approved non-recurring time-based RSU awardsCompany common stock are accrued and deemed to Christopher H. Trainor, Senior Vice President and President of Batesville, and to Kristina A. Cerniglia, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, as part of their retention and likewise recognizing their skills and experience, sustained high performance, and long tenuresbe reinvested in Company common stock at the Company, withmarket value on the aimdate of facilitating a successful transition for our new CEO.

Consequently, Mr. Whitted received ansuch dividend, and paid in additional shares on the vesting date of the underlying award in proportion to the number of 50,859 time-based RSUs, with a total grant date value of approximately $2,100,000, vesting one-third on each of June 18, 2022, June 18, 2023, and June 18, 2024, subject in each case to his continued employment. Mr. Trainor’s award of 60,644 time-based RSUs, with a total grant date value of approximately $2,625,000, vests 20 percent on each of July 6, 2023, July 6, 2024, and July 6, 2025, and 40 percent on July 6, 2026, subject in each case to his continued employment and to acceleration in full in the event of his termination by the Company without cause. Ms. Cerniglia’s award consisted of 33,775 time-based RSUs, with a total grant date value of approximately $1,400,000, vesting 50 percent each on July 1, 2023 and July 1, 2024, subject in each case to her continued employment. See the “Outstanding Equity Awards at September 30, 2021” table in Part III below for additional detail regarding these executives’ LTIC awards granted in fiscal 2021.

shares that vest.

Retirement and Savings Plans

Savings Plan. We maintain a tax-qualified defined contribution savings plan (the “Savings Plan”) in which most of our U.S.-domiciled employees (excluding employees added in connection with the acquisitions of LINXIS and the Schenck Process Food and Performance Materials Business), including all of the Named Executive Officers other than Mr. Bartel, are eligible to participate. The employees participating in the Savings Plan may contribute a percentage of their compensation thereto
67


on a pre-tax or Roth after-tax basis, subject to applicable limits.  For the Savings Plan, the Company matches contributions for all eligible employees, not accruing legacy pension benefits, which includes all of the Named Executive Officers.Officers other than Mr. Bartel.  Additionally, whether or not employees eligible to contribute to the Savings Plan did so, the Company provided an automatic contribution per pay period to the Savings Plan. All contributions by employees and the automatic Company contribution are fully vested immediately, but the Company matching contributions havedid not historically vestedvest until after three years of credited service, at which point further Company matching contributions vestvested immediately when made. In addition, an employee’s actual annual cash bonus amount was historically excluded as compensation from the contribution formula under the plan. Beginning in 2021, all contributions, including Company matching contributions, vested immediately when made, and actual annual cash bonus amount began to be included as compensation (in addition to base salary) for calculating contributions.

For information regarding compensation paid to our Named Executive Officers under the Savings Plan, see footnote 5 to the “Summary Compensation Table” in Part III below.

69

Supplemental Retirement Plan. We maintain a Supplemental Retirement Plan administered by Fidelity Management Trust Company (the “SRP”) that provides a defined contribution benefit to plan participants. All of the Named Executive Officers other than Mr. Bartel (who is not a U.S.-domiciled employee) participate in the SRP. The SRP is designed to supplement the amount of retirement benefits that participants are entitled to receive from our Savings Plan.

The Internal Revenue Code establishes certain limits with respect to tax-qualified retirement plans like our Savings Plan, including a limit on the maximum amount of compensation that can be counted as earnings of the participant for purposes of calculating benefits. The application of these tax law limits can reduce the amount that would otherwise be payable to a participant under the terms of a tax-qualified retirement plan. Additionally, historically our Savings Plan excluded any cash bonus amounts from the definition of compensation for plan purposes, focusing the contribution formula only on base salary. Beginning in 2021, the contribution formula also took cash bonus amounts into account.

In general, the SRP is designed to “make whole” a participant by paying benefits otherwise lost under the Savings Plan due to the application of tax law limits and the historical exclusion of the annual cash bonus from the plan’s contribution formula. The SRP annually accruedaccrues future benefits for the participants equal to the difference between (i) the benefit amount that is actually contributed for a participant under the Savings Plan, and (ii) the amount that would have been contributed if (a) the tax law limits were not applied, and (b) the participant’s actual annual cash bonus amount were included as compensation (in addition to base salary) in the historical contribution formula under the plan. Beginning in 2021, the SRP now annually accrues future benefits equal to the difference between the benefit amount actually contributed to the Savings Plan and the amount that would have been contributed if the tax law limits were not applied.

Once benefits under the SRP have vested, they are generally payable following retirement or termination of employment. However, if a participant’s employment is terminated for “cause” (as such term is defined in the SRP), contributions under the SRP may be forfeited.

Under the SRP, participants are permitted to direct the investment of their accrued accounts (on a hypothetical basis because this is non-cash “shadow” deferred compensation) into various Fidelity mutual funds and/or Company common stock.funds.  The Company then actually makes those designated investments for the Company’s own account with funds contributed by the Company under a “Rabbi Trust” arrangement so that the Company can actually fund the earnings or losses experienced by each participant in his or her hypothetical investments when distributions are made.arrangement. The SRP also permits a participant, when permitted by Section 409A of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code, to elect to defer all or a portion of his or her annual cash bonus for payment at a later time and to invest the deferred amounts in Fidelity mutual funds and/or Company common stock on a hypothetical basis. This deferral was not made available during 2020 or 2021 due to the Milacron acquisition in 2020 and to the use of two six-month performance periods in 2021, each of which impacted the timing of the Company’s target-setting process.

For information concerning benefits payable to our Named Executive Officers under the SRP, see the table entitled “Nonqualified Deferred Compensation for Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2021”2023” in Part III below.

None of our U.S. Named Executive Officers participates in or has account balances in any non-qualified defined benefit plan sponsored by us.

70
68




Mr. Bartel is domiciled in Germany and, like all of our employees domiciled outside the U.S., is not eligible to participate in the SRP or Savings Plan. Mr. Bartel does have a vested account balance in a Coperion-sponsored pension, but Coperion contributions to the pension stopped in 2009.

Employment Agreements and Termination Benefits

Employment Agreements. We have entered into employment agreements with each of our Named Executive Officers. We believe that it is appropriate for our senior executives to have employment agreements because they provide the Company certain contractual protections that we might not otherwise have, including provisions relating to not competing with us, not soliciting our employees, and maintaining the confidentiality of our proprietary information. The employment agreements we have with our Named Executive Officers contain non-competition and non-solicitation agreements that generally continue in effect for a period of one to two years after the termination of the Named Executive Officer’s employment. Additionally, we believe that employment agreements are a useful tool in the recruiting and retention of senior-level executives. The employment agreements are substantially similar among our Named Executive Officers.

Officers other than as described for our Chief Executive Officer, and differences in the employment agreement of Ulrich Bartel due to German law and local market practices that are described in more detail below.

Termination Benefits Under Employment Agreements with Named Executive Officers Based in the United States. The employment agreements with our U.S. Named Executive Officers provide for employment “at will.” They are terminable by the Named Executive Officer without “cause” or without “good reason” on 60 days’ written notice, by the Company at any time without “cause,” and also by the Company at any time (subject to certain cure rights) for “cause,” as such term is defined in each employment agreement. These Named Executive Officers are also entitled to terminate their employment agreements for “good reason,” as such term is defined in their agreements. If we terminate the employment of a Named Executive Officer without “cause,” or if his or her employment is terminated with “good reason,” then we are obligated to provide severance compensation in connection with such termination. No severance compensation is payable under our employment agreements with our Named Executive Officers if we terminate with “cause,” if the executive terminates without “good reason,” or if the employment relationship is terminated on account of death or disability. As previously reported, Ms. Ryan entered into a new employment agreement effective upon becoming President and CEO. Thus, although the terms of her employment agreement during the fiscal year were consistent with those of other Named Executive Officers, her current employment agreement contains terms described as applying to the CEO.

If the employment of a U.S. Named Executive Officer is terminated by usthe Company without cause or is terminated by the executive officer upon the occurrence, without the executive officer’s consent, of a good reason event, we are required under the officer’s employment agreement to provide severance compensation to such Named Executive Officer as follows:


continuation of the officer’s base salary for 12 months (24 months for the CEO), subject to required tax withholdings, which payments may need to be delayed for six months under certain provisions of the Internal Revenue Code;


continued health coverage and, in some cases, group life insurance, until the continuation of base salary period described above is complete; and


limited out-placement counseling.

continuation of the officer’s base salary for 12 months (24 months for the CEO), subject to required tax withholdings, which payments may need to be delayed for six months under certain provisions of the Internal Revenue Code;
continued health coverage and, in some cases, group life insurance, until the continuation of base salary period described above is complete; and
limited out-placement counseling.
Termination Benefits Under Employment Agreement with Ulrich Bartel (the “Bartel Agreement”). Because Mr. Bartel is domiciled in Germany and employed by the Company’s German
69


affiliate, Hillenbrand Germany Holding GmbH, his agreement and termination benefits are based in German law and are generally comparable to those provided to our other German employees and differ from those in the employment agreements with our U.S. Named Executive Officers.

The Bartel Agreement is terminable by Mr. Bartel or our German affiliate without “cause” (as defined by his agreement) upon twelve months’ written notice or a longer period if required in certain cases under German law. Following delivery of such a termination notice by either party, Mr. Bartel must continue to work for the Company during this 12-month “notice period” and is entitled to his normal compensation, including the full amount of any STIC award attributable to the notice period. However, our German affiliate may elect to instead release Mr. Bartel from his duty to work for the Company during his notice period, placing him on “garden leave,” in which case his agreement entitles him to his normal base salary plus any STIC award attributable to that period. During a garden leave period, Mr. Bartel remains bound to other obligations stipulated in his employment agreement, including loyalty and non-competition obligations. Pursuant to the Bartel Agreement, no additional severance compensation is payable to Mr. Bartel following the end of his notice period, whether or not a garden leave is elected. If Mr. Bartel’s employment is terminated on account of death, the Bartel Agreement requires the Company to continue to pay his base salary to his surviving dependents for a period of three months.

Post-Termination Payments of STIC and LTIC. A Named Executive Officer whose employment terminates may or may not be entitled to the post-termination payment of all or a pro rata portion of the STIC or LTIC award that would have been payable to the Named Executive Officer if his or her employment had continued through the end of the applicable measurement period. The amount payable, if any, depends on the performance of the Company or its applicable business unit throughout the measurement period in question and the circumstances under which employment terminates.

71

STIC. Post-termination STIC is payable to a Named Executive Officer after the performance period in question has ended and only if it is determined under the applicable performance formula that an amount would have been payable to the former officer had his or her employment continued through the end of the performance period. The amount, if any, that is payable depends upon the circumstances of the termination.

If employment terminates due to death, disability, retirement (after age 55 and five years of service), involuntary termination without “cause,” or voluntary termination for “good reason,” then the former officer is entitled to a pro-ratapro rata payment of his or her STIC award based on the portion of the fiscal year during which he or she remained employed, subject to a reduction of up to one-third of that amount at the discretion of the Compensation Committee.26 No pro-ratapro rata STIC is payable to officers upon an involuntary termination with cause or a voluntary termination without good reason.

LTIC. Following termination, the performance-based portion of an LTIC award is payable to a Named Executive Officer only after the measurement period in question has ended and only if it is determined under the applicable performance formula that an amount would have been payable to the former officer had his or her employment continued through the end of the measurement period. Once the amount that would have been paid had employment continued (the “Full Period Award”) is determined, if employment terminates due to death, disability, or retirement (after age 55 and five years of service), involuntarily without cause, or voluntarily for “good reason,” the Named Executive Officer is entitled to a pro-ratapro rata amount of the Full Period Award based on the portion of the
70


measurement period during which he or she remained employed, and in any other circumstance, all outstanding performance-based RSUs are forfeited upon termination of employment.

Following termination, any unvested portion of a Named Executive Officer’s annual time-based RSUs are forfeited except as follows:


if employment terminates due to death or disability after one year and one day following the grant date, all unvested shares shall become vested shares; and


if employment terminates due to retirement (as defined above), voluntarily by the executive for “good reason” pursuant to an employment agreement, or, beginning in fiscal 2022, involuntarily by the Company without cause, the Named Executive Officer will receive prorated vesting.

if employment terminates due to death or disability after one year and one day following the grant date, all unvested shares shall become vested shares; and
if employment terminates due to retirement (as defined above), voluntarily by the executive for “good reason” pursuant to an employment agreement, or, beginning with awards granted in fiscal 2022, involuntarily by the Company without cause, the Named Executive Officer will receive prorated vesting.
In any other circumstance, all unvested shares of time-based RSUs are forfeited upon termination of employment. Any difference in treatment of one-off and retention awards is governed by the applicable award agreement.

26 Beginning in fiscal 2022, the Restated STIC Plan no longer limits the Compensation Committee’s discretion for such reductions to one-third.

72

For both performance- and time-based RSUs, vesting upon a change in control is governed by the terms of the Stock Plan and any applicable change in control agreement, as discussed further below.

For more information regarding the severance benefits payable to our Named Executive Officers under their employment agreements and our STIC and LTIC compensation programs, see the tables under the heading “Potential Payments Upon Termination” in Part III below.

Change in Control Agreements. We believe it is important that management be in a position to provide an objective assessment and advice to the Company’s Board of Directors regarding any proposed business transaction without being unduly distracted by the uncertainties and risks that a proposed change in control of the Company creates with respect to management. Accordingly, in fiscal 2021 in connection with shareholder approval of our Stock Plan, and to reflect market practice in this area, we entered into updatedhave change in control agreements with each of our Named Executive Officers and other key executives that provide compensation to the executive if his or her employment is terminated in connection with a change in the control of the Company. The compensation provided under these agreements is similar to the prior change in control agreements and is paid only upon an executive’s termination of employment. Such compensation is in lieu of severance compensation provided under that executive’s employment agreement. The Board of Directors considered input from the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant and ultimately approved the updated change in control agreements to bring them into closer alignment with market practice. Such updates included the elimination of retirement contributions that would have been made during the severance period, the addition of the STIC-related payments described below, and the acceleration of LTIC awards based on the greater of actual or target performance.

These change in control agreements provide for payment of benefits only upon a termination of employment in anticipation of or within two years after the occurrence of a change in control (a “double trigger”), but excluding terminations on account of death or disability or for “cause” or by the executive forwithout good reason (a “Qualified Termination”). These change in control agreements expressly supersede the Company’s Stock Plan, which provides for single-trigger vesting of equity awards.

Under the change in control agreements, the benefits to be provided upon a Qualified Termination include:


a lump sum payment in cash equal to two times the executive’s annual base salary and two times target short-term incentive compensation (“STIC”) (three times for the CEO);


a lump sum payment in cash equal to two times the executive’s annual base salary and two times target STIC (three times for the CEO);
71


continued health insurance for the executive and his or her dependents for 24 months (36 months for the CEO), with the right to purchase continued medical insurance (at COBRA rates) from the end of this period until the executive reaches Social Security retirement age;


a lump sum payment equal to his or her respective pro rata current year STIC award, assuming the greater of target or actual achievement in that year of the relevant performance targets under the STIC Plan, prorated through the date of termination of employment; and

73


immediate vesting of all outstanding stock options and equity awards, assuming (where applicable) (1) the greater of target or actual achievement of the relevant performance goals for such awards made after February 11, 2021, and (2) target achievement of the relevant performance goals for such awards made prior to February 11, 2021.

As with the employment agreements, items above described as applyingright to purchase continued medical insurance (at COBRA rates) from the CEO now applyend of this period until the executive reaches Social Security retirement age;

a lump sum payment equal to Ms. Ryanhis or her respective pro rata current year STIC award, assuming the greater of target or actual achievement in that year of the relevant performance targets under her new change in control agreement entered into in connection with her becoming CEO, but did not apply during the fiscal year. STIC Plan, prorated through the date of termination of employment; and
immediate vesting of all outstanding stock options and equity awards, assuming (where applicable) (i) the greater of target or actual achievement of the relevant performance goals for such awards made after February 11, 2021, and (ii) target achievement of the relevant performance goals for such awards made prior to February 11, 2021.
These rights and benefits are subject to certain customary non-competition obligations and are contingent upon the execution of a release. In addition, the rights and benefits provided in the change in control agreements are not subject to tax gross-ups. If an executive is entitled to receive payments upon a change in control that may be subject to the excise tax, he or she will either be paid the full amount (and remain personally liable for the excise tax) or be paid a reduced amount that does not give rise to the excise tax, whichever is greater on an after-tax basis.

Under the change in control agreements, a “change in control” is defined in conformance with the Stock Plan as: (i) the acquisition of beneficial ownership of 35 percent or more of the voting power of all of the Company’s voting securities by a person or group; (ii) the consummation of certain mergers or consolidations; (iii) a change in the composition of a majority of the members of the Company’s Board of Directors; (iv) the consummation of a sale of substantially all of the Company’s assets (i.e., 50 percent or more of the assets) in one or a series of transactions within any period of 12 consecutive months; or (v) the approval by the Company’s shareholders of a plan of complete liquidation of the Company.

The amounts potentially payable to our Named Executive Officers in connection with a change in control are set forth in the tables under the headings “Potential Payments Upon Termination” and “Change in Control Benefits” in Part III below.

Other Personal Benefits

In addition to the compensation components discussed above, we also provide our U.S.-based Named Executive Officers, as well as certain other U.S.-based employees and officers, with other benefits as described below. We generally disfavor providing extensive perquisites but do provide modest benefits intended to enhance the effectiveness of our Named Executive Officers and complement the highly variable, performance-oriented compensation components we utilize. We also provide these benefits in order to remain competitive with the market and believe that these benefits help us to attract and retain qualified executives.

Executive Financial Planning, Estate Planning, and Tax Preparation Service Program. Our U.S. Named Executive Officers and certain other officers are eligible for limited reimbursement of (i) financial and estate planning services and (ii) income tax preparation services. Reimbursement is approved for up to $5,000 per calendar year.

72


Executive Physical. We provide our U.S.-based Named Executive Officers and certain other officers with the opportunity to receive executive annual physicals. We cover 100 percent of the cost of this program for officers who see the Company’s selected provider or reimburse an equivalent amount for any officer who selects his or her own provider. This program was developed to promote the physical well-being and health of our senior-level managers. We believe that this program is in the best long-term interests of our shareholders.

74 Certain of our Germany-based employees, including Mr. Bartel, are also eligible for a company-paid annual executive physical.

Other Benefits. Our Named Executive Officers also participate in other benefit plans that we fully or partially subsidize. Their participation is generally on the same terms as other employees. Some of the more significant of these benefits include medical, dental, life, disability, and vision insurance, as well as relocation reimbursement, tuition reimbursement, and holiday and vacation benefits. Many employees, including all of our U.S.-based Named Executive Officers, participate in our group term life insurance program, which provides death benefit coverage of up to twoone and one-half times base salary or $500,000, whichever is less. In addition, our U.S. Named Executive Officers and certain other employees are eligible to participate in our optional supplemental group term life insurance program, in which participants may purchase additional term life insurance at their own expense in amounts up to the lesser of five times base annual salary or $600,000. Furthermore, in certain cases, our U.S. Named Executive Officers may receive supplemental long-term disability premiums paid by the Company and other modest personal benefits as set forth in the footnotes to the Summary Compensation Table below.

Compensation-Related Policies

In connection with the Company’s compensation program, we have established certain policies that relate to executive compensation. The most significant of these policies are described below.

Stock Ownership Requirement. All of our Named Executive Officers, as well as certain other officers, are required to own a significant number of shares of Company common stock. Specifically, the officers identified below, from and after the fifth anniversary of the date on which such individual first became such an officer, or, in the case of a promotion, from and after the third anniversary of becoming subject to a higher Required Ownership Level, are required to hold shares of our common stock or equivalents (as further described below) with a minimum aggregate value at the following levels (“Required Ownership Level”):

Position
PositionRequired Ownership Level
Chief Executive Officer of the Company5 x Base Annual Salary
Senior Vice Presidents of the Company2 x Base Annual Salary
Certain senior officers of the Company and its subsidiaries as designated by the Company Chief Executive Officer from time to time1 x Base Annual Salary

Each of our Named Executive Officers currently holds shares of our common stock or stock equivalents at levels greater than or equal to the Required Ownership Level or, in the case of Ms. Ryan, is under the applicable three-year grace period.Level. Shares owned outright and shares represented by RSUs or restricted stock awards, whether vested or unvested, excluding
73


performance-based shares, count as share equivalents toward the Required Ownership Level. Unexercised stock options do not count toward the Required Ownership Level. Historically, the Company excluded unexercised stock options from the Required Ownership Level and, beginning in 2021, now also excludes performance-based RSUs.

Failure to achieve or maintain the Required Ownership Level may result in (i) the applicable individual being required to hold all after-tax vested stock award shares and after-tax shares acquired upon exercise of stock options, or (ii) suspension of future equity awards, until the Required Ownership Level is achieved. The Compensation Committee (or its designee) may make exceptions, in its sole discretion, in the event of disability or great financial hardship.

75

Anti-Hedging Policyand Anti-Pledging Policies. For a discussion of the Company’s anti-hedging policy,and anti-pledging policies, see Part VII of this proxy statement.

Clawback. For STIC and LTIC awards, In 2023, the Company has adopted a revised “clawback” policy applicable to executive officers. Specifically, officers, consistent with the final rules promulgated by the SEC and NYSE under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010. Under the revised policy, the Compensation Committee is required to pursue recoupment of certain “erroneously awarded” compensation from the executive officers of the Company under the following circumstances:

if the Company is required becauseto make an accounting restatement due to the material noncompliance of fraud or negligence, to restatethe Company with any financial results for any period (the “Restatement Period”) in a manner thatreporting requirement under the securities laws; and

if such noncompliance would have adversely affected the amount of the payout of any STIC or LTIC awards, the Compensation Committee has the rightincentive-based compensation paid during the three-year period following the Restatement Period to review the matter and determine what, if any, repayment executives will be required to submit.

Tax Deduction Management. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which was enacted on December 22, 2017, included several significant changes to the Internal Revenue Code, such as the repeal of the performance-based compensation exemption and the expansion of the individuals subject to the provision (for example, by including the Chief Financial Officer and certain former Named Executive Officers). Because of these changes, except as otherwise provided in the transition relief provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, compensation paid to any of our Named Executive Officers generally will not be deductible to the extent that it exceeds $1.0 million. Compensation from certain stock options awardedthree completed fiscal years prior to the effectiveness ofdate the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act may still be deductible.

Company is required to prepare such a restatement.

76
74


PART II: COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

Each member of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Hillenbrand, Inc. is “independent,” as that term is defined under (i) the New York Stock Exchange listing standards, (ii) the non-employee director standards of Rule 16b-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (iii) the outside director requirements of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, and (iv)(iii) the Company’s Corporate Governance Standards. The Compensation Committee currently consists of Gary L. Collar, Helen W. Cornell, F. Joseph Loughrey, Dennis W. Pullin, Jennifer W. Rumsey, and Stuart A. Taylor, II.

As a committee, one of our obligations is to ensure Hillenbrand’s executive compensation program is performance-based, in order to align management interests with the short-term and long-term interests of shareholders, and is competitive, in order to enable the Company to attract and retain superior executive personnel. We engage an independent executive compensation consulting firm to assist us in our review of the Company’s executive compensation programs to ensure these programs are competitive and consistent with our stated objectives. The executive compensation consultant is retained by and directly accountable to us, and we generally approve all related fees paid to the executive compensation consultant. We have no interlocks or insider participation, and we engage in annual self-evaluations to determine our effectiveness as a committee. We have adopted a Charter, which may be found on Hillenbrand’s web site at www.hillenbrand.com.

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis contained in this proxy statement with management and, based upon this review and discussion, recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement and in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2021.

2023.
Respectfully submitted,
Respectfully submitted,
Helen W. Cornell (Chairperson)
Gary L. Collar (Chairperson)
F. Joseph LoughreyHelen W. Cornell
Dennis W. Pullin
Jennifer W. Rumsey
Stuart A. Taylor, II

77
75


PART III: EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES

Tabular Compensation Information

In the following pages we present numerous tables that set out various elements of compensation for our Named Executive Officers. No one table alone presents the “total picture”; instead, you should review all the information carefully to understand the amounts and manner in which our Named Executive Officers have been paid. To understand all the numbers in the tables below, you need to carefully read the footnotes, which explain various assumptions and calculations that give rise to the dollar amounts in the tables.

Compensation of Named Executive Officers

Summary Compensation Table

The following table summarizes the total compensation paid to or earned by each of the Named Executive Officers for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2021, 2020,2023, 2022, and 2019,2021, except where otherwise noted. We have entered into employment agreements with each of the Named Executive Officers, which are described in detail in the “Employment Agreements and Termination Benefits” section of Part I above.

(a) (b)  (c)  (d)  (e)  (f)  (g)  (h)  (i)  (j) 
                    Change In       
                    Pension Value       
                    And       
                    Nonqualified       
                 Non-Equity  Deferred       
           Stock  Option  Incentive Plan  Compensation  All Other    
Name And Principal    Salary  Bonus  Awards  Awards  Compensation  Earnings  Compensation  Total 
Position                           
(As Of September 30, 2021) Year  $(1)  $  $(2)  $(3)  $(4)  $  $(5)  $ 
                                    
Joe A. Raver 2021  $868,425  $  $3,999,942  $  $1,713,700  $  $115,396  $6,697,463 
President and Chief                                   
Executive Officer (6) 2020  $723,197  $  $2,417,254  $1,199,999  $663,800  $  $47,779  $5,052,029 
                                    
  2019  $844,178  $  $2,233,248  $1,116,640  $1,250,897  $  $17,765  $5,462,728 
                                    
Kristina A. Cerniglia 2021  $561,806  $  $2,449,920  $  $694,800  $  $59,968  $3,766,494 
Senior Vice President                                   
and Chief Financial 2020  $538,395  $  $637,867  $316,663  $370,000  $  $64,275  $1,927,200 
Officer                                   
  2019  $535,346  $  $549,946  $274,991  $567,904  $  $78,065  $2,006,252 
                                    
Kimberly K. Ryan 2021  $566,913  $  $949,968  $  $672,400  $  $343,945  $2,533,226 
Executive Vice                                   
President (6) 2020  $501,496  $  $570,696  $283,329  $368,600  $  $465,540  $2,189,661 
                                    
  2019  $498,644  $  $466,613  $233,327  $550,569  $  $2,023,261  $3,772,414 
                                    
Christopher H. Trainor 2021  $474,792  $  $3,324,939  $  $621,200  $  $47,341  $4,468,272 
Senior Vice President                                   
and President of 2020  $450,895  $  $402,833  $199,998  $539,400  $  $58,186  $1,651,312 
Batesville                                   
  2019  $447,834  $  $399,972  $199,991  $252,975  $  $58,665  $1,359,437 
                                    
J. Michael Whitted 2021  $435,963  $  $2,799,931  $  $539,600  $  $53,623  $3,829,117 
Senior Vice President                                   
Strategy and 2020  $425,000  $  $470,004  $233,332  $265,500  $  $53,586  $1,447,422 
Corporate                                   
Development 2019  $425,000  $  $466,613  $233,327  $450,824  $  $57,653  $1,633,417 

(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)(g)(h)(i)(j)
Name And Principal
Position
(As of September 30, 2023)
SalaryBonusStock Awards
Option
Awards
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
Change In
Pension
Value And
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
All Other
Compensation
Total
Year$ (1)$$ (2)$$ (3)$$ (4)$
Kimberly K. Ryan
President and Chief
Executive Officer
2023$917,808 $— $5,100,067 $— $416,250 $— $134,755 $6,568,880 
2022$786,356 $— $3,220,167 $— $1,044,844 $— $169,691 $5,221,058 
2021$566,913 $— $1,034,272 $— $672,400 $— $343,945 $2,617,530 
Robert M. VanHimbergen (5)
Senior Vice President
and Chief Financial
Officer
2023$525,986 $— $1,453,713 $— $163,487 $— $59,838 $2,203,024 
2022$273,973 $— $4,034,836 $— $254,847 $— $44,755 $4,608,411 
2021$ N/A$ N/A$ N/A$ N/A$ N/A$ N/A$ N/A$ N/A


Ulrich Bartel (5)
Senior Vice President and President, Coperion and Advanced Process Solutions
2023$455,218 $— $937,862 $— $142,607 $— $19,883 $1,555,570 
2022$ N/A$ N/A$ N/A$— $ N/A$— $ N/A$ N/A
2021$ N/A$ N/A$ N/A$— $ N/A$— $ N/A$ N/A


Nicholas R. Farrell (5)
Senior Vice President,
General Counsel and
Secretary
2023$534,368 $— $761,979 $— $177,133 $— $69,517 $1,542,997 
2022$511,096 $— $2,443,902 $— $472,915 $— $46,308 $3,474,221 
2021$ N/A$ N/A$ N/A$ N/A$ N/A$ N/A$ N/A$ N/A
J. Michael Whitted
  Senior Vice President,
  Strategy and Corporate
  Development
2023$473,519 $— $879,235 $— $168,143 $— $65,733 $1,586,630 
2022$449,658 $— $751,282 $— $445,786 $— $54,119 $1,700,845 
2021$435,963 $— $2,862,049 $— $539,600 $— $53,623 $3,891,235 
76

(1)The amounts indicated represent the dollar value of base salary earned during fiscal years 2021, 2020, and 2019, as applicable.


78

(1)The amounts indicated represent the dollar value of base salary earned during fiscal years 2023, 2022, and 2021, as applicable. Named Executive Officers who worked less than the
full fiscal year, including Mr. VanHimbergen in 2022, were paid a pro rata salary reflecting days worked during the year. The amounts indicated for Ms. Ryan reflect her transition to President and CEO during fiscal 2022 and the accompanying changes in compensation.
(2)The amounts indicated represent the grant date fair value related to awards of restricted stock units granted during fiscal years 2023, 2022, and 2021, computed in accordance with stock-based accounting rules (FASB ASC Topic 718). The determination of this value is based on the methodology set forth in Note 11 to our audited financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, which was filed with the SEC on November 15, 2023. Awards that are performance-based are valued for purposes of this table above based on the targeted 100 percent performance achievement level. The maximum award amounts when the grants were made, at the highest possible performance achievement level, were 175 percent of the values shown in the table for grants made in fiscal years 2022 and 2021, and 200 percent for grants made in fiscal year 2023. The amounts indicated include one-time awards, including the previously disclosed sign-on and retention awards in 2022 for Mr. VanHimbergen and Mr. Farrell respectively.
(3)The amounts indicated represent cash awards earned for fiscal years 2023, 2022, and 2021, and paid in the first quarter of fiscal 2024, 2023, and 2022, respectively, under our STIC Plan. Named Executive Officers who worked less than the full fiscal year, including Mr. VanHimbergen in 2022, were paid a pro rata cash award for the year.
(4)Includes, where applicable for fiscal 2023 as set forth in the table below this note, (a) Company contributions to the Savings Plan and the SRP, (b) tax reimbursements received, and (c) other personal benefits (which are itemized and further described in the table below this note).
(5)Mr. VanHimbergen, Mr. Bartel, and Mr. Farrell were not Named Executive Officers in 2021, and Mr. Bartel was not a Named Executive Officer in 2022.
77


(2)The amounts indicated represent the grant date fair value related to awards of restricted stock units granted during fiscal years 2021, 2020, and 2019, computed in accordance with stock-based accounting rules (FASB ASC Topic 718). The determination of this value is based on the methodology set forth in Note 10 to our audited financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, which was filed with the SEC on November 17, 2021. Awards that are performance-based are valued for purposes of this table above based on the targeted 100 percent performance achievement level. The maximum award amounts when the grants were made, at the highest possible performance achievement level, were 175 percent of the values shown in the table.


(3)The amounts indicated represent the grant date fair value related to stock option awards granted during fiscal years 2020 and 2019, computed in accordance with stock-based accounting rules (FASB ASC Topic 718). The determination of this value is based on the methodology set forth in Note 10 to our audited financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, which was filed with the SEC on November 17, 2021.


(4)The amounts indicated represent cash awards earned for fiscal years 2021, 2020, and 2019, and paid in the first quarter of fiscal 2022, 2021, and 2020, respectively, under our STIC Plan. See the “Annual Cash Incentive Awards” section of Part I above.


(5)Includes, where applicable for fiscal 2021 as set forth in the table below this note, (a) Company contributions to the Savings Plan and the SRP, (b) tax gross-ups and reimbursements received, and (c) other personal benefits (which are itemized and further described in the table below this note).


79

Other Compensation – Additional Detail (Fiscal Year 2021)

  Company Contribution    
Name 401(K) Supp 401(K) Tax Reimbursements And Gross-Ups Additional Personal Benefits Aggregating $10,000 Or More
                 
Joe A. Raver $17,400  $87,979  $10,017* $ 
Kristina A. Cerniglia $17,400  $42,568  $  $ 
Kimberly K. Ryan $17,198  $42,794  $272,794* $11,159**
Christopher H. Trainor $14,726  $32,615  $  $ 
J. Michael Whitted $13,459  $29,669  $  $10,495***


*Under the Company’s expatriation policies, the Company paid certain of Mr. Raver’s and Ms. Ryan’s foreign taxes. For Mr. Raver, the amount reported in this column reflects reimbursements made by the Company to Mr. Raver for correction of a foreign tax gross-up paid by the Company on Mr. Raver’s behalf during fiscal 2017 and relates to his work conducted on behalf of the Company while residing in Switzerland. Mr. Raver completed this work and returned to the United States in 2013. For Ms. Ryan, the amount reported in this column reflects foreign tax payments made by the Company during fiscal 2021 on Ms. Ryan’s behalf that relate to her work conducted on behalf of the Company while residing in Germany.


**The personal benefits amount reported for Ms. Ryan in the table above is attributed to payments made by the Company in fiscal 2021 for calendar year 2021 financial planning and tax preparation ($5,000), calendar year 2020 financial planning and tax preparation ($1,851), and long-term disability insurance premiums ($4,308).


***The personal benefits amount reported for Mr. Whitted in the table above is attributed to payments made by the Company in fiscal 2021 for calendar year 2021 financial planning and tax preparation ($1,834), calendar year 2020 financial planning and tax preparation ($5,000), and long-term disability insurance premiums ($3,661).


(6)This Summary Compensation Table shows titles as of September 30, 2021. As announced, at the end of calendar year 2021, Joe A. Raver, the Company’s prior President and Chief Executive Officer, retired and was succeeded by Kimberly K. Ryan, Executive Vice President, who prior to the announcement of the CEO transition plan in June 2021 had been President of the Company’s Coperion business.

2023)
NameCompany ContributionTax
Reimbursements
Additional Personal
Benefits Aggregating
$10,000 Or More
Termination
Payments
401(K)Supp
401(K)
Kimberly K. Ryan$14,867 $119,888 $– *$– $– 
Robert M. VanHimbergen$21,946 $37,892 $– $– $– 
Ulrich Bartel$– $– $– $18,383 **$– 
Nicholas R. Farrell$16,764 $42,091 $– $10,662 ***$– 
J. Michael Whitted$14,500 $37,611 $– $13,623 ****$– 
*Under the Company’s expatriation policies, the Company paid certain of Ms. Ryan’s foreign taxes that related to her work conducted on behalf of the Company while residing in Germany in 2016-2018, and the applicable portions of LTIC awards granted during that time that were exercised. The Company received a refund from the Internal Revenue Service related to those payments and as a result, during fiscal 2023, Ms. Ryan reimbursed the Company $165,491. This payment from Ms. Ryan is not reflected in the Summary Compensation Table.

**    As a non-U.S. employee, Mr. Bartel does not participate in a defined contribution plan. The personal benefits amount reported for Mr. Bartel in the table above reflects vehicle allowances associated with his employment agreement.

***    The personal amount reported for Mr. Farrell in the table above is attributed to payments made by the Company in fiscal 2023 for calendar year 2023 financial planning and tax preparation ($4,900), executive physical ($2,100), and long-term disability insurance premiums ($3,662).

****    The personal amount reported for Mr. Whitted in the table above is attributed to payments made by the Company in fiscal 2023 for calendar year 2023 financial planning and tax preparation ($5,000) and calendar year 2022 financial planning and tax preparation ($2,762), executive physical ($2,200),and long-term disability insurance premiums ($3,661).
80
78


Grants of Plan-Based Awards for Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2021

2023

The following table summarizes the grants of plan-based awards to each of the Named Executive Officers for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2021.

(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) (i) (j) (k) (l)
                         
                         
                  All Other      
                All Other Option     Grant
    Estimated Future Payouts Under Estimated Future Shares Earned Under Stock Awards: Exercise Grant Date Fair
    Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards (1) Equity Incentive Plan Awards (2) Awards: Number Of Or Date Value Of
                Number Securities Base Price Closing Stock And
  Grant Threshold Target Maximum Threshold Target Maximum Of Shares
Or Units
 Underlying
Options
 Of Option
Awards
 Market
Price
 Option
Awards
Name Date $ $ $ # # # # # $/Sh $/Sh $(3)
                                             
Joe A. Raver   $1  $1,038,392  $2,492,141                               
  12/3/2020 (4)              8,691   34,767   60,842                $1,333,314 
  12/3/2020 (5)              8,691   34,767   60,842                $1,333,314 
  12/3/2020 (6)                          34,767            $1,333,314 
                                             
Kristina A. Cerniglia   $1  $421,206  $1,010,895                               
  12/3/2020 (4)              2,281   9,126   15,970                $349,982 
  12/3/2020 (5)              2,281   9,126   15,970                $349,982 
  12/3/2020 (6)                          9,126            $349,982 
  9/17/2021 (7)                          33,775            $1,399,974 
                                             
Kimberly K. Ryan   $1  $458,446  $1,100,270                               
  12/3/2020 (4)              2,064   8,257   14,449                $316,656 
  12/3/2020 (5)              2,064   8,257   14,449                $316,656 
  12/3/2020 (6)                          8,257            $316,656 
                                             
Christopher H. Trainor   $1  $355,777  $853,866                               
  12/3/2020 (4)              1,521   6,084   10,647                $233,321 
  12/3/2020 (5)              1,521   6,084   10,647                $233,321 
  12/3/2020 (6)                          6,084            $233,321 
  7/1/2021 (8)                          60,644            $2,624,976 
                                             
J. Michael Whitted   $1  $326,903  $784,566                               
  12/3/2020 (4)              1,521   6,084   10,647                $233,321 
  12/3/2020 (5)              1,521   6,084   10,647                $233,321 
  12/3/2020 (6)                          6,084            $233,321 
  6/18/2021 (9)                          50,859            $2,099,968 

2023.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)(g)(h)(i)(j)(k)(l)
Estimated Future Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards (1)
Estimated Future Shares Earned Under
Equity Incentive Plan Awards (2)
All Other
Stock
Awards
Number
Of Shares
Or Units
#
All Other
Option
Awards
Number Of
Securities
Underlying
Options
#
Grant
Date Fair
Value Of
Stock And
Option
Awards
$ (3)
Exercise
Or
Base Price
Of Option
Awards
$/Sh
Grant
Date
Closing
Market
Price
$/Sh
Name
Grant
Date
Threshold
$
Target
$
Maximum
$
Threshold
#
Target
#
Maximum
#
Kimberly K. Ryan$1$1,053,798$2,529,115
12/7/2022(4)7,02428,09856,196$1,449,997 
12/7/2022(5)7,02428,09856,196$2,200,073 
12/7/2022(6)28,098$1,449,997 
Robert M. VanHimbergen$1$394,183$946,039
12/7/2022(4)2,0028,00916,018$413,304 
3/14/2022(5)2,0028,00916,018$627,105 
12/7/2022(6)8,009$413,304 
Ulrich Bartel$1$349,099$837,838
12/7/2022(4)1,2915,16710,334$266,643 
12/7/2022(5)1,2915,16710,334$404,576 
12/7/2022(6)5,167$266,643 
Nicholas R. Farrell$1$373,698$896,875
12/7/2022(4)1,0494,1988,396$216,638 
12/7/2022(5)1,0494,1988,396$328,703 
12/7/2022(6)4,198$216,638 
J. Michael Whitted$$354,733 $851,359 
12/7/2022(4)1,2114,8449,688$249,975 
12/7/2022(5)1,2114,8449,688$379,285 
12/7/2022(6)4,844$249,975 
(1)The amounts indicated represent potential cash awards that could have been paid – at the threshold, target (100 percent), and maximum levels – under the STIC Plan. See the “Annual Cash Incentive Awards” section of Part I above for a discussion of this plan. See the Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column of the “Summary Compensation Table” above in this Part III for the actual amounts earned, which were paid in December 2023.
(2)The number of shares indicated represents a grant of performance-based restricted stock units subject to vesting conditions based on the financial performance of the Company during the three-fiscal-year measurement period 2023–2025. During that period, shares represented by the restricted stock units that are issued based on the shareholder value formula (see footnote 4 below) accrue dividend equivalent amounts as dividends are declared on the Company’s common stock. These equivalent amounts are deemed to be reinvested in additional shares of Company common stock and then ultimately paid in the form of additional shares on the distribution date of the underlying award, in proportion to the number of shares that vest and are distributed in accordance with the award formula. Dividends do not accrue during the measurement period with respect to shares represented by the restricted stock units that are
79

(1)The amounts indicated represent potential cash awards that could have been paid – at the threshold, target (100 percent), and maximum levels – under the STIC Plan. See the “Annual Cash Incentive Awards” section of Part I above for a discussion of this plan. See the Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column of the “Summary Compensation Table” above in this Part III for the actual amounts earned, which were paid in December 2021. The amounts in the table represent the annualized levels of the threshold, target, and maximum levels for two six-month measurement periods used during the fiscal year, which were implemented by the Compensation Committee given the uncertainty associated with the COVID-19 pandemic.


(2)The number of shares indicated represents a grant of performance-based restricted stock units subject to vesting conditions based on the financial performance of the Company during the three-fiscal-year measurement period 2021-2023. During that period, shares represented by the restricted stock units that are issued based on the shareholder value formula (see footnote 4 below) accrue dividend equivalent amounts as dividends are declared on the Company’s common stock. These equivalent amounts are deemed to be reinvested in additional shares of Company common stock and then ultimately paid in the form of additional shares on the distribution date of the underlying award, in proportion to the number of shares that vest and are distributed in accordance with the award formula. Dividends do not accrue during the measurement period with respect to shares represented by the restricted stock units that are issued based on the relative TSR formula (see footnote 5 below). The amounts in the table represent the number of shares that could be earned under the awards at the threshold, target (100 percent), and maximum achievement of the applicable performance targets. The vesting schedules for stock awards granted during fiscal 2021 are disclosed by individual Named Executive Officer in the footnotes to the “Outstanding Equity Awards at September 30, 2021” table below.


81

issued based on the relative TSR formula (see footnote 5 below). The amounts in the table represent the number of shares that could be earned under the awards at the threshold, target (100 percent), and maximum achievement of the applicable performance targets. The vesting schedules for stock awards granted during fiscal 2023 are disclosed by individual Named Executive Officer in the footnotes to the “Outstanding Equity Awards at September 30, 2023” table below.
(3)The valuations of performance-based restricted stock units are grant date fair values computed in accordance with stock-based accounting rules (FASB ASC Topic 718) and are based on the methodology set forth in Note 11 to our financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, which was filed with the SEC on November 15, 2023. The amounts used in column (l) for performance-based equity awards are based on an assumed 100 percent achievement of the applicable performance targets.
(4)The number of shares indicated represents a grant of performance-based restricted stock units subject to vesting conditions based on the increase in shareholder value of the Company during the three-fiscal-year measurement period 2023-2025. See the discussion in the “Long-Term Incentive Compensation” section of Part I above under the heading “Shareholder Value RSUs.”
(5)The number of shares indicated represents a grant of performance-based restricted stock units subject to vesting conditions based on the percentile ranking of the Company’s TSR compared to the Index Companies during the three-fiscal-year measurement period 2023-2025. See the discussion in the “Long-Term Incentive Compensation” section of Part I above under the heading “Relative TSR RSUs.”
(6)The number of shares indicated represents a grant of time-based restricted stock units that vest 33-1/3 percent per year over a three-year period.

80


(3)The valuations of performance-based restricted stock units are grant date fair values computed in accordance with stock-based accounting rules (FASB ASC Topic 718) and are based on the methodology set forth in Note 10 to our financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, which was filed with the SEC on November 17, 2021. The amounts used in column (l) for performance-based equity awards are based on an assumed 100 percent achievement of the applicable performance targets.


(4)The number of shares indicated represents a grant of performance-based restricted stock units subject to vesting conditions based on the increase in shareholder value of the Company during the three-fiscal-year measurement period 2021-2023. See the discussion in the “Long-Term Incentive Compensation” section of Part I above under the heading “Shareholder Value RSUs.”


(5)The number of shares indicated represents a grant of performance-based restricted stock units subject to vesting conditions based on the percentile ranking of the Company’s TSR compared to the Index Companies during the three-fiscal-year measurement period 2021-2023. See the discussion in the “Long-Term Incentive Compensation” section of Part I above under the heading “Relative TSR RSUs.”


(6)The number of shares indicated represents a grant of time-based restricted stock units that vest 33-1/3 percent per year over a three-year period.


(7)See footnote 10 to the table below entitled “Outstanding Equity Awards at September 30, 2021.”


(8)See footnote 14 to the table below entitled “Outstanding Equity Awards at September 30, 2021.”


(9)See footnote 16 to the table below entitled “Outstanding Equity Awards at September 30, 2021.”


82

Outstanding Equity Awards at September 30, 2021

2023

The following table summarizes the number and terms of awards of stock options and restricted stock units outstanding for each of the Named Executive Officers as of September 30, 2021.

  Option Awards Stock Awards (1) 
                                 
(a) (b)  (c)  (d)  (e) (f) (g) (h)  (i)  (j) 
                                 
Name 

Number Of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options

#

Exercisable

  

Number Of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options

#

Unexercisable

  

Equity Incentive

Plan Awards: Number Of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options

#

  

Option Exercise Price

$

  

Option

Expiration

Date

 

Number Of Shares Or Units Of Stock That Have Not Vested

#

 

Market Value Of Shares Or Units Of Stock That Have

Not Vested

$ (2)

  

Equity Incentive

Plan Awards: Number Of Unearned Shares, Units Or Other Rights That Have Not Vested

#

  

Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market Or Payout Value Of Unearned Shares, Units Or Other Rights That Have Not Vested

$ (2)

 
                                 
Joe A. Raver  81,154          $31.11  12/2/2025              
   95,556          $36.08  12/7/2026              
   90,090          $45.78  12/7/2027              
   73,293    36,645 (3)      $41.32  12/6/2028         74,798 (5)(7)  $3,190,135 
   60,323    120,645 (4)      $31.94  12/6/2029 35,459 (8) $1,512,326    72,337 (6)(7)  $3,085,173 
                                 
Kristina A. Cerniglia  25,627          $31.11  12/2/2025              
   27,870          $36.08  12/7/2026              
   22,522          $45.78  12/7/2027              
   18,050    9,024 (3)      $41.32  12/6/2028         19,685 (5)(9)  $839,565 
   15,919    31,836 (4)      $31.94  12/6/2029 43,081 (10) $1,837,405    19,040 (6)(9)  $812,056 
                                 
Kimberly K. Ryan  22,202          $28.155  12/3/2023              
   18,428          $32.655  12/3/2024              
   26,396          $31.11  12/2/2025              
   24,605          $36.08  12/7/2026              
   19,519          $45.78  12/7/2027              
   15,315    7,657 (3)      $41.32  12/6/2028         17,705 (5)(11)  $755,118 
   14,243    28,485 (4)      $31.94  12/6/2029 8,420 (12) $359,113    17,127 (6)(11)  $730,467 
                                 
Christopher H. Trainor  7,454          $32.655  12/3/2024              
   12,813          $31.11  12/2/2025              
   20,903          $36.08  12/7/2026              
   18,018          $45.78  12/7/2027              
   13,127    6,563 (3)      $41.32  12/6/2028         12,755 (5)(13)  $544,001 
   10,054    20,107 (4)      $31.94  12/6/2029 67,152 (14) $2,864,033    12,345 (6)(13)  $526,514 
                                 
J. Michael Whitted  127,239          $46.38  6/18/2028              
   15,315    7,657 (3)      $41.32  12/6/2028         13,848 (5)(15)  $590,617 
   11,730    23,458 (4)      $31.94  12/6/2029 57,318 (16) $2,444,613    13,389 (6)(15)  $571,041 

2023.
Option AwardsStock Awards (1)
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)(g)(h)(i)(j)
Name
Number Of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
#
Exercisable
Number Of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
#
Unexercisable
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number Of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
#
Option
Exercise
Price
$
Option
Expiration
Date
Number Of
Shares Or
Units Of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
#
Market Value
Of Shares Or
Units Of Stock
That Have
Not Vested
$ (2)
Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number Of
Unearned
Shares, Units Or
Other Rights
That Have Not
Vested
#
Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market Or
Payout Value Of
Unearned Shares,
Units Or Other
Rights That Have
Not Vested
$ (2)
Kimberly K. Ryan26,396$31.1112/2/2025
24,605$36.0812/7/2026
19,519$45.7812/7/2027
22,972$41.3212/6/202851,164(3)(5)$2,164,749
42,728$31.9412/6/202946,578(6)$1,970,71549,752(4)(5)$2,105,007
Robert M. VanHimbergen16,650(3)(7)$704,462
58,002(8)$2,454,06516,205(4)(7)$685,634
Ulrich Bartel5,664$31.11 12/2/2025
5,340$36.08 12/7/2026
4,427$45.78 12/7/20279,390(3)(9)$397,291
4,655$41.32 12/6/20288,946(10)$378,505 9,136(4)(9)$386,544
Nicholas R. Farrell8,542$31.1112/2/2025
9,953$36.0812/7/2026
9,009$45.7812/7/2027
11,486$41.3212/6/20288,780(3)(11)$371,482
22,621$31.9412/6/202939,143(12)$1,656,1408,528(4)(11)$360,820
J. Michael Whitted127,239$46.386/18/2028
22,972$41.3212/6/202810,187(3)(13)$431,012
11,729$31.9412/6/202928,272(14)$1,196,1889,896(4)(13)$418,700
(1)Figures include accrued dividends where applicable.
(2)Value is based on the closing price of Hillenbrand common stock of $42.31 on September 30, 2023, as reported on the New York Stock Exchange.

(1)Figures below include accrued dividends where applicable.


(2)Value is based on the closing price of Hillenbrand common stock of $42.65 on September 30, 2021, as reported on the New York Stock Exchange.


(3)The options were granted on December 6, 2018. The options fully vested on December 6, 2021.


(4)The options were granted on December 5, 2019. One-third of the options vested on each of December 5, 2020 and December 5, 2021. The remaining one-third will vest on December 5, 2022.


(5)
(3)Such performance-based RSU awards are subject to vesting conditions based on the increase in shareholder value of the Company during a three-fiscal-year measurement period. For additional detail regarding these awards, including information regarding how dividends accrue, see the discussion in the “Long-Term Incentive Compensation” section of Part I above under the heading “Shareholder Value RSUs.” The amounts in the table represent the award amounts at 100 percent achievement of the targeted increase in shareholder value associated with the award, plus accrued dividends where applicable. Generally, award vesting is contingent upon continued employment. See the section titled “Employment Agreements and Termination Benefits” in Part I above for additional information regarding vesting.
(4)Such performance-based RSU awards are subject to vesting conditions based on the percentile ranking of the Company’s TSR compared to the Index Companies during a three-fiscal-year
81


measurement period. Whereas dividends accrue during the measurement period with respect to shares underlying RSU awards based on the increase in shareholder value (see above), dividends do not accrue during the measurement period with respect to shares underlying RSU awards based on relative TSR. For additional detail regarding these awards, see the discussion in the “Long-Term Incentive Compensation” section of Part I above under the heading “Relative TSR RSUs.” The amounts in the table represent the award amounts at the targeted percentile ranking of the Company’s relative TSR. Generally, award vesting is contingent upon continued employment. See the section titled “Employment Agreements and Termination Benefits” in Part I above for additional information regarding vesting.
(5)Ms. Ryan was awarded the following performance-based RSUs (excluding accrued dividends):
Award Date
Restricted Stock
Units Awarded
Vesting Schedule
December 2, 202121,654Award will vest on September 30, 2024, assuming 100% achievement of the targeted increase in shareholder value associated with the award, plus accrued dividends where applicable. Generally, award vesting is contingent upon continued employment. See the section titled “Employment Agreements and Termination Benefits” in Part I above for additional information regarding vesting.
83


(6)Such performance-based RSU awards are subject to vesting conditions based on the percentile ranking of the Company’s TSR compared to its peers (either the Company’s compensation peer group or the Index Companies, as applicable) during a three-fiscal-year measurement period. Whereas dividends accrue during the measurement period with respect to shares underlying RSU awards based on the increase in shareholder value (see footnote 5 above), dividends do not accrue during the measurement period with respect to shares underlying RSU awards based on relative TSR. For additional detail regarding these awards, see the discussion in the “Long-Term Incentive Compensation” section of Part I above under the heading “Relative TSR RSUs.” The amounts in the table represent the award amounts at the targeted percentile ranking of the Company’s relative TSR. Generally, award vesting is contingent upon continued employment. See the section titled “Employment Agreements and Termination Benefits” in Part I above for additional information regarding vesting.


(7)Mr. Raver was awarded the following performance-based RSUs (excluding accrued dividends):

Award Date

Restricted Stock

Units Awarded

Vesting Schedulemetric.
December 5, 20192, 202137,57021,654Award scheduled towill vest on September 30, 2022,2024, assuming 100% achievement of the targeted percentile ranking of the Company’sCompany's relative TSR; will be prorated for Mr. Raver’s retirement.TSR.
February 12, 2020December 7, 202237,57028,098Award scheduled towill vest on September 30, 2022,2025, assuming 100% achievement of the targeted shareholder value metric; will be prorated for Mr. Raver’s retirement.metric.
December 3, 20207, 202234,76728,098Award scheduled towill vest on September 30, 2023, assuming 100% achievement of the targeted shareholder value metric; will be prorated for Mr. Raver’s retirement.
December 3, 202034,767Award scheduled to vest on September 30, 2023,2025, assuming 100% achievement of the targeted percentile ranking of the Company’sCompany's relative TSR; will be prorated for Mr. Raver’s retirement.TSR.

(6)Ms. Ryan was awarded the following time-based RSUs (excluding accrued dividends):

(8)Mr. Raver was awarded the following time-based RSUs (excluding accrued dividends):

Award Date

Restricted Stock

Units Awarded

Vesting Schedule
December 3, 202034,7678,257Award vested one-third on December 2, 2021.  The remaining units are scheduled to vest3, 2021, one-third on December 3, 2022, and one-third on December 3, 2023, but will be prorated for Mr. Raver’s retirement.
84


(9)Ms. Cerniglia was awarded the following performance-based RSUs (excluding accrued dividends):

Award Date

Restricted Stock

Units Awarded

Vesting Schedule2023.
December 5, 20192, 20219,91421,654Award vested one-third on December 2, 2022 and one-third on December 2, 2023. The remaining units will vest on December 2, 2024.
December 7, 202228,098Award vested one-third on December 7, 2023. The remaining units will vest one-third on December 7, 2024 and one-third on December 7, 2025.
82


(7)Mr. VanHimbergen was awarded the following performance-based RSUs (excluding accrued dividends):
Award Date
Restricted Stock
Units Awarded
Vesting Schedule
March 14, 20228,196Award will vest on September 30, 2024, assuming 100% achievement of the targeted shareholder value metric.
March 14, 20228,196Award will vest on September 30, 2024, assuming 100% achievement of the targeted percentile ranking of the Company’sCompany's relative TSR.
February 12, 2020December 7, 20229,9148,009Award will vest on September 30, 2022,2025, assuming 100% achievement of the targeted shareholder value metric.
December 3, 20207, 20229,1268,009Award will vest on September 30, 2023, assuming 100% achievement of the targeted shareholder value metric.
December 3, 20209,126Award will vest on September 30, 2023,2025, assuming 100% achievement of the targeted percentile ranking of the Company’sCompany's relative TSR.

(8)Mr. VanHimbergen was awarded the following time-based RSUs (excluding accrued dividends):

(10)Ms. Cerniglia was awarded the following time-based RSUs (excluding accrued dividends):
Award Date
Restricted Stock
Units Awarded
Vesting Schedule
March 14, 202263,971Award vested one-third on March 14, 2023. The remaining units will vest one-third on March 14, 2024, and one-third on March 14, 2025.
March 14, 20228,196Award vested one-third on December 2, 2022 and one-third on December 2, 2023. The remaining units will vest on December 2, 2024.
December 7, 20228,009Award vested one-third on December 7, 2023. The remaining units will vest one-third on December 7, 2024 and one-third on December 7, 2025.

83


(9)Mr. Bartel was awarded the following performance-based RSUs (excluding accrued dividends):
Award Date

Restricted Stock

Units Awarded

Vesting Schedule
December 2, 20213,969Award will vest on September 30, 2024, assuming 100% achievement of the targeted shareholder value metric.
December 2, 20213,969Award will vest on September 30, 2024, assuming 100% achievement of the targeted percentile ranking of the Company's relative TSR.
December 7, 20225,167Award will vest on September 30, 2025, assuming 100% achievement of the targeted shareholder value metric.
December 7, 20225,167Award will vest on September 30, 2025, assuming 100% achievement of the targeted percentile ranking of the Company's relative TSR.
(10)Mr. Bartel was awarded the following time-based RSUs (excluding accrued dividends):
Award Date
Restricted Stock
Units Awarded
Vesting Schedule
December 3, 20209,1262,639Award vested one-third on December 3, 2021.  The remaining units will vest2021, one-third on December 3, 2022, and one-third on December 3, 2023.
September 17, 202133,775Award will vest 50% on July 1, 2023, and 50% on July 1, 2024.


(11)Ms. Ryan was awarded the following performance-based RSUs (excluding accrued dividends):

Award Date

Restricted Stock

Units Awarded

Vesting Schedule
December 5, 20192, 20218,8703,969Award vested one-third on December 2, 2022 and one-third on December 2, 2023. The remaining units will vest on December 2, 2024.
December 7, 20225,167Award vested one-third on December 7, 2023. The remaining units will vest one-third on December 7, 2024 and one-third on December 7, 2025.
84


(11)Mr. Farrell was awarded the following performance-based RSUs (excluding accrued dividends):
Award Date
Restricted Stock
Units Awarded
Vesting Schedule
December 2, 20214,330Award will vest on September 30, 2022,2024, assuming 100% achievement of the targeted shareholder value metric.
December 2, 20214,330Award will vest on September 30, 2024, assuming 100% achievement of the targeted percentile ranking of the Company’sCompany's relative TSR.
February 12, 2020December 7, 20228,8704,198Award will vest on September 30, 2022,2025, assuming 100% achievement of the targeted shareholder value metric.
December 3, 20207, 20228,2574,198Award will vest on September 30, 2023, assuming 100% achievement of the targeted shareholder value metric.
December 3, 20208,257Award will vest on September 30, 2023,2025, assuming 100% achievement of the targeted percentile ranking of the Company’sCompany's relative TSR.
85

(12)Mr. Farrell was awarded the following time-based RSUs (excluding accrued dividends):

(12)Ms. Ryan was awarded the following time-based RSUs (excluding accrued dividends):

Award Date

Restricted Stock

Units Awarded

Vesting Schedule
December 3, 20208,2574,345Award vested one-third on December 3, 2021.  The remaining units will vest2021, one-third on December 3, 2022, and one-third on December 3, 2023.


(13)Mr. Trainor was awarded the following performance-based RSUs (excluding accrued dividends):

Award Date

Restricted Stock

Units Awarded

Vesting Schedule
December 5, 20192, 20216,2614,330Award vested one-third on December 2, 2022 and one-third on December 2, 2023. The remaining units will vest on December 2, 2024.
December 7, 20224,198Award vested one-third on December 7, 2023. The remaining units will vest one-third on December 7, 2024 and one-third on December 7, 2025.
June 29, 202244,362Award vested one-third on June 29, 2023. The remaining units will vest one-third on June 29, 2024 and one-third on June 29, 2025.
85


(13)Mr. Whitted was awarded the following performance-based RSUs (excluding accrued dividends):
Award Date
Restricted Stock
Units Awarded
Vesting Schedule
December 2, 20215,052Award will vest on September 30, 2022,2024, assuming 100% achievement of the targeted shareholder value metric.
December 2, 20215,052Award will vest on September 30, 2024, assuming 100% achievement of the targeted percentile ranking of the Company’sCompany's relative TSR.
February 12, 2020December 7, 20226,2614,844Award will vest on September 30, 2022,2025, assuming 100% achievement of the targeted shareholder value metric.
December 3, 20207, 20226,0844,844Award will vest on September 30, 2023, assuming 100% achievement of the targeted shareholder value metric.
December 3, 20206,084Award will vest on September 30, 2023,2025, assuming 100% achievement of the targeted percentile ranking of the Company’sCompany's relative TSR.

(14)Mr. Whitted was awarded the following time-based RSUs (excluding accrued dividends):

(14)Mr. Trainor was awarded the following time-based RSUs (excluding accrued dividends):

Award Date

Restricted Stock

Units Awarded

Vesting Schedule
December 3, 20206,084Award vested one-third on December 3, 2021.  The remaining units will vest2021, one-third on December 3, 2022, and one-third on December 3, 2023.
July 6,June 18, 202160,64450,859Award will vest 20% on each of July 6, 2023, July 6, 2024, and July 6, 2025.  The remaining 40% will vest on July 6, 2026.
86


(15)Mr. Whitted was awarded the following performance-based RSUs (excluding accrued dividends):

Award Date

Restricted Stock

Units Awarded

Vesting Schedule
December 5, 20197,305Award will vest on September 30, 2022, assuming 100% achievement of the targeted percentile ranking of the Company’s relative TSR.
February 12, 20207,305Award will vest on September 30, 2022, assuming 100% achievement of the targeted shareholder value metric.
December 3, 20206,084Award will vest on September 30, 2023, assuming 100% achievement of the targeted shareholder value metric.
December 3, 20206,084Award will vest on September 30, 2023, assuming 100% achievement of the targeted percentile ranking of the Company’s relative TSR.


(16)Mr. Whitted was awarded the following time-based RSUs (excluding accrued dividends):

Award Date

Restricted Stock

Units Awarded

Vesting Schedule
December 3, 20206,084Award vested one-third on June 18, 2022 and one-third on June 18, 2023. The remaining units will vest one-third on June 18, 2024.
December 3, 2021.2, 20215,052Award vested one-third on December 2, 2022 and one-third on December 2, 2023. The remaining units will vest on December 2, 2024.
December 7, 20224,844Award vested one-third on December 7, 2023. The remaining units will vest one-third on December 3, 2022,7, 2024 and one-third on December 3, 2023.
June 18, 202150,859Award will vest one-third on each of June 18, 2022, 2023, and 2024.7, 2025.
87
86


Option Exercises and Stock Vested for Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2021

2023

The following table summarizes the value realized upon vesting of stock awards (including the dividends accrued thereon) during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2021,2023, for the Named Executive Officers.

  Option Awards  Stock Awards 
Name 

Number Of Shares

Acquired On

Exercise

#

  

Value Realized On

Exercise

$

  

Number Of Shares

Acquired On

Vesting

#

  

Value Realized

On

Vesting

$

 
                 
Joe A. Raver  156,885  $2,229,867   50,446   (3)  $2,308,913   (1) 
                 
Kristina A. Cerniglia  17,891  $241,702   12,411   (3)  $568,051   (1) 
                 
Kimberly K. Ryan    $   10,534   (3)  $482,141   (1) 
                 
Christopher H. Trainor  4,993  $49,256   9,027   (3)  $413,166   (1) 
                 
J. Michael Whitted    $   10,534   (3)  $482,141   (1) 
           3,870   (4)  $159,836   (2) 

Option AwardsStock Awards
Name
Number Of Shares
Acquired On
Exercise
#
Value Realized On
Exercise
$
Number Of Shares
Acquired On
Vesting
#
Value Realized
On
Vesting
$
Kimberly K. Ryan40,630$813,88922,671(3)$907,520(1)
10,225(4)$530,678(2)
Robert M. VanHimbergen$24,555(4)$1,126,138(2)
Ulrich Bartel8,079$144,3651,173(3)$46,955(1)
3,299(4)$170,425(2)
Nicholas R. Farrell$11,924(3)$477,318(1)
18,058(4)$921,884(2)
J. Michael Whitted$16,702(3)$668,572(1)
21,440(4)$1,124,571(2)
(1)Based upon the mean between the high and low sale prices of Hillenbrand common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the date the Board of Directors of the Company approved distribution of the underlying awards.
(2)Based upon the mean between the high and low sale prices of Hillenbrand common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the vesting date.
(3)These amounts are presented on a pre-tax basis (i.e., not accounting for withholding) and include dividends that were accrued during the measurement period and paid out upon vesting in proportion to the number of shares that vested. These amounts reflect the vesting of shareholder value performance-based RSU awards and of the relative TSR performance-based RSU awards granted by the Company under its LTIC program in fiscal 2021, in accordance with the award formula then in effect. Additional details regarding the LTIC awards granted in fiscal 2021 are set forth under the heading “Long-Term Incentive Compensation” in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of our proxy statement for our 2022 Annual Meeting of shareholders, which was filed with the SEC on December 30, 2021. See the discussion in the “Long-Term Incentive Compensation” section of Part I above for additional explanation of the Company’s LTIC program.
(4)These amounts are presented on a pre-tax basis (i.e., not accounting for withholding) and include dividends that were accrued and paid out upon vesting. These amounts reflect the vesting of time-based RSU awards. For additional information regarding these awards, see the footnotes to the table above titled “Outstanding Equity Awards at September 30, 2023.”
87

(1)Based upon the mean between the high and low sale prices of Hillenbrand common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the date the Board of Directors of the Company approved distribution of the underlying awards.


(2)Based upon the mean between the high and low sale prices of Hillenbrand common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the vesting date.


(3)These amounts are presented on a pre-tax basis (i.e., not accounting for withholding) and include dividends that were accrued during the measurement period and paid out upon vesting in proportion to the number of shares that vested. These amounts reflect the vesting of shareholder value performance-based RSU awards and of the relative TSR performance-based RSU awards granted by the Company under its LTIC program in fiscal 2019, in accordance with the award formula then in effect. Additional details regarding the LTIC awards granted in fiscal 2019 are set forth under the heading “Long-Term Incentive Compensation” in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of our proxy statement for our 2020 Annual Meeting of shareholders, which was filed with the SEC on January 2, 2020. See the discussion in the “Long-Term Incentive Compensation” section of Part I above for additional explanation of the Company’s LTIC program.


(4)These amounts are presented on a pre-tax basis (i.e., not accounting for withholding) and include dividends that were accrued and paid out upon vesting. These amounts reflect the vesting of time-based RSU awards. For additional information regarding these awards, see the footnotes to the table above titled “Outstanding Equity Awards at September 30, 2021.”

88

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation for Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2021

2023

The following table quantifies the “defined contribution” benefits expected to be paid from the Supplemental Retirement Plan (the “SRP”).

(a) (b)  (c)  (d)  (e)  (f) 
Name 

Executive

Contributions In

Last Fiscal

Year

$

  

Company

Contributions In

Last Fiscal

Year

$ (1)

  

Aggregate

Earnings In

Last Fiscal

Year

$

  

Aggregate

Withdrawals/

Distributions

$

  

Aggregate

Balance At

Last Fiscal

Year End

$

 
                
Joe A. Raver $  $87,979  $175,307  $  $1,323,445 
Kristina A. Cerniglia $  $42,568  $104,723  $  $510,985 
Kimberly K. Ryan $  $42,794  $90,878  $  $598,750 
Christopher H. Trainor $  $32,615  $61,935  $  $287,592 
J. Michael Whitted $  $29,669  $16,623  $  $109,281 

(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)
Name
Executive
Contributions In
Last Fiscal
Year
$
Company
Contributions In
Last Fiscal
Year
$ (1)
Aggregate
Earnings In
Last Fiscal
Year
$
Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
$
Aggregate
Balance At
Last Fiscal
Year End
$
Kimberly K. Ryan$$119,888$74,304$$742,286
Robert M. VanHimbergen$$37,892$(403)$$37,489
Ulrich Bartel$$$$$
Nicholas R. Farrell$$42,091$20,217$$169,105
J. Michael Whitted$$37,611$17,446$$168,097
(1)The Company maintains the SRP to provide additional retirement benefits to certain employees selected by the Compensation Committee whose benefits under the Company’s Savings Plan are reduced, curtailed, or otherwise limited as a result of certain limitations under the Internal Revenue Code and as a result of historically excluding their annual cash bonuses from the definition of “compensation” under the contribution formula in the Savings Plan. As noted under the heading “Retirement and Savings Plans” in Part I above, beginning in 2021, the contribution formula also took actual cash bonuses into account. The additional benefits provided by the SRP are designed to reflect the amount by which benefits under the Savings Plan are so reduced, curtailed, or limited by reason of the application of such limitations and exclusion.

(1)The Company maintains the SRP to provide additional retirement benefits to certain employees selected by the Compensation Committee whose benefits under the Company’s Savings Plan are reduced, curtailed, or otherwise limited as a result of certain limitations under the Internal Revenue Code and as a result of excluding their annual cash bonuses from the definition of “compensation” under the contribution formula in the Savings Plan. As noted under the heading “Retirement and Savings Plans” in Part I above, beginning in 2021, the contribution formula also took actual cash bonuses into account. The additional benefits provided by the SRP are designed to reflect the amount by which benefits under the Savings Plan are so reduced, curtailed, or limited by reason of the application of such limitations and exclusion.

“Compensation” under the SRP means the corresponding definition of compensation under the Savings Plan (which is generally equivalent to base salary plus the participant’s actual cash bonus as determined under the Company’s Short-Term Incentive Compensation (STIC) Plan). Amounts reported here are also reported as Supplemental 401(k) in the “Summary Compensation Table” above in the column entitled All Other Compensation and are further described in footnote 5 thereto. Generally, a lump sum cash payment is available to the participant within one year of retirement or termination of employment. In the alternative, a participant may defer receipt by electing a stream of equal annual payments for up to 15 years.


See the more detailed description of the SRP under the heading “Retirement and Savings Plans” in Part I above. The Compensation Committee continues to oversee the selection of which executives are permitted to participate in the plan.

89
88



The following amounts represent employer contributions and above-market earnings that have been reported as compensation in the “Summary Compensation Table” in fiscal 20212023 and previous fiscal years:

Name 2021  2020  2019 
          
Joe A. Raver $87,979  $69,466  $130,025 
Kristina A. Cerniglia $42,568  $34,591  $57,315 
Kimberly K. Ryan $42,794  $31,200  $51,717 
Christopher H. Trainor $32,615  $25,762  $39,248 
J. Michael Whitted $29,669  $23,391  $33,331 

Name202320222021
Kimberly K. Ryan$119,888$69,300$42,794
Robert M. VanHimbergen22
$37,892 n/a n/a
Ulrich Bartel23
$$$
Nicholas R. Farrell$42,091$30,870$25,625
J. Michael Whitted$37,611$29,031$29,669
Potential Payments Upon Termination

The following tables present the benefits that would be received by each of the Named Executive Officers in the event of a hypothetical termination as of September 30, 2021.2023. For information regarding definitions of termination events included in the employment agreements with the Named Executive Officers, see “Employment Agreements and Termination Benefits” in Part I above.

Joe A. Raver

Event 

Salary

And Other

Cash Payments

(1)

  

Accelerated

Vesting Of

Stock Awards

(2)

  

Continuance Of

Health And

Welfare

Benefits

  Total 
             
Permanent Disability $3,784,619  $6,704,721  $42,710  $10,532,050 
Death $2,134,429  $6,704,721  $22,378  $8,861,528 
Termination without Cause $3,384,429  $5,363,875  $42,710  $8,791,014 
Resignation with Good Reason $3,384,429  $5,780,734  $42,710  $9,207,873 
Termination for Cause $  $  $  $ 
Resignation without Good Reason $  $  $  $ 
Retirement $1,634,429  $7,121,580  $  $8,756,009 
Change in Control (3)                

Kristina A. Cerniglia

Event 

Salary

And Other

Cash Payments

(1)

  

Accelerated

Vesting Of

Stock Awards

(2)

  

Continuance Of

Health And

Welfare

Benefits

  Total 
             
Permanent Disability $2,735,972  $1,728,029  $22,534  $4,486,535 
Death $1,162,979  $1,728,029  $12,519  $2,903,527 
Termination without Cause $1,233,140  $1,375,064  $22,534  $2,630,738 
Resignation with Good Reason $1,233,140  $1,484,466  $22,534  $2,740,140 
Termination for Cause $  $  $  $ 
Resignation without Good Reason $  $  $  $ 
Retirement $662,979  $1,837,432  $  $2,500,411 
Change in Control (3)                
90

Kimberly K. Ryan

Event
Salary
And Other
Cash Payments
(1)
Accelerated
Vesting Of
Stock Awards
(2)
Continuance Of
Health And
Welfare
Benefits
Total
Permanent Disability$2,237,876 $3,520,444 $43,173 $5,801,493
Death$916,250 $3,520,444 $– $4,436,694
Termination without Cause$2,316,250 $3,725,336 $43,173 $6,084,759
Resignation with Good Reason$2,316,250 $3,842,626 $43,173 $6,202,049
Termination for Cause$– $– $– $
Resignation without Good Reason$– $– $– $
Retirement$2,316,250 $3,850,394 $– $6,166,644
Change in Control (3)








Event 

Salary

And Other

Cash Payments

(1)

  

Accelerated

Vesting Of

Stock Awards

(2)

  

Continuance Of

Health And

Welfare

Benefits

  Total 
             
Permanent Disability $2,797,197  $1,523,464  $22,229  $4,342,890 
Death $1,140,368  $1,523,464  $12,519  $2,676,351 
Termination without Cause $1,310,368  $1,208,206  $22,229  $2,540,803 
Resignation with Good Reason $1,310,368  $1,307,192  $22,229  $2,639,789 
Termination for Cause $  $  $  $ 
Resignation without Good Reason $  $  $  $ 
Retirement $  $  $  $ 
Change in Control (3)                

Christopher H. Trainor

Event 

Salary

And Other

Cash Payments

(1)

  

Accelerated

Vesting Of

Stock Awards

(2)

  

Continuance Of

Health And

Welfare

Benefits

  Total 
             
Permanent Disability $3,099,226  $1,152,927  $21,356  $4,273,509 
Death $1,092,948  $1,152,927  $11,185  $2,257,060 
Termination without Cause $1,092,948  $3,528,327  $21,356  $4,642,631 
Resignation with Good Reason $1,092,948  $1,131,251  $21,356  $2,245,555 
Termination for Cause $  $  $  $ 
Resignation without Good Reason $  $  $  $ 
Retirement $  $  $  $ 
Change in Control (3)                

22 Mr. VanHimbergen became eligible to participate in the SRP after the end of the 2022 fiscal year.
23 Mr. Bartel is domiciled in Germany and, as such, is not eligible to participate in the SRP.
89


Robert M. VanHimbergen
Event
Salary
And Other
Cash Payments
(1)
Accelerated
Vesting Of
Stock Awards
(2)
Continuance Of
Health And
Welfare
Benefits
Total
Permanent Disability$2,527,223$1,793,518$20,483$4,341,224
Death$655,702$1,793,518$$2,449,220
Termination without Cause$690,702$1,872,987$20,483$2,584,172
Resignation with Good Reason$690,702$1,885,093$20,483$2,596,278
Termination for Cause$$$$
Resignation without Good Reason$$$$
Retirement$$$$
Change in Control (3)
Ulrich Bartel
.
Event
Salary
And Other
Cash Payments
(1)
Accelerated
Vesting Of
Stock Awards
(2)
Continuance Of
Health And
Welfare
Benefits
Total
Permanent Disability$859,865$534,335$$1,394,200
Death$650,885$534,335$$1,185,220
Termination without Cause$640,203$556,204$$1,196,407
Resignation with Good Reason$640,203$593,575$$1,233,778
Termination for Cause$$$$
Resignation without Good Reason$$$$
Retirement$640,203$556,204$$1,196,407
Change in Control (3)
Nicholas R. Farrell
Event
Salary
And Other
Cash Payments
(1)
Accelerated
Vesting Of
Stock Awards
(2)
Continuance Of
Health And
Welfare
Benefits
Total
Permanent Disability$2,715,235$1,559,326$20,178$4,294,739
Death$647,611$1,559,326$$2,206,937
Termination without Cause$688,411$1,537,323$20,178$2,245,912
Resignation with Good Reason$688,411$1,599,018$20,178$2,307,607
Termination for Cause$$$$
Resignation without Good Reason$$$$
Retirement$$$$
Change in Control (3)
90


J. Michael Whitted

Event 

Salary

And Other

Cash Payments

(1)

  

Accelerated

Vesting Of

Stock Awards

(2)

  

Continuance Of

Health And

Welfare

Benefits

  Total 
             
Permanent Disability $3,202,492  $1,316,085  $20,579  $4,539,156 
Death $1,014,545  $1,316,085  $11,195  $2,341,825 
Termination without Cause $954,420  $1,054,666  $20,579  $2,029,665 
Resignation with Good Reason $954,420  $1,335,875  $20,579  $2,310,874 
Termination for Cause $  $  $  $ 
Resignation without Good Reason $  $  $  $ 
Retirement $  $  $  $ 
Change in Control (3)                


(1)Includes, as applicable in each scenario, severance compensation, prorated STIC, and insurance proceeds.


(2)The accelerated vesting value of performance-based restricted stock unit awards includes the annual LTIC awards granted in fiscal 2019, which vested on September 30, 2021, and the annual LTIC awards granted in fiscal years 2020 and 2021, which have not vested. The accelerated vesting value of the awards granted in fiscal 2019 in the table is based on (a) the actual level of achievement of the targeted shareholder value increase as described in footnote 2 to the table above titled “Option Exercises and Stock Vested for Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2021,” and (b) the actual level of achievement of the targeted relative TSR as described in footnote 2 to the table above titled “Option Exercises and Stock Vested for Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2021.”  The accelerated vesting values of the annual performance-based LTIC awards granted in fiscal years 2020 and 2021 assume 100 percent achievement of the applicable performance targets and the closing stock price on September 30, 2021.  However, the actual value that would be realized would be based on the actual achievement of such performance targets at the end of the applicable measurement period and the stock price on September 30, 2023, and September 30, 2022, which is unknown at this time.
91

Event
Salary
And Other
Cash Payments
(1)
Accelerated
Vesting Of
Stock Awards
(2)
Continuance Of
Health And
Welfare
Benefits
Total
Permanent Disability$2,196,222$1,893,181$19,915$4,109,318
Death$640,119$1,893,181$$2,533,300
Termination without Cause$620,419$1,286,485$19,915$1,926,819
Resignation with Good Reason$620,419$1,944,781$19,915$2,585,115
Termination for Cause$$$$
Resignation without Good Reason$$$$
Retirement$$$$
Change in Control (3)
(1)Includes, as applicable in each scenario, severance compensation, prorated STIC, and insurance proceeds.

(2)The accelerated vesting value of performance-based restricted stock unit awards includes the annual LTIC awards granted in fiscal 2021, which vested on September 30, 2023, and the annual LTIC awards granted in fiscal years 2022 and 2023, which have not vested. The accelerated vesting value of the awards granted in fiscal 2021 in the table is based on (a) the actual level of achievement of the targeted shareholder value increase as described in footnote 3 to the table above titled “Option Exercises and Stock Vested for Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2023,” and (b) the actual level of achievement of the targeted relative TSR as described in footnote 3 to the table above titled “Option Exercises and Stock Vested for Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2023.”  The accelerated vesting values of the annual performance-based LTIC awards granted in fiscal years 2022 and 2023 assume 100 percent achievement of the applicable performance targets and the closing stock price on September 30, 2023.  However, the actual value that would be realized would be based on the actual achievement of such performance targets at the end of the applicable measurement period and the stock price on September 30, 2024, and September 30, 2025, which is unknown at this time.
The accelerated vesting value of time-based RSUs is based on the vesting terms set forth in the applicable award agreements and assumes the closing stock price on September 30, 2021.2023.  However, the actual value that would be realized would be based on the circumstances of the termination and the stock price on the termination date, which is unknown at this time.

In addition,


Ms. Ryan and Mr. Raver and Ms. Cerniglia qualifyBartel qualified for special accelerated vesting in the retirement context due to their     
ages at September 30, 2021.2023. None of our other Named Executive Officers qualifies for the
same as of such date; however, in the event of a qualifying retirement in the future, these
executives would be entitled to accelerated vesting value.


(3)See table below titled “Change in Control Benefits.”

(3)See table below titled “Change in Control Benefits.”

91


Change in Control Benefits

The change in control agreements we have with Named Executive Officers may provide the estimated benefits set forth in the following table, calculated assuming a hypothetical termination as of September 30, 2021.2023. For more detail regarding the change in control agreements generally, see the discussion under “Employment Agreements and Termination Benefits” in Part I above. Benefits under our change in control agreements are payable only upon a “double-trigger.” Therefore, the amounts shown in the table below assume not only a change in control but also the requisite qualified termination of employment.

Name 

Salary-Based

Compensation

  

Incentive

Compensation

  

Continuance Of

Health And

Welfare

Benefits

  

Pension

Benefits

  

Retirement

Savings Plan

Benefit

  

Accelerated Vesting Of

Stock-Based

Awards

  

Tax

Gross-Up /

Cutback (1)

  Total 
                         
Joe A. Raver $2,625,000  $4,784,429  $73,268  $  $  $11,500,676  $  $18,983,373 
                                 
Kristina A. Cerniglia $1,140,322  $1,518,220  $48,971  $  $  $4,425,887  $(1,242,251) $5,891,149 
                                 
Kimberly K. Ryan $1,340,000  $1,846,368  $48,298  $  $  $2,655,464  $  $5,890,130 
                                 
Christopher H. Trainor $1,000,000  $1,342,948  $46,378  $  $  $4,583,289  $  $6,972,615 
                                 
J. Michael Whitted $879,750  $1,174,357  $44,669  $  $  $4,363,197  $  $6,461,973 

Name
Salary-Based
Compensation
Incentive
Compensation
Continuance Of
Health And
Welfare
Benefits
Pension
Benefits
Retirement
Savings Plan
Benefit
Accelerated Vesting Of
Stock-Based
Awards
Tax
Gross-Up /
Cutback (1)
Total
Kimberly K. Ryan$2,850,000 $3,693,750 $73,394 $– $– $6,743,986 $– $13,361,130 
Robert M. VanHimbergen$1,070,000 $958,202 $44,053 $– $– $3,760,052 $(746,845)$5,085,462 
Ulrich Bartel$978,635 $884,861 $– $– $– $1,177,931 $(60,114)$2,981,313 
Nicholas R. Farrell$1,081,600 $904,731 $43,387 $– $– $2,725,442 $(347,767)$4,407,393 
J. Michael Whitted$960,600 $860,569 $42,814 $– $– $2,528,251 $– $4,392,234 
(1)As discussed in Part I above under the heading “Employment Agreements and Termination Benefits,” our change in control agreements do not provide for any tax gross-up payments relating to the excise tax on excess “parachute payments” imposed by Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code. If an executive is entitled to receive payments upon a change in control that may be subject to the excise tax, he or she will either be paid the full amount (and remain personally liable for the excise tax) or be paid a reduced amount (cutback) that does not give rise to the excise tax, whichever is greater on an after-tax basis.

(1)As discussed in Part I above under the heading “Employment Agreements and Termination Benefits,” our change in control agreements do not provide for any tax gross-up payments relating to the excise tax on excess “parachute payments” imposed by Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code. If an executive is entitled to receive payments upon a change in control that may be subject to the excise tax, he or she will either be paid the full amount (and remain personally liable for the excise tax) or be paid a reduced amount (cutback) that does not give rise to the excise tax, whichever is greater on an after-tax basis.


These calculations do not consider the value of non-compete provisions that executives must adhere to in order to receive certain payments upon a change in control. These provisions are valuable to the Company and are expected to be enforced in the event of an actual transaction.

93
92


PART IV: COMPENSATION CONSULTANT MATTERS

The Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant was regularly invited to attend Committee meetings during fiscal 2021.

Deloitte Consulting

Deloitte Consulting2023.

Pay Governance was engaged as the independent compensation consultant by the Compensation Committee to assist the Committee in determining the form and amount of compensation paid to our Named Executive Officers for fiscal 2021, through and including June 2021.2023.  Among other things, during fiscal 2021 until its engagement ended, Deloitte Consulting provided advice and recommendations regarding the Company’s executive compensation levels, practices, and strategies; advice on the Company’s peer group; evaluation of performance metrics and peer performance; analysis and recommendations regarding the Company’s STIC and LTIC programs; and periodic reports to the Compensation Committee on market and industry compensation trends and regulatory developments. Fees for those services, which were approved by the Compensation Committee, totaled $228,913 during fiscal 2021.  In connection with these services, the Compensation Committee reviewed the independence of Deloitte Consulting in light of applicable SEC rules and NYSE listing standards regarding compensation consultant independence and affirmatively concluded that Deloitte Consulting was independent from the Company and no conflict of interest relating to its engagement by the Compensation Committee for the applicable period of service.

Other Engagements: Deloitte Consulting

The Company also engaged Deloitte Consulting or its affiliates during fiscal 2021 to provide services unrelated to executive compensation. These engagements primarily consisted of (a) support for integration activities in connection with the Milacron acquisition; (b) purchase price accounting and related valuation services in connection with the Milacron acquisition; (c) tax and other mobility advice on expatriate assignments; (d) international business tax consulting for the Company and certain of its subsidiaries; and (e) support on Internal Revenue Code section 280G matters. Fees paid to Deloitte Consulting and its affiliates for these engagements totaled $924,441 during fiscal 2021. Management initiated these engagements – the Board was not asked to approve them. However, the Chairperson of the Compensation Committee was consulted prior to each material engagement of Deloitte Consulting or any of its affiliates for non-executive compensation-related services during Deloitte Consulting’s tenure. Given the nature and scope of these services, the Compensation Committee believes that these services did not raise a conflict of interest and did not impair Deloitte Consulting’s ability to provide independent advice to the Committee concerning executive compensation matters. In making this determination, the Compensation Committee considered, among other things, the following factors:


The types of non-compensation services provided by Deloitte Consulting;


The amounts of fees for such non-compensation services, noting in particular that such fees are negligible when considered in the context of Deloitte Consulting’s and its affiliates’ total revenues for the period;


Deloitte Consulting’s policies and procedures concerning conflicts of interest;
94


Deloitte Consulting representatives who advised the Compensation Committee did not provide any non-compensation-related services to the Company;


There are no other business or personal relationships between management of the Company or members of the Compensation Committee and the Deloitte Consulting representatives who provided compensation services to the Company; and


Neither Deloitte Consulting nor any of the Deloitte Consulting representatives who provided compensation services to the Company owned any common stock or other securities of the Company.

Pay Governance LLC

The Compensation Committee conducted a request for proposal process to engage a new independent compensation consultant in fiscal 2021, after which Pay Governance was engaged by the Committee in such role for a term commencing in July 2021.  Among other things, since its commencement as the independent compensation consultant, Pay Governance provided advice and recommendations regarding the Company’s compensation philosophy and strategies; advice on the Company’s peer group; evaluation of performance metrics and peer performance; analysis and recommendations regarding the Company’s STIC and LTIC programs; advice on the Company’s anticipated CEO pay ratio disclosure; advice on the Company’s revised clawback policy; advice on the Company’s Pay versus Performance disclosure; advice and recommendations relating to the tax treatment of incentive compensation awards; review and recommendations on CEO and other executive officer compensation for fiscal 2022;2023; and periodic reports to the Compensation Committee on market and industry compensation trends and regulatory developments. The Compensation Committee has reviewed the independence of Pay Governance in light of applicable SEC rules and NYSE listing standards regarding compensation consultant independence and has affirmatively concluded that Pay Governance is independent from the Company and has no conflict of interest relating to its engagement by the Compensation Committee.




95
93


PART V: COMPENSATION-RELATED RISK ASSESSMENT

The Compensation Committee analyzes on an annual basis the actual or anticipated effect (including, as appropriate, a deterrent effect) that our compensation policies and practices have had or may have on our employees with respect to creating any excessive and undesirable risk-taking in the performance of their duties for the Company. The Compensation Committee then makes a determination, on an annual basis, as to whether any of our compensation policies and practices creates risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. At its regularly scheduled meeting held on December 1, 2021,6, 2023, the Compensation Committee determined that the Company’s current compensation policies and practices do not create any such risks.

The Compensation Committee’s determination was based on an assessment of the Company’s variable compensation risk that was led by the Company’s internal audit personnel and supported by its Senior Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer and its Total Rewards Director. The Compensation Committee, with its independent compensation consultant, evaluated the results of this assessment and solicited feedback from a number of other sources, including Company management and internal legal, finance, and human resources personnel. The Company’s executive management team discussed its review and analysis of the results of the assessment with the Company’s Audit Committee and the Compensation Committee before the Compensation Committee made its annual determination regarding compensation-related risk.

The Compensation Committee seeks to discourage and deter inappropriate risk-taking through the compensation programs it adopts and implements for our Named Executive Officers and our employees generally. We believe that the compensation-related programs employed by the Company are consistent with those objectives and align our employees’ incentives for risk-taking with the best long-term interests of our shareholders. These programs provide a holistic approach to compensation that provides a mix of fixed and variable compensation, with the variable component impacting both short-term cash compensation and long-term equity compensation. Program features, such as stock ownership guidelines, limits on the payout of variable compensation, and clawback policies, provide additional balance between risk and reward.

96
94


PART VI: CEO PAY RATIO

As required by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and Regulation S-K under the Exchange Act, we are providing information regarding the relationship of annual total compensation of our CEO and our median employee (the CEO“CEO pay ratio)ratio”). Our CEO pay ratio is a reasonable good faith estimate calculated in a manner consistent with Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K. The ratio set forth below may not be comparable to the ratio for other companies due to differences in operations, industry, locations, employee populations, and compensation practices. Additionally, companies may utilize different methodologies, exclusions, estimates, and assumptions in calculating their CEO pay ratio.

Under the

The rules adopted by the SEC require a registrant to identify its median employee only once every three years unless there has been a change to the employee population that the registrant reasonably believes would result in a significant change to its CEO pay ratio disclosure. While our median employee was last identified in 2021, the Company believes the divestiture of our Batesville business segment would have resulted in a change to the Company’s employee population that would significantly change our disclosure. As a result, we have identified a new median employee was required to be selected this year because it has been three years since we last identified our median employee. Our employee population now also includes employees added through the Milacron acquisition, including a greater population in India, China, and other locations outside the U.S., resulting in updates to our calculation of a consistently applied compensation measure and identification of our median employee.

year.


The median employee was identified from our global employee population as of September 30, 2021.2023. As of September 30, 2021,2023, our global employee population for purposes of our CEO pay ratio consisted of 10,7777,823 employees, with 3,765,1,953 or approximately 3525 percent, located in the United States, and 7,012,5,870, or approximately 6575 percent, located outside of the United States. These figures include employees who joined the Company through acquisitions which closed prior to the commencement of fiscal year 2023,24 but exclude any employees who joined the Company as a result of acquisitions that closed during fiscal year 2023,25 as permitted by the instructions to Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K. As indicated, we have also excluded any employees who left the Company as part of the Batesville divestiture.

The de minimis exception of the pay ratio rules also permits exclusion of up to 5 percent of our employees based outside of the U.S. Pursuant to the de minimis exception, we excluded 166333 of our non-U.S. employees (approximately 1.54.3 percent of our total employee population).27

26


To identify the median employee from the resulting employee population of 10,611,7,490, we first identified a middle 20th percentile based on annual base salary and hourly wages plus target bonuses, which represent the principal forms of compensation provided to our employees. Then for this middle 20th percentile population of 2,1231,481 employees, we collected actual total earnings including base pay, base pay equivalents such as vacation pay and holiday pay, overtime, and actual bonuses for the fiscal year and identified the median employee from that population using those figures. We did not perform any full-time equivalency adjustments for part-time or temporary employees or annualize for employees hired throughout the year. Amounts in foreign currency were converted from local currency to U.S. dollars based on exchange rates as of September 30, 2021.2023.

24 This includes employees who joined as part of the acquisitions of Herbold Meckesheim GmbH and Gabler Engineering GmbH acquisitions which closed in fiscal year 2022.
25 This exclusion includes approximately 2,587 employees who joined as part of the acquisitions of LINXIS Group (closed October 6, 2022), Peerless Food Equipment (closed December 1, 2022), and Schenck Process Food and Performance Materials Business (closed September 1, 2023).
26 We excluded all employees from the following jurisdictions (applicable numbers in parentheses): Mexico (75); Singapore (44); Japan (34); Brazil (33); France (27); Saudi Arabia (26); Spain (21); Belgium (19); South Korea (18); Thailand (13); Austria (10); Poland (4); Turkey (3); Netherlands (2); Luxembourg (1).
95



Our median employee is located in the United States. Once the median employee was identified, the employee’s annual total compensation was calculated in accordance with the requirements of Item 402(c)(2)(x) of Regulation S-K.

The annual total compensation for fiscal 2021year 2023 for our CEO as calculated above was $6,697,463$6,568,880 and the median employee (excluding the CEO) was $43,247.$50,282. The resulting CEO pay ratio for the fiscal year is estimated to be 155131 to 1. Due to the variability of the CEO’s performance-based compensation, the CEO pay ratio can differ significantly from year to year.

96

27 We excluded all employees from the following jurisdictions (applicable numbers in parentheses): Brazil (32); France (31); Saudi Arabia (24); Spain (17); Belgium (17); Japan (13); Austria (12); Russia (10); Turkey (3); Poland (3); Netherlands (2); Luxembourg (1); Australia (1).


97

PART VII: ANTI-HEDGING AND ANTI-PLEDGING

Directors, officers, and all other employees of the Company, or any of their designees, are prohibited from purchasing financial instruments or otherwise engaging in transactions that hedge or offset, or are designed to hedge or offset, any decrease in the market value of the Company’s securities either (i) granted to the employee or director by the Company as part of the compensation of the employee or director, or (ii) held (directly or indirectly) by the employee or director.

Our policy also prohibits purchasing financial instruments or engaging in any transactions that suggest speculation in or hedging against the Company’s securities; engaging in “short sales”; and holding Company securities in a margin account or otherwise pledging Company securities as collateral for a loan.

98
97


PART VIII: PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE

As discussed throughout this proxy statement, we believe that Hillenbrand’s executives should be fairly compensated for creating appropriate long-term returns for shareholders, and the central theme of our compensation philosophy is that a significant portion of our executive compensation will be “performance-based.” Our Compensation Committee and the full Board continually seek improvement and alignment with best practices – both in our compensation program itself and in our corporate governance practices that support it – by soliciting feedback from shareholders and consulting the Company’s independent compensation consultant and other advisors.

The following disclosure is required by the SEC’s pay versus performance rules, containing certain information regarding how the compensation actually paid to our Named Executive Officers relates to Company financial performance. This disclosure has been prepared in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K under the 1934 Act and does not necessarily reflect the value actually realized by our Named Executive Officers or how the Compensation Committee evaluates compensation decisions in light of Company or individual performance. For a discussion of how the Compensation Committee seeks to align pay with performance when making compensation decisions, please review the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section above.

This table provides information about the total compensation of our principal executive officers and our other Named Executive Officers as presented in the Summary Compensation Table (“SCT”) above , the Compensation Actually Paid (“CAP”) to our principal executive officers and our other Named Executive Officers, and the relationship of the CAP to Company performance measures and the relationship of our Total Shareholder Return (“TSR”) to that of the S&P 400 Midcap Industrials Index, our “Peer Group”, as further detailed below.

2023 Pay Versus Performance Table
Value of Initial Fixed $100 Investment Based on4:
Year
Summary Compensation Table Total for Joe Raver1, 2
Compensation Actually Paid to Joe Raver1, 3
Summary Compensation Table Total for Kimberly Ryan1, 2
Compensation Actually Paid to Kimberly Ryan1, 3
Average Summary Compensation Table Total for Other Named Executive Officers1, 2
Average Compensation Actually Paid to Other Named Executive Officers1, 3
Total Shareholder Return
Peer Group Total Shareholder Return5
Net Income (in millions)
Adjusted EBITDA6 (in millions)
(a)(b)(c )(d)(e )(f)(g)(h)(i)(j)(k)
2023n/an/a$6,568,880$6,080,094$1,722,055$1,991,291$117.62$113.55$569.70$552.50
2022$837,858
$(3,862,089)$5,221,058$4,489,948$3,534,856$2,688,243$87.9$83.44$208.90$527.40
2021$7,052,435$12,871,772n/an/a$3,724,707$5,030,433$153.42$141.90$249.90$533.90

1.The principal executive officers and other Named Executive Officers for the three applicable fiscal years were as follows:
• Fiscal year 2023: Ms. Ryan served as principal executive officer for the entirety of fiscal year 2023. The Company’s other Named Executive Officers for fiscal year 2023 were: Robert VanHimbergen, Ulrich Bartel, Nicholas Farrell, and J. Michael Whitted.

• Fiscal year 2022: Ms. Ryan was appointed as principal executive officer effective December 30, 2021, and Mr. Raver served as principal executive officer prior to Ms. Ryan’s appointment. The Company’s other Named Executive Officers for fiscal year 2022 were: Robert VanHimbergen, Kristina Cerniglia, Aneesha Arora, Nicholas Farrell, and Chris Trainor.

• Fiscal year 2021: Mr. Raver served as principal executive officer for the entirety of fiscal year 2021. The Company’s other Named Executive Officers for fiscal year 2021 were: Kristina Cerniglia, Kimberly Ryan, Chris Trainor, and J. Michael Whitted.
98



2.Amounts reported in this column represent (i) the total compensation reported in the SCT for the applicable year in which the Named Executive Officer served as principal executive officer in the case of Ms. Ryan and Mr. Raver and (ii) the average of the total compensation reported in the SCT for the Company’s other Named Executive Officers reported for the applicable year.

3.Adjustments were made to the amounts reported in the SCT for the applicable year to calculate the CAP. A reconciliation of the adjustments for the principal executive officers and for the average of the other Named Executive Officers is provided following the footnotes to this table.

4.The comparison assumes $100 was invested at market close on September 30, 2020, and held through the end of each fiscal year. Under the applicable SEC rules, TSR is calculated as the difference between the Company stock price at the end and the beginning of the measurement period, plus dividends (assumed to be reinvested in Company stock), divided by the Company’s stock price at the beginning of the measurement period. Historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance.

5.The Peer Group used for the TSR is the S&P 400 Midcap Industrials Index, which is also used for the Company’s stock performance chart in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2023. This Peer Group is also used for the calculation of TSR for LTIC purposes even though it is calculated differently.

6.The Compensation Committee selected Adjusted EBITDA as the key metric for measuring and rewarding performance for our Named Executive Officers. This measure is used to determine the payout of 50% of the 2023 STIC awards for the Named Executive Officers. Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure and is calculated based on the Company’s adjusted earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization. See Appendix A for applicable definitions.

The following table shows the amounts deducted from and added to the applicable Named Executive Officer’s annual total compensation as set forth in the Summary Compensation Table (for purposes of this Part VIII, “SCT Total”) to arrive at the CAP for each of the applicable years, as shown in columns (c), (e), and (g) in the chart above. The SCT Total and CAP amounts do not necessarily reflect the actual amount of compensation earned by or paid to our executives during the applicable years, but rather are amounts determined in accordance with Item 402(v) disclosure rules. Fair value amounts were computed in a manner consistent with the fair value methodology used to account for share-based payments in our financial statements under GAAP. The fair value amounts were calculated using our stock price on the last day of each fiscal year or the date of vesting, as applicable, and based upon the probable outcome of applicable performance conditions as of the last day of each fiscal year.







99


202120222023
Joe RaverAverage Other Named Executive OfficersJoe RaverKimberly RyanAverage Other Named Executive OfficersKimberly RyanAverage Other Named Executive Officers
SCT Total$7,052,435$3,724,707$837,858$5,221,058$3,534,856$6,568,880$1,722,055
Plus (Less) Grant Date Fair Value of Stock Awards Granted in Fiscal Year$(4,354,914)$(2,456,619)$—$(3,220,166)$(2,130,098)$(5,100,068)$(1,008,197)
Plus (Less) Fair Value at Fiscal Year-End of Outstanding Unvested Stock Awards Granted in Fiscal Year$6,003,634$2,830,529$—$2,793,996$1,615,820$4,383,449$866,384
Plus (Less) Change in Fair Value of Outstanding Unvested Stock Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years$2,531,849$544,076$(2,866,168)$(153,096)$(223,885)$32,560$155,461
Plus (Less) Change in Fair Value at Vesting of Stock Awards Granted in Fiscal Year that Vested During Fiscal Year$—$—$—$—$11,489$—$—
Plus (Less) Change in Fair Value as of Vesting Date of Stock Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Year For Which Applicable Vesting Conditions Were Satisfied During Fiscal Year$1,638,768$387,740$(1,833,779)$(155,844)$(114,418)$195,272$255,587
Plus (Less) Fair Value as of Prior Fiscal Year-End of Stock Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years That Failed to Meet Applicable Vesting Conditions During Fiscal Year$—$—$—$—$(5,521)$—$—
Plus (Less) Dividends Accrued During Fiscal Year$—$—$—$—$—$—$—
Compensation Actually Paid (CAP)$12,871,772$5,030,433$(3,862,089)$4,489,948$2,688,243$6,080,094$1,991,291


Relationship Between Compensation Actually Paid and Performance Measures

We believe the CAP in each of the fiscal years reflects the Compensation Committee’s philosophy on “pay-for-performance” as the CAP fluctuated year-over-year, primarily due to the result of our stock performance and our varying levels of achievement against performance goals under our STIC and LTIC plans.

The following graphs show the relationship between our TSR and our Peer Group TSR, as well as the CAP as calculated for the principal executive officers and other Named Executive Officers and each of the three respective financial metrics of TSR, Net Income and Adjusted EBITDA. The CAP reflects adjustments to the fair value of equity awards during the three fiscal years, which is impacted by the price of our common stock, and the projected and actual achievement against performance goals. For fiscal 2022, only Ms. Ryan’s CAP is shown in the charts below as Mr. Raver’s 2022 CAP was a negative value, ($3,862,089), and does not align with the performance metrics included in the charts below.


Relationship between TSR and Peer Group TSR

image (19).jpg


100


Relationship between CAP and TSR


PEO CAP vs TSR.jpg

Other NEO CAP vs TSR.jpg

Relationship between CAP and Net Income

PEO CAP vs Net Income.jpg

101


Other NEO CAP vs Net Income.jpg



Relationship between CAP and Adjusted EBITDA

PEO CAP vs EBITDA.jpg


Other NEO CAP vs EBITDA.jpg





102


Tabular List of Financial Performance Measures

The following table contains a list of financial performance measures which we believe represent the most important financial performance measures used by the Company to link compensation actually paid to our Named Executive Officers for fiscal year 2023. See the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this proxy statement for a further description of the metrics used in the Company’s executive compensation program, as well as Appendix A for applicable definitions.

Financial Performance Measure
1.Adjusted EBITDA
2.Revenue/Order Intake
3.Cash Conversion Cycle
4.Relative TSR (calculated as a percentile ranking as compared to companies in the S&P Midcap Industrial 400 Index in the applicable award year)
5.Shareholder Value




103


PROPOSAL NO. 2 – NON-BINDING ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE COMPENSATION OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The core of Hillenbrand’s executive compensation policies and practices continues to be to pay for performance. Our executive officers are compensated in a manner consistent with our strategy, competitive practice, sound corporate governance principles, and shareholder interests and concerns. We believe our compensation program is strongly aligned with the long-term interests of our shareholders. We urge you to read the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this proxy statement for additional details on our executive compensation, including our compensation philosophy and objectives and the 20212023 compensation of our Named Executive Officers.

The U.S. Congress has enacted requirements commonly referred to as the “Say on Pay” rules.

Our shareholders have elected, pursuant to an advisory vote at the Annual Meeting of shareholders in 2017,2023, to hold a Say on Pay Vote each year. Accordingly, we are asking you to vote in favor of the adoption of the following resolution:

BE IT RESOLVED by the shareholders of Hillenbrand, Inc., that the shareholders approve the compensation of Hillenbrand’s Named Executive Officers as disclosed in the proxy statement pursuant to the SEC’s compensation disclosure rules.

As an advisory vote, this Proposal is non-binding. Although the vote is non-binding, the Board of Directors and the Compensation Committee value the opinions of our shareholders and will consider the outcome of the vote when making future compensation decisions for our Named Executive Officers.

The Board of Directors recommends that the shareholders vote FOR Proposal No. 2 to approve the adoption of the above resolution.

The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast on this Proposal No. 2 is required for approval of this non-binding Proposal. If you own shares through a bank, broker, or other holder of record, you must instruct your bank, broker, or other holder of record how to vote your shares in order for your vote to be counted on this Proposal. Abstentions and broker non-votes are not counted as votes cast and, therefore, do not affect the outcome of this Proposal.

99
104


COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS

The NCG Committee determines the compensation of the Company’s non-employee directors. The Company’s director compensation program uses a combination of cash and stock-based compensation to attract and retain highly qualified individuals to serve on the Board. In setting director compensation, the NCG Committee considers the significant amount of time that directors expend in fulfilling their duties to the Company, as well as the skill level required for members of the Board.
The NCG Committee assesses the Company’s director compensation package periodically, but no less frequently than once every three years, to ensure that it reflects competitive market conditions and sound corporate governance practices. In addition, the NCG Committee annually considers and approves non-employee director compensation for that fiscal year, and any changes in director compensation must be approved by the Board. The most recent in-depth assessmentNCG Committee last engaged an independent compensation consultant to conduct a director compensation study in 2022, and the outcome of this study was conductedpresented to the Board and resulted in 2019, resulting in a recommended increasechanges in director compensation. But as partcompensation described below.
Types and Amounts of the Company’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Board voluntarily waived its scheduledDirector Compensation. Our non-employee director compensation includes a cash compensation increase until 2021.

Ascomponent (approximately 40 percent) and an equity component (approximately 60 percent). The cash component for fiscal 2023 was paid quarterly, consisting of a result, from January 1, 2017 through the end of 2020, directors received an annual cash retainer of $70,000. Effective January 1, 2021, this annual cash retainer increased to $80,000, in order to align more closely with the market median, as recommended by the latest Board compensation study. In addition,base amount plus additional retainers for our Committee Chairpersons and the Chairperson of the Board previously received an additional annual cash retainer of $30,000, which was increased to $35,000 effective January 1, 2021, as recommended byBoard. On the compensation study, in order to align more closely with the market. Consistent with recent years, in fiscal 2021, Chairpersonsdate of the Audit, Nominating/Corporate Governance, Compensation, and M&A Committees received an additional annual cash retainer of $12,500. Members of certain non-permanent committees may also receive additional retainers as determined by the Board, but no such retainers were paid during fiscal 2021. Directors do not receive additional per-meeting fees for Board or committee meeting attendance.

Our non-employee director compensation also includes an equity component. Following the close of the 20212023 Annual Meeting of the Company’s shareholders, and on the date thereof, each non-employee director was awarded restricted stock units (“RSUs”) based on a value on that date of $125,000, and the Chairperson was awarded additional RSUs based on a value on that date of $85,000.

Directors who retire or join the Board during the year receive a prorated number of RSUs based on the portion of the fiscal year served. The annual award of RSUs to non-employee directors (including the Chairperson) is issued pursuant to the Stock Plan and is valueddetermined using the average of the high and low sale prices of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant.

Members of certain non-permanent committees may also receive additional retainers as determined by the Board, but no such retainers were paid during fiscal 2023. Directors do not receive additional per-meeting fees for Board or committee meeting attendance.
Recent Changes to Director Compensation. In conformance with the outcome of the independent compensation consultant’s director compensation study in 2022, the NCG Committee recommended and the Board approved various changes to the compensation of our independent directors explained in the footnotes below, as well as updating the compensation of the Chairperson of the Board to align more closely with the market median, as follows:
effective January 1, 2023, the annual cash retainer for independent members of our Board of Directors increased from $80,000 to $95,000;

also effective January 1, 2023, Committee Chairperson fees increased to $20,000 for the Audit Committee Chairperson and $15,000 for all other standing committee Chairpersons, from $12,500 each;
effective January 1, 2024, the additional annual cash retainer of the Chairperson of the Board will increase from $35,000 to $40,000;
105


effective October 1, 2023, the annual RSU award levels for directors increased from $125,000 to $140,000; and
effective October 1, 2024, the additional annual RSU award level for the Chairperson of the Board will increase from $85,000 to $90,000.
The change in Chairperson compensation has a later effective date at the recommendation of the former Board Chairperson and Vice Chairperson, in recognition of Ms. Cornell’s recent elevation to the role, consistent with the Company’s general practice with respect to internally promoted executives growing into a new role. In addition, although the Board’s practice generally has been to pay all Committee Chairpersons equally, the Board has determined that the Audit Committee Chairperson should be paid moderately more than other Committee Chairpersons in light of developing market practice in this regard and the outcome of the director compensation study mentioned above, as well as the recognition of the additional responsibilities of an Audit Committee Chairperson.
Characteristics of Director RSUs. For fiscal 2021,2023, RSUs awarded to non-employee directors vest upon the earlier to occur of (1) the first anniversary of the grant date or (2) the time immediately prior to the commencement of the first annual meeting of the Company’s shareholders that occurs after (not including) the grant date. In all cases, the directors are required to hold the shares underlying these grants – and the shares are not delivered – until after the occurrence of one of the following: a change in control of the Company, the director’s death or permanent and total disability, or the date the director ceases to be a director of the Company. (ForFor more information on the grants, please refer to the discussion found under the section, “Security Ownership of Directors and Management” above.) These RSUs carry no voting rights until such time as the underlying shares are delivered. Dividends paid on the Company common stock are accrued with regard to the RSUs awarded, deemed to be reinvested in Company common stock at the market value on the date of such dividend, and paid in additional shares on the distribution date of the underlying award in proportion to the number of shares that are distributed.

100

Deferred Compensation Plan. Non-employee directors may also participate in the Board deferred compensation plan, in which directors may elect to defer receipt of fees earned. Under the Company’s Supplemental Retirement Plan, deferred amounts may be invested in a variety of Fidelity mutual funds and/orand, at previous times, in Company common stock. Various Hillenbrand directors have participated in this program, and Neil S. Novich and Stuart A. Taylor, II, presently own deferred shares of Company common stock acquired through this program. See the “Retirement and Savings Plans” section of Part I of “Executive Compensation” above for more detail regarding the Supplemental Retirement Plan.

Director Compensation Limit. Our shareholders have approved a limit on total annual base compensation for non-employee directors, contained in our Stock Plan, of $600,000. This limit was adopted to bring the Company further into alignment with general market practices and is inclusive of the value of both the annual cash retainer and the grant date fair value of the annual RSU award. The limit excludes amounts payable for service as a Board or Committee Chairperson. In addition, our
Director Stock Ownership Guidelines. Our Corporate Governance Standards set forth stock ownership guidelines that require our non-employee directors to own an amount of our stock (including, for this purpose, time-based RSUs) equal to five times the director’s annual cash compensation. Our new directors have five years to come into compliance with this requirement, and
106


all of our current non-employee directors (other than Ms. Rumsey, who was elected to the Board in August 2020, Mr. Pullin, who was elected to the Board in May 2021, and Ms. Sawhney, who was elected to the Board in June 2021) are currently in compliance. Ms. Rumsey, Mr. Pullin, and Ms. Sawhney are under the five-year compliance deadline.

107


The following table sets forth the compensation paid to our non-employee directors in fiscal 2021.2023. Directors who are also employees of the Company receive no additional remuneration for services as a director. Of the Company’s directors, only Mr. RaverMs. Ryan was a salaried employee of the Company during fiscal 2021.

1012023.

Director Compensation for the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2021

(a) (b)  (c)  (d)  (e)  (f)  (g)  (h) 
                      
Name 

Fees 

Earned 

Or Paid 

In Cash 

$ (1) 

  

Stock 

Awards 

$ (2) 

  

Option 

Awards 

  

Non-Equity 

Incentive Plan 

Compensation 

  

Change In 

Pension Value 

And 

Nonqualified 

Deferred 

Compensation 

Earnings 

  

All Other 

Compensation 

$ (3) 

  Total 
                      
F. Joseph Loughrey – Chairperson $123,750  $209,992  $  $  $  $129  $333,871 
                             
Edward B. Cloues, II (4) $26,833  $45,855  $  $  $  $  $72,688 
                             
Gary L. Collar $77,500  $124,996  $  $  $  $129  $202,625 
                             
Helen W. Cornell $90,000  $124,996  $  $  $  $129  $215,125 
                             
Joy M. Greenway $77,500  $124,996  $  $  $  $129  $202,625 
                             
Daniel C. Hillenbrand $77,500  $124,996  $  $  $  $129  $202,625 
                             
Thomas H. Johnson (4) $44,753  $73,395  $  $  $  $75  $118,223 
                             
Neil S. Novich $90,000  $124,996  $  $  $  $129  $215,125 
                             
Dennis W. Pullin (4) $32,087  $50,314  $  $  $  $34  $82,435 
                             
Jennifer W. Rumsey $77,500  $124,996  $  $  $  $129  $202,625 
                             
Inderpreet Sawhney (4) $21,758  $34,238  $  $  $  $20  $56,016 
                             
Stuart A. Taylor, II $90,000  $124,996  $  $  $  $129  $215,125 

2023
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)(g)(h)
Name
Fees
Earned
Or Paid
In Cash
$ (1)
Stock
Awards
$ (2)
Option
Awards
$
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
$
Change In
Pension Value
And
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
$
All Other
Compensation
$ (3)
Total
F. Joseph Loughrey - Former Chairperson (4)$32,312 $58,685 $– $– $– $28 $91,024 
Helen W. Cornell –
Chairperson (4)
$130,567 $186,215 $– $– $– $129 $316,911 
Gary L. Collar$105,625 $124,988 $– $– $– $129 $230,742 
Joy M. Greenway$91,250 $124,988 $– $– $– $129 $216,367 
Daniel C. Hillenbrand$91,250 $124,988 $– $– $– $129 $216,367 
Neil S. Novich$109,375 $124,988 $– $– $– $129 $234,492 
Dennis W. Pullin$91,250 $124,988 $– $– $– $129 $216,367 
Jennifer W. Rumsey$91,250 $124,988 $– $– $– $129 $216,367 
Inderpreet Sawhney$91,250 $124,988 $– $– $– $129 $216,367 
Stuart A. Taylor, II$105,625 $124,988 $��� $– $– $129 $230,742 
(1)As described above, at the beginning of fiscal 2023, the directors’ annual cash retainer was $80,000 and increased to $95,000 on January 1, 2023 and the Chairperson of the Board’s additional annual cash retainer was $35,000. In fiscal 2023, Chairpersons of the Nominating/Corporate Governance, Compensation, and M&A Committees received an additional annual cash retainer of $12,500 which increased to $15,000 on January 1, 2023 and the Chairperson of the Audit Committee received an additional annual cash retainer of $12,500 which increased to $20,000 on January 1, 2023. The amounts in this column reflect the total cash retainer actually paid to each director.
(2)Following the close of the 2023 Annual Meeting of shareholders on February 24, 2023, 2,713 RSUs with a fair value of approximately $125,000 were granted to each person who was a non-employee director as of that date. The determination of this value is based on the methodology set forth in Note 11 to our audited financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, which was filed with the SEC on November 15, 2023. As of September 30, 2023, the
108

(1)As described above, effective January 1, 2021, the directors’ annual cash retainer increased from $70,000 to $80,000 and the Chairperson of the Board’s additional annual cash retainer increased from $30,000 to $35,000. In fiscal 2021, Chairpersons of the Audit, Nominating/Corporate Governance, Compensation, and M&A Committees received an additional annual cash retainer of $12,500.


(2)Following the close of the 2021 Annual Meeting of shareholders on February 11, 2021, 2,778 RSUs with a fair value of $124,996 were granted to each person who was a non-employee director as of that date, and the Board Chairperson received an additional 1,889 RSUs with a fair value of $84,996 for his service in such capacity. The determination of this value is based on the methodology set forth in Note 10 to our audited financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, which was filed with the SEC on November 17, 2021. In addition, Mr. Cloues and Mr. Johnson had their awards prorated for their service through their retirement dates, and Mr. Pullin and Ms. Sawhney, who joined the Board of Directors after the 2021 Annual Meeting of shareholders, were awarded RSUs at the time of their election prorated for their anticipated service for the balance of the fiscal year. As of September 30, 2021, the aggregate numbers of shares represented by restricted stock unit awards for our directors were as follows:


102

aggregate numbers of shares represented by restricted stock unit awards for our directors were as follows:
Name
Vested
RSU Awards
#
Unvested RSU Awards
#
F. Joseph Loughrey - Former Chairperson00
Gary L. Collar24,4752,750
Helen W. Cornell - Chairperson41,7484,098
Joy M. Greenway33,0962,750
Daniel C. Hillenbrand13,5452,750
Neil S. Novich53,8762,750
Dennis W. Pullin3,8202,750
Jennifer W. Rumsey6,1902,750
Inderpreet Sawhney3,5092,750
Stuart A. Taylor, II72,4032,750
(3)Consists of Company-provided term life insurance, the value of which is net of premiums paid. Participation in the life insurance program is voluntary and may be declined.

(4)As previously disclosed, Mr. Loughrey served as Chairperson of the Board during fiscal 2022 and part of fiscal 2023 until his retirement on January 10, 2023, at which point Ms. Cornell became Chairperson of the Board.



109

Name 

Vested 

RSU Awards 

 

Unvested RSU Awards 

#

     
F. Joseph Loughrey – Chairperson 68,523 4,733
Gary L. Collar 18,256 2,817
Helen W. Cornell 34,966 2,817
Joy M. Greenway 26,601 2,817
Daniel C. Hillenbrand 7,684 2,817
Neil S. Novich 46,723 2,817
Dennis W. Pullin 0 1,096
Jennifer W. Rumsey 572 2,817
Inderpreet Sawhney 0 795
Stuart A. Taylor, II 64,693 2,817


(3)Consists of Company-provided term life insurance, the value of which is net of premiums paid. Participation in the life insurance program is voluntary and may be declined.


(4)Mr. Cloues retired on February 11, 2021, following the close of the 2021 Annual Meeting of shareholders pursuant to the Company’s director retirement policy. Mr. Johnson retired on May 3, 2021, after thirteen years of distinguished service, and his decision to retire stemmed from personal reasons. Mr. Johnson did not express any disagreement with the Company on any matter relating to the Company’s operations, policies, or practices. Mr. Pullin and Ms. Sawhney were elected to the Board on May 7, 2021 and June 23, 2021, respectively.


103

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

The following table sets forth information concerning the Company’s equity compensation plans as of September 30, 2021:

  (a) (b) (c)
Plan Category 

Number Of Securities 

To Be Issued Upon 

Exercise Of Outstanding 

Options, Warrants, And 

Rights 

# (1) 

 

Weighted-Average 

Exercise Price Of 

Outstanding Options, 

Warrants, And Rights 

$ 

 

Number Of Securities 

Remaining Available For 

Issuance Under Equity 

Compensation Plans 

(Excluding Securities 

Reflected In Column (a)) 

# 

       
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders 3,640,286 $ 36.36 4,029,510

2023:
(a)(b)(c)
Plan Category
Number Of Securities
To Be Issued Upon
Exercise Of Outstanding
Options, Warrants, And
Rights
# (1)
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price Of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants, And Rights
$
Number Of Securities
Remaining Available For
Issuance Under Equity
Compensation Plans
(Excluding Securities
Reflected In Column (a))
#
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders1,988,836$46.123,199,541
(1)Shares underlying awards of performance-based restricted stock units are reflected in this column as follows: (i) with respect to awards that vested on September 30, 2023, this column reflects the actual vesting of awards and, therefore, the number of shares actually issued with respect to such awards; and (ii) with respect to awards that are scheduled to vest on September 30, 2024 and September 30, 2025, this column reflects a number of shares that would be issued if the maximum (either 175 or 200 percent based on previously disclosed changes) potential payout were earned. We reserve within our Stock Plan a number of shares sufficient to cover the maximum potential payout of our then-outstanding performance-based equity awards.
110

(1)Shares underlying awards of performance-based restricted stock units are reflected in this column as follows: (i) with respect to awards that vested on September 30, 2021, this column reflects the actual vesting of awards and, therefore, the number of shares actually issued with respect to such awards; and (ii) with respect to awards that are scheduled to vest on September 30, 2022 and September 30, 2023, this column reflects a number of shares that would be issued if the maximum 175 percent potential payout were earned. We reserve within our Stock Plan a number of shares sufficient to cover the maximum 175 percent potential payout of our then-outstanding performance-based equity awards.


104

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Committee”) is composed of four directors, each of whom is independent under SEC Rule 10A-3 and the New York Stock Exchange listing standards. The Committee operates under a written Charter adopted by the Board of Directors, a copy of which can be accessed at https://ir.hillenbrand.com/corporate-governance/governance-documents. The Committee has the authority to conduct or authorize investigations into any matters within the scope of its responsibilities and the authority to retain such outside counsel, experts, and other advisors as it determines appropriate to assist it in the conduct of any such investigation.

Management has the primary responsibility for the Company’s financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for assessing the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. The independent registered public accounting firm of Ernst & Young LLP (“EY”) was responsible in fiscal 20212023 for performing an integrated audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements and its internal control over financial reporting in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) and the issuance of a report thereon. The Audit Committee’s responsibility is to monitor and oversee these processes. In addition, the Committee approves, subject to shareholder ratification, the appointment of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm and pre-approves all audit and non-audit services to be performed by the firm.

The Committee has reviewed and discussed the audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2021,2023, with management and representatives of EY. Management represented to the Committee that the Company’s consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Representatives of EY discussed with the Committee matters required to be discussed by Auditing Standard No. 1301, “Communications with Audit Committees,” as adopted by PCAOB.

EY also provided to the Committee the written disclosures and the letter required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the Audit Committee regarding independence, and the Audit Committee discussed with EY its independence. In addition, the Committee considered whether non-audit consulting services provided by EY impaired its independence and concluded that such services did not impair its independence.

Based upon these procedures and discussions, the Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited consolidated financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2021,2023, for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Submitted by the Audit Committee,
Neil S. Novich (Chairperson)
Joy M. Greenway
Daniel C. Hillenbrand
Inderpreet Sawhney

105
111


PROPOSAL NO. 3 – RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF THE INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


Subject to shareholder ratification, the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company has appointed the firm of EY, certified public accountants, as the independent registered public accounting firm to make an examination of the consolidated financial statements of the Company for its fiscal year ending September 30, 2022.2024. EY served as the independent registered public accounting firm of the Company for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2021.2023. As we intend to hold our Annual Meeting in person, we expect that a representative of EY will be available at the Annual Meeting with an opportunity to make a statement if he or she desires to do so and will also be available to respond to appropriate questions. If we determine that alternative arrangements are needed for the Annual Meeting, we will endeavor to have a representative of EY similarly available.

The Board of Directors, at the request of the Audit Committee, recommends that the shareholders vote FOR Proposal No. 3 to ratify the appointment of EY as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2022.

2024.

The affirmative vote of a majority in voting power of the votes cast on this Proposal No. 3 is required for approval of this Proposal. Abstentions and broker non-votes are not counted as votes cast and, therefore, do not affect the outcome of the Proposal.

If the appointment is not ratified by a majority of the votes cast, the adverse vote will be considered as an indication to the Audit Committee that it should consider selecting another independent registered public accounting firm for the following fiscal year.

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

The Audit Committee has adopted a policy requiring that all services to be performed by the independent registered public accounting firm be pre-approved by the Audit Committee or its delegate (Chairperson) and has adopted guidelines that fees for non-audit related services, including tax consulting, tax compliance, and tax preparation fees, should not exceed the total of audit and audit-related fees. During each of the fiscal years ended September 30, 2020,2022, and 2021,2023, EY’s fees, all of which were approved by the Audit Committee, fell within these guidelines.

The table below sets forth the aggregate amount of fees billed for professional services rendered by EY to the Company and its subsidiaries for this period.

  2021 2020
     
Audit Fees (1) $4,000,000 $3,663,000
Audit-Related Fees (2) $55,000 $78,000
Tax Fees (3) $314,000 $345,000
All Other Fees (4) $4,000 $3,000
Total $4,373,000 $4,089,000

20232022
Audit Fees (1)$4,658,000 $4,027,000 
Audit-Related Fees (2)$90,000 $92,000 
Tax Fees (3)$549,000 $839,000 
All Other Fees (4)$4,000 $354,000 
Total$5,301,000 $5,312,000 
(1)Audit Fees services include: (i) the audit by EY of the financial statements included in our annual reports on Form 10-K; (ii) reviews by EY of the interim financial statements included in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q; and (iii) statutory audits by EY of certain subsidiaries.
112

(1)Audit Fees services include: (i) the audit by EY of the financial statements included in our annual reports on Form 10-K; (ii) reviews by EY of the interim financial statements included in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q; and (iii) statutory audits by EY of certain subsidiaries.


106

(2)Audit-Related Fees services include out of pocket expenses for EY.
(3)Tax Fees services include general tax consulting services from EY.
(4)All Other Fees primarily include fees related to preparing a standalone financial statement of the Batesville business in 2022 in connection with the divestiture, as well as a subscription to EY Atlas, a cloud-based platform and research tool.
113


(2)Audit-Related Fees services include out of pocket expenses for EY.


(3)Tax Fees services include general tax consulting services from EY.


(4)All Other Fees services include a subscription to EY Atlas, a cloud-based platform and research tool.


107

OTHER MATTERS

The Board of Directors does not know of any matters that will be brought before the 20222024 Annual Meeting other than those listed in the notice of meeting. If any other matters are properly introduced at the meeting for consideration, the individuals named on the proxy card will have authority to vote on such matters in their discretion.

December 30, 2021

January 9, 2024
108
114


APPENDIX A

INCENTIVE PLAN DEFINITIONS

This Appendix A outlines the definitions of terms used in the proxy statement, primarily in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis.

STIC Plan Definitions

Performance Metric
Performance
Metric
Definition
Adjusted EBITDAMeans adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization, an externally reported financial metric and non-GAAP operating performance measure.
Adjusted IBTMeans income before taxes, using adjusted net income attributable to Hillenbrand, an externally reported financial metric and non-GAAP operating performance measure, as the starting point for the calculation and adding back adjusted income taxes and noncontrolling interest.
Net Revenue

Means GAAP net revenue.

Cash Conversion Cycle or CCCMeans the time (in days) required to generate cash flows from the production and sales process. The CCC calculation is based on a 12-month average.
Order Intake

Means the value of firm orders received from customers (net of all cancellations) during, adjusted to eliminate the fiscal year.

effects of certain extraordinary and non-recurring items.

A-1



Shareholder Value RSU Definitions

Element of
Formula
Definition
Shareholder Value Expected
Means (a) prior year Adjusted NOPAT for the Company’s Batesville business, multiplied by the cube of 98 percent, divided by the Hurdle Rate, plus (b) if applicable, Adjusted NOPAT for certain
recently acquired businesses, as determined by the Compensation
Committee, in each case divided by the Hurdle Rate, plus (c)(b) prior year
Adjusted NOPAT for all of the Company’s other business units, divided
by the Hurdle Rate, times the cube of one plus the Hurdle Rate, plus (d) (c)
the Expected Cash Flow Component for (i) Batesville and (ii) such recently acquired businesses.28Component.
Expected Cash Flow Component (only for certain recently acquired businesses, as determined by the Compensation Committee,29 and for Batesville)Committee) 27

Means the sum of the following:

●    

Adjusted Cash Flows for the prior fiscal year for the applicable business unit multiplied by the square of (1 + Hurdle Rate) (and multiplied, only in the case of Batesville, by 98 percent);30

●    

Adjusted Cash Flows for the prior fiscal year for the applicable business unit multiplied by (1 + Hurdle Rate) (and multiplied, only in the case of Batesville, by the square of 98 percent); and

●    

Adjusted Cash Flows for the prior fiscal year for the applicable business unit (multiplied, only in the case of Batesville, by the cube of 98 percent).

unit.

Ending NOPAT Component of Shareholder Value Delivered

Means the Company’s Adjusted NOPAT for the last fiscal year of the measurement period, divided by the Hurdle Rate. For divested businesses, the calculation uses tax-effected sale proceeds of, and free cash flow generated prior to, divestiture.

28 In establishing the Shareholder Value Expected with respect to Batesville, the Adjusted NOPAT is adjusted to reflect a two percent decrease in Batesville’s NOPAT annually over the performance period, in order to align Batesville more closely with the declining market trends in the industry in which it competes. For awards granted in fiscal 2020, Adjusted NOPAT of the Company’s Molding Technologies Solutions operating segment that was acquired during the performance period and included in this formula was based on management’s business plan for the final year of the measurement period at the time the Board approved the acquisition, which was designed to improve on prior performance. 

29 For awards granted in fiscal 2020, the Expected Cash Flow Component of the Company’s Molding Technologies Solutions operating segment that was included in this formula was, instead of being based on prior year performance, based on management’s business plan for each year remaining in the measurement period at the time that the Board approved the acquisition, which was designed to improve on prior performance. 

30 The Company uses this two percent adjustment for Batesville for the reasons set forth above in footnote 28.

A-2

Element of FormulaDefinition
Ending Cash Flow Component of Shareholder Value Delivered

Means the sum of the following:

●    

Adjusted Cash Flows for the first fiscal year in the measurement period, multiplied by the square of (1 + Hurdle Rate);

●    

Adjusted Cash Flows for the second fiscal year in the measurement period, multiplied by (1 + Hurdle Rate); and

●    

Adjusted Cash Flows (as defined below) for the third fiscal year in the measurement period.

27 For awards granted in fiscal 2023, the Expected Cash Flow Component reflected the Company’s Herbold Meckesheim GmbH and Gabler Engineering GmbH acquisitions. .
A-2


Element of
Formula
Definition
Adjusted NOPAT (beginning fiscal 2021)

Means the Company’s externally reported “adjusted net income attributable to Hillenbrand” measure adjusted for certain items, including the following (net of tax where applicable):31

●    

Income attributable to non-controlling interests (included);

●    

Interest income, losses, or impairments on corporate investments and interest expense on corporate debt (excluded);

●    

Changes in tax law or regulation or accounting pronouncements in United States GAAP or applicable international standards that cause an inconsistency in computation as originally designed (excluded); and

●    

The effect of acquisitions during the measurement period (excluded for the duration of the measurement period).

31 This new approach simplifies the NOPAT calculation by using an existing externally reported metric as a starting point, and then making fewer adjustments to it. The Compensation Committee expects the new approach to yield substantially similar results to Adjusted NOPAT as calculated for prior awards. Given the new externally reported starting point for the calculation, there is no need to adjust for amortization, non-recurring and material legal costs, and the like, as these adjustments are already considered in the starting point.

A-3

Element of FormulaDefinition
Adjusted NOPAT (prior to fiscal 2021)

Means NOPAT as adjusted (net of tax where applicable) to exclude certain items, including the following:

●     income, losses, or impairments from specific financial instruments transferred to the Company as part of our spin-off in 2008;

●     interest income on corporate investments and interest expense on corporate debt;

●     all professional fees, due diligence fees, expenses, and integration costs related to a specific acquisition or disposition;

●     amortization expense of intangible long-lived assets where internally generated costs are not customarily capitalized in the normal course of the business (e.g., customer lists, patents, etc.);

●     all adjustments made to net income related to changes in the fair value of contingent earn-out awards;

●     extraordinary external, non-recurring, and material legal costs;

●     restructuring charges and other items related to a restructuring plan approved by the Company’s CEO; and

●     changes in accounting pronouncements in United States GAAP or applicable international standards that cause an inconsistency in computation as originally designed.

A-4

Element of FormulaDefinition
Adjusted Cash Flows (beginning fiscal 2021)

Means net cash provided by operating activities (whether positive or negative) during a fiscal year, less capital expenditures net of proceeds on the disposal of property, all as shown on audited financial statements for that fiscal year, as adjusted (net of tax where applicable) to exclude the effects of certain items, including the following:32

●    

cash receipts or disbursements from investments;

●    

interest income on corporate investments and interest expense on corporate debt;

●    

the difference between the cash pension payment for an active defined benefit plan actually made and the pension expense recorded;

●    

changes in tax law or regulation or accounting pronouncements in United States GAAP or applicable international standards that cause an inconsistency in computation as originally designed;

●    

the effect of acquisitions during the measurement period, which shall be excluded for the duration of such period; and

●    

all other externally reported adjustments to GAAP net income that, consistent with “adjusted net income attributable to Hillenbrand” as externally reported by the Company, result in cash inflow or outflow, to be included or excluded as applicable.

28

32 28This new approach more closely aligns the cash flows calculation with certain other externally reported adjustments.

A-5
A-3



Element of FormulaDefinition
Adjusted Cash Flows (prior to fiscal 2021)

Means net cash provided by operating activities (whether positive or negative) during a fiscal year, less capital expenditures net of proceeds on the disposal of property, all as shown on audited financial statements for that fiscal year, as adjusted (net of tax where applicable) to exclude the effects of certain items, including the following:

●     cash receipts or disbursements from financial instruments transferred to the Company as part of our spin-off in 2008;

●     interest income on corporate investments and interest expense on corporate debt;

●     the difference between the cash pension payment for an active defined benefit plan actually made and the pension expense recorded;

●     extraordinary external, non-recurring, and material legal disbursements;

●     changes in accounting pronouncements in United States GAAP or applicable international standards that cause an inconsistency in computation as originally designed; and

●     the cost of consummated acquisitions or dispositions, including the purchase price, all professional fees, due diligence fees, expenses, and integration costs.

A-6

Relative TSR RSU Definitions

Element of FormulaDefinition
Beginning Average price (of stock) (for fiscal 2019)Means, with respect to the Company and each
Element of its compensation peer group companies, the average closing price of that company’s stock over the 20 trading days immediately preceding (but not including) the first day of the measurement period, adjusted for dividends by applying that company’s Dividend Reinvestment Multiplier.
Formula
Definition
Beginning Average Price (of stock) (for fiscal 2020 and fiscal 2021)Means with respect to the Company and each of the Index Companies, the average closing price of that company’s stock on the trading day immediately preceding the first day of the measurement period33 using the same Dividend Reinvestment Multiplier.
Ending Average Price (of stock) (for fiscal 2019)Means, with respect to the Company and each of its compensation peer group companies, the average closing price of that company’s stock over the 20 trading days immediately preceding (and including) the last day of the measurement period, adjusted for dividends by applying that company’s Dividend Reinvestment Multiplier.
Ending Average Price (of stock) (for fiscal 2020 and fiscal 2021)Means, with respect to the Company and each of the Index Companies, the average closing price of that company’s stock on the last trading day of the measurement period, using the same Dividend Reinvestment Multiplier.
Dividend Reinvestment MultiplierMeans, for the Company and each of its compensation peer group companies or the Index Companies, as applicable, a calculation of the value of dividends paid out by that company, assuming reinvestment of those dividends in that company’s stock, calculated by dividing each dividend paid out by that company over the applicable period by its closing share price on the ex-dividend date.

*    *    *

A-4

33 This change was made to more closely align with prevailing market practice.  

A-7

[This page intentionally left blank.]






hillenbrandinc_prxycardx001.jpg



hillenbrandinc_prxycardx002.jpg